Re: [Evolution] Compiling Evo

2005-11-16 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 00:37 +0100, guenther wrote: Evo does not depend on gal since 2.4. From the README of evo 2.4.1: * gal 2.4.0 or later ftp://ftp.gnome.org/pub/gnome/sources/gal If this is wrong, maybe someone should update the README. Note that the README for 2.5.1

[Evolution] Remove from server after X days ?

2005-11-16 Thread trebor iksrazal
Hi all, Windows outlook and Thunderbird apparently have a feature, with pop3, to leave e-mail on the server after several days and then remove. I can't find this feature in evolution, does it have it? iksrazal None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free. --

Re: [Evolution] Re: Problems with cyrillic

2005-11-16 Thread Nicolas Chevreux
Hello, Арангел Ангов wrote in an email dated 15-Nov-05 20:36: Mozilla Thunderbird supports UTF-8 that's for sure. I got complains from two recipients using Thunderbird and since I've been using Thunderbird for a long time before switching to Evo I thought that smth was wrong with Evolution.

[Evolution] publish free/busy data to a .mac account

2005-11-16 Thread Mike Linksvayer
Hi. I'm using Evolution 2.4.1, specifically 2.4.1-0ubuntu7 I'd like to publish free/busy data to a .mac account, but I can't seem to figure out the proper publishing location to give to Evolution (calendar) via Edit|Preferences|Free/Busy. When viewing others calendars I use

Re: [Evolution] smtp server config

2005-11-16 Thread Ron Johnson
On Mon, 2005-11-14 at 20:41 +0800, Lynda Metref wrote: Which version of Evolution is that? 2.4.1 This is the key. The pick one means that in your Compose window, the From line is actually a drop-down list, if you have multiple mail accounts defined. So I need to have a huge number

Re: [Evolution] Forwarding mail with embedded images

2005-11-16 Thread guenther
Dear Guenther and list, The problem with forwarding mail as an attachment is that you don't get to edit it. This is unacceptable when dealing with personal matters and so I do not want it to be my default. This may be a feature that is needed in a business environment, but not for

Re: [Evolution] Compiling Evo

2005-11-16 Thread guenther
On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 07:49 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 00:37 +0100, guenther wrote: Evo does not depend on gal since 2.4. From the README of evo 2.4.1: * gal 2.4.0 or later ftp://ftp.gnome.org/pub/gnome/sources/gal If this is wrong,

Re: [Evolution] Remove from server after X days ?

2005-11-16 Thread Andre Klapper
hi trebor, Am Montag, den 14.11.2005, 09:08 -0800 schrieb trebor iksrazal: Windows outlook and Thunderbird apparently have a feature, with pop3, to leave e-mail on the server after several days and then remove. I can't find this feature in evolution, does it have it? no, unfortunately not.

Re: [Evolution] Forwarding mail with embedded images

2005-11-16 Thread Pete Biggs
Regarding forwarding: I do use forward attached exclusively, and I believe this is the way to go. Nonetheless I think at least having the options around as in 2.2 and previous versions is just fine, and they should not be removed. Unfortunately I don't recall if this actually vanished from

Re: [Evolution] smtp server config

2005-11-16 Thread guenther
This is the key. The pick one means that in your Compose window, the From line is actually a drop-down list, if you have multiple mail accounts defined. So I need to have a huge number of ID... my number of e-mail address multiplied by my number of smtp server... At present time

Re: [Evolution] Compiling Evo

2005-11-16 Thread guenther
On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 13:41 +0100, guenther wrote: On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 07:49 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 00:37 +0100, guenther wrote: Evo does not depend on gal since 2.4. From the README of evo 2.4.1: * gal 2.4.0 or later

Re: [Evolution] Compiling Evo

2005-11-16 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 13:41 +0100, guenther wrote: Note that the README for 2.5.1 is identical to that for 2.4.1. In fact I've been unable to compile 2.5.1 because of config errors. I'm using the exact same config options as for 2.4.1. An update to the README would appear to be

Re: [Evolution] Compiling Evo

2005-11-16 Thread Andre Klapper
Am Mittwoch, den 16.11.2005, 12:51 -0400 schrieb Patrick O'Callaghan: BTW I don't use the CVS versions. I did try a year or so ago but it was just too much pain; 36 modules to compile 51 modules nowadays. :-) andre -- mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | failed! http://www.iomc.de signature.asc

Re: [Evolution] Forwarding mail with embedded images

2005-11-16 Thread guenther
Regarding forwarding: I do use forward attached exclusively, and I believe this is the way to go. Nonetheless I think at least having the options around as in 2.2 and previous versions is just fine, and they should not be removed. Unfortunately I don't recall if this actually vanished

Re: [Evolution] Compiling Evo

2005-11-16 Thread guenther
BTW I don't use the CVS versions. I did try a year or so ago but it was just too much pain; 36 modules to compile 51 modules nowadays. :-) This is progress? :-( Probably yes. The entire Desktop is more integrated, rather than having a bunch of totally independent apps that don't

Re: [Evolution] Arrow keys vs mouse navigation

2005-11-16 Thread Lee Revell
On Mon, 2005-11-14 at 06:09 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 14:51 -0500, Lee Revell wrote: Why is navigating the message list with the arrow keys so much slower than using the mouse? When I push the down arrow to go to the mext message it seems like there is a delay of

Re: [Evolution] Collapsing Threads in View messages by Thread

2005-11-16 Thread guenther
Is there a way of collapsing the threads in the View messages by Thread in a folder? Sure, click the small triangle at the left, next to the Subject in the mail list... ;-) Seriously, there is no way to collapse all threads in one fell swoop, unfortunately. I believe this already is filed in

Re: [Evolution] Forwarding mail with embedded images

2005-11-16 Thread guenther
It does seem to be a retrograde step that you can't over-ride the forwarding style at the time you do the forwarding - anyone any idea why it was changed? This very likely was removed during the massive menu structure changes. *sigh* I do hope, this is just an oversight, though.

[Evolution] Palm fails to sync Evolution calendar

2005-11-16 Thread supergerg
I'm running Evolution-2.4.1 and gnome-pilot-2.0.13, and I setup the Pilot settings to only sync with ECalendar from Evolution. All the other condiuts are disabled. When I push the HotSync button on my Palm Pilot Tungsten E, I get this message from /usr/libexec/gpilotd: gpilotd-Message:

Re: [Evolution] Forwarding mail with embedded images

2005-11-16 Thread George Reeke
Dear Guenther and list (my original mail and your reply edited for length) On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 13:06 +0100, guenther wrote: [The part with two is from my original posting, GNR] Dear Guenther and list, The problem with forwarding mail as an attachment is that you don't get to edit

Re: mailto: with Body part broken (was: Re: [Evolution] Three small questions about Evolution)

2005-11-16 Thread guenther
I can't say that Evo's behaviour is strictly wrong, since all it's doing is what Firefox is telling it, i.e. create a message with a given Body. The Evo developers could argue that adding an extra line in Normal format is exceeding the spec. It would be nothing more than adding a

Re: [Evolution] Forwarding mail with embedded images

2005-11-16 Thread Andre Klapper
good evening ladies and gentlemen, Am Mittwoch, den 16.11.2005, 21:22 +0100 schrieb guenther: take a look at http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=262601#c6 for the reasons. Different bug. Especially comment #6 just explains, why forwarding quoted or inline does not include the

Re: [Evolution] Forwarding mail with embedded images

2005-11-16 Thread guenther
take a look at http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=262601#c6 for the reasons. Different bug. Especially comment #6 just explains, why forwarding quoted or inline does not include the attachments. hmm. after reading it again i have to say: yes, one can also read this

Re: mailto: with Body part broken (was: Re: [Evolution] Three small questions about Evolution)

2005-11-16 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 23:41 +0100, guenther wrote: I can't say that Evo's behaviour is strictly wrong, since all it's doing is what Firefox is telling it, i.e. create a message with a given Body. The Evo developers could argue that adding an extra line in Normal format is exceeding

Re: [Evolution] Collapsing Threads in View messages by Thread

2005-11-16 Thread Parthasarathi Susarla
On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 20:38 +0100, guenther wrote: Is there a way of collapsing the threads in the View messages by Thread in a folder? Sure, click the small triangle at the left, next to the Subject in the mail list... ;-) Seriously, there is no way to collapse all threads in one fell