On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 20:38 +0100, guenther wrote:
> > Is there a way of collapsing the threads in the "View messages by
> > Thread" in a folder?
>
> Sure, click the small triangle at the left, next to the Subject in the
> mail list... ;-)
>
> Seriously, there is no way to collapse all threads in
On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 23:41 +0100, guenther wrote:
> > > > I can't say that Evo's behaviour is strictly wrong, since all it's doing
> > > > is what Firefox is telling it, i.e. create a message with a given Body.
> > > > The Evo developers could argue that adding an extra line in Normal
> > > > form
> > > take a look at http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=262601#c6 for
> > > the reasons.
> >
> > Different bug. Especially comment #6 just explains, why forwarding
> > quoted or inline does not include the attachments.
>
> hmm. after reading it again i have to say: yes, one can also read
On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 19:56 +0100, guenther wrote:
> > > > BTW I don't use the CVS versions. I did try a year or so ago but it was
> > > > just too much pain; 36 modules to compile
> > >
> > > 51 modules nowadays. :-)
> >
> > This is progress? :-(
>
> Probably yes. The entire Desktop is more int
good evening ladies and gentlemen,
Am Mittwoch, den 16.11.2005, 21:22 +0100 schrieb guenther:
> > take a look at http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=262601#c6 for
> > the reasons.
>
> Different bug. Especially comment #6 just explains, why forwarding
> quoted or inline does not include the
> > > I can't say that Evo's behaviour is strictly wrong, since all it's doing
> > > is what Firefox is telling it, i.e. create a message with a given Body.
> > > The Evo developers could argue that adding an extra line in Normal
> > > format is exceeding the spec.
> >
> > It would be nothing mor
Dear Guenther and list
(my original mail and your reply edited for length)
On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 13:06 +0100, guenther wrote:
[The part with two > > is from my original posting, GNR]
> > Dear Guenther and list,
> >The problem with forwarding mail as an attachment is that
> > you don't get t
I'm running Evolution-2.4.1 and gnome-pilot-2.0.13, and I setup the Pilot
settings to only sync with ECalendar from Evolution. All the other condiuts are
disabled.
When I push the HotSync button on my Palm Pilot Tungsten E, I get this message
from /usr/libexec/gpilotd:
gpilotd-Message: gnome-p
> > > It does seem to be a retrograde step that you can't over-ride the
> > > forwarding style at the time you do the forwarding - anyone any idea why
> > > it was changed?
> >
> > This very likely was removed during the massive menu structure changes.
> > *sigh* I do hope, this is just an oversi
heho guenther,
Am Mittwoch, den 16.11.2005, 18:48 +0100 schrieb guenther:
> > It does seem to be a retrograde step that you can't over-ride the
> > forwarding style at the time you do the forwarding - anyone any idea why
> > it was changed?
>
> This very likely was removed during the massive menu
> Is there a way of collapsing the threads in the "View messages by
> Thread" in a folder?
Sure, click the small triangle at the left, next to the Subject in the
mail list... ;-)
Seriously, there is no way to collapse all threads in one fell swoop,
unfortunately. I believe this already is filed
Is there a way of collapsing the threads in the "View messages by
Thread" in a folder?
Thanks
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolutio
On Mon, 2005-11-14 at 06:09 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 14:51 -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
> > Why is navigating the message list with the arrow keys so much slower
> > than using the mouse?
> >
> > When I push the down arrow to go to the mext message it seems like there
> > is a
> > > BTW I don't use the CVS versions. I did try a year or so ago but it was
> > > just too much pain; 36 modules to compile
> >
> > 51 modules nowadays. :-)
>
> This is progress? :-(
Probably yes. The entire Desktop is more integrated, rather than having
a bunch of totally independent apps th
> > It does seem to be a retrograde step that you can't over-ride the
> > forwarding style at the time you do the forwarding - anyone any idea why
> > it was changed?
>
> Not so good. :/
>
> This very likely was removed during the massive menu structure changes.
> *sigh* I do hope, this is just
On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 18:46 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 16.11.2005, 12:51 -0400 schrieb Patrick O'Callaghan:
> > BTW I don't use the CVS versions. I did try a year or so ago but it
> was
> > just too much pain; 36 modules to compile
>
> 51 modules nowadays. :-)
This is progress
> > Regarding forwarding: I do use "forward attached" exclusively, and I
> > believe this is the way to go. Nonetheless I think at least having the
> > options around as in 2.2 and previous versions is just fine, and they
> > should not be removed. Unfortunately I don't recall if this actually
> >
Am Mittwoch, den 16.11.2005, 12:51 -0400 schrieb Patrick O'Callaghan:
> BTW I don't use the CVS versions. I did try a year or so ago but it was
> just too much pain; 36 modules to compile
51 modules nowadays. :-)
andre
--
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | failed!
http://www.iomc.de
signature.asc
D
> > Please note that 2.5.x is unstable development work in progress... ;)
>
> Sure, but I've reported an apparent LDAP bug with 2.4 (and earlier) and
> was asked to try 2.5.1 to see if it was fixed. So far I haven't been
> able to.
OK, just wanted to make this clear. :)
Depending on your distro
On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 13:41 +0100, guenther wrote:
> > Note that the README for 2.5.1 is identical to that for 2.4.1. In
> fact
> > I've been unable to compile 2.5.1 because of config errors. I'm
> using
> > the exact same config options as for 2.4.1. An update to the README
> > would appear to be
On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 13:41 +0100, guenther wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 07:49 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 00:37 +0100, guenther wrote:
> > > Evo does not depend on gal since 2.4.
> >
> > >From the README of evo 2.4.1:
> >
> >* gal 2.4.0 or later
> >
> >
> > > This is the key. The "pick one" means that in your Compose window,
> > > the From line is actually a drop-down list, if you have multiple
> > > mail accounts defined.
> >
> > So I need to have a huge number of ID... my number of e-mail address
> > multiplied by my number of smtp server...
> Regarding forwarding: I do use "forward attached" exclusively, and I
> believe this is the way to go. Nonetheless I think at least having the
> options around as in 2.2 and previous versions is just fine, and they
> should not be removed. Unfortunately I don't recall if this actually
> vanished
hi trebor,
Am Montag, den 14.11.2005, 09:08 -0800 schrieb trebor iksrazal:
> Windows outlook and Thunderbird apparently have a
> feature, with pop3, to leave e-mail on the server
> after several days and then remove. I can't find this
> feature in evolution, does it have it?
no, unfortunately not
On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 07:49 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 00:37 +0100, guenther wrote:
> > Evo does not depend on gal since 2.4.
>
> >From the README of evo 2.4.1:
>
>* gal 2.4.0 or later
>
> ftp://ftp.gnome.org/pub/gnome/sources/gal
>
> If this
> Dear Guenther and list,
>The problem with forwarding mail as an attachment is that
> you don't get to edit it. This is unacceptable when dealing
> with personal matters and so I do not want it to be my default.
> This may be a feature that is needed in a business environment,
> but not for
On Mon, 2005-11-14 at 20:41 +0800, Lynda Metref wrote:
> >> Which version of Evolution is that?
> 2.4.1
>
> > This is the key. The "pick one" means that in your Compose window,
> > the From line is actually a drop-down list, if you have multiple
> > mail accounts defined.
>
> So I need to have a
On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 07:49 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 00:37 +0100, guenther wrote:
> > Evo does not depend on gal since 2.4.
>
> >From the README of evo 2.4.1:
>
>* gal 2.4.0 or later
>
> ftp://ftp.gnome.org/pub/gnome/sources/gal
>
> If this
Hi. I'm using Evolution 2.4.1, specifically 2.4.1-0ubuntu7
I'd like to publish free/busy data to a .mac account, but I can't seem to figure
out the proper "publishing location" to give to Evolution (calendar) via
Edit|Preferences|Free/Busy.
When viewing others calendars I use
http://ical.mac.com
Hello,
Арангел Ангов wrote in an email dated 15-Nov-05 20:36:
Mozilla Thunderbird supports UTF-8 that's for sure. I got complains from
two recipients using Thunderbird and since I've been using Thunderbird
for a long time before switching to Evo I thought that smth was wrong
with Evolution.
Ju
Hi all,
Windows outlook and Thunderbird apparently have a
feature, with pop3, to leave e-mail on the server
after several days and then remove. I can't find this
feature in evolution, does it have it?
iksrazal
"None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are
free. --
>> Which version of Evolution is that?
2.4.1
> This is the key. The "pick one" means that in your Compose window,
> the From line is actually a drop-down list, if you have multiple
> mail accounts defined.
So I need to have a huge number of ID... my number of e-mail address
multiplied by my num
On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 00:37 +0100, guenther wrote:
> Evo does not depend on gal since 2.4.
>From the README of evo 2.4.1:
* gal 2.4.0 or later
ftp://ftp.gnome.org/pub/gnome/sources/gal
If this is wrong, maybe someone should update the README.
Note that the README for 2.5.1
33 matches
Mail list logo
