I read most of these posts but don't reply unless I feel I have a relevant
comment. I feel compelled to post this. As a Linux enthusiast and an IT
Manager for a large company, I think it's very important to not count out
Microsoft and Exchange. Exchange does provides IMAP, POP3 and other
non
My title says it all:
Spamfiltering with evolution- Which one is better Bogofilter or
SpamAssassin
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 21:24 -0500, Paul Smith wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 07:50 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > My settings haven't changed since spam filtering used to work, and
> > they match what you are suggesting. All that's changed is the Evo
> > version.
> >
> > It *doesn't* work.
On Jan 17, 2008 7:56 AM, Art Alexion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Chris, I inadvertently deleted the sed script/command that you used.
> Could you please send it to me again?
Art,
I was not explicit on instructions when I wrote that, so I will
rewrite it again, with more clarity...
Note that I'm
Please, allow me to disagree.
For me Evolution runs smoothly. Makes what I need and that's enough for
me.
Of course I'm not working against an Exchange Server (that's really a
piece of crappy software). It works perfectly against POP or IMAP
server.
So could be the problem is not on Evolution bu
Il giorno gio, 17/01/2008 alle 09.29 -0500, Art Alexion ha scritto:
> > I made some test, and for me the problem is on appaointments that are
> > not for an entire day.
>
> I never have occasion to schedule all day appointments so I didn't know
> they worked.
>
> If I recall correctly, the ICS pr
Hi:
Way back in time I used to program Computers. At that time you used to
Think about what you wanted to do, then you would make a Flow Chart, of
the whole process. Then you would debug that. Then you would, take the
Flow Chart and translate that into Code. What's happening now, is
we got mi
On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 05:58 -0500, Ambrogio wrote:
> Il giorno ven, 11/01/2008 alle 08.53 -0500, Art Alexion ha scritto:
>
> > I have the same problem, but did not notice the difference between all
> > day and hour long appointments. I don't send invitations to all day
> > appointments. All that
> > >
> > > I have to agree ... Evolution has become a non-option for me when
> > > trying to pitch a linux desktop to corp offices. It just does not
> > > play.
> > >
> > > 3 or more years ago, EVO had lots of promise. Now, it is mostly a
> > > clunky interface with a few intriguing features b
On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 11:11 +, Pete Biggs wrote:
>
> >
> > I have to agree ... Evolution has become a non-option for me when
> > trying to pitch a linux desktop to corp offices. It just does not
> > play.
> >
> > 3 or more years ago, EVO had lots of promise. Now, it is mostly a
> > clunky i
> "Upgraded from Fedora 6 to Fedora 8" doesn't mean much to many of us: we
> have no idea what versions of Gnome or Evo come with those systems.
> Please provide version information for Evolution itself, not distro
> version information. I assume Fedora 8 is using Gnome 2.20 and Evo
> 2.12?
OK,
>
> I have to agree ... Evolution has become a non-option for me when
> trying to pitch a linux desktop to corp offices. It just does not
> play.
>
> 3 or more years ago, EVO had lots of promise. Now, it is mostly a
> clunky interface with a few intriguing features but too far behind to
> be re
Il giorno ven, 11/01/2008 alle 08.53 -0500, Art Alexion ha scritto:
> I have the same problem, but did not notice the difference between all
> day and hour long appointments. I don't send invitations to all day
> appointments. All that I knew was that Outlook couldn't process the
> invitations
On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 10:40 -0500, Rick Bilonick wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 10:20 -0500, Paul Smith wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 14:13 +, Nissen, Dave wrote:
> > > I would like to find out if the current version of Evolution will work
> > > in an Exchange 2007 organization that does no
Hi.
If it helps...
Im running eEvo 2.12.1 on Ubuntu 7.10 and spam filtering wokrs ok.
Cheers
El jue, 17-01-2008 a las 01:22 -0500, Paul Smith escribió:
> One thing that is curious: it seems to me that the people who are saying
> spam filtering doesn't work are using Fedora. The
15 matches
Mail list logo
