[Evolution] Top Post - Bottom Post [ was Re: stability/Jewett ]

2009-10-11 Thread Jonathan Ryshpan
Top Post - Good Bottom Post - Good Mixing Top Post and Bottom Post - Bad My own opinion - jon ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org

Re: [Evolution] Top Post - Bottom Post [ was Re: stability/Jewett ]

2009-10-11 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 10:09 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: Top Post - Good Bottom Post - Good Mixing Top Post and Bottom Post - Bad How about a thread where some people top-post and others bottom-post (leading to a mixture of both styles in the same quoted message)? If that

Re: [Evolution] Import address book

2009-10-11 Thread Sylvia Sánchez
Hum! Evolution 2.12 is a little bit older. In Evo 2.22 you choose FileImportImport from a file and then select the file. May be some words in the menu are not exactly in that way but this is it. I'm using the spanish version. Hope you find it useful Sylvia El dom, 11-10-2009 a las 22:28

Re: [Evolution] stability/stability

2009-10-11 Thread Jonathan Ryshpan
On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 09:28 +, Philipp Kubina wrote: I am working with Evolution for a month now (Ubuntu 9.04, Evolution 2.26.1) and the instability is terrible (multiple crashes every day). I too have had chronic stability problems with Evolution, namely evolution-2.26.3 running under

Re: [Evolution] Top Post - Bottom Post [ was Re: stability/Jewett ]

2009-10-11 Thread Adam Tauno Williams
Top Post - Good Bottom Post - Good Mixing Top Post and Bottom Post - Bad How about a thread where some people top-post and others bottom-post (leading to a mixture of both styles in the same quoted message)? If that is bad, why don't we just standardize ... Which is

Re: [Evolution] Top Post - Bottom Post [ was Re: stability/Jewett ]

2009-10-11 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 17:15 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: Top Post - Good Bottom Post - Good Mixing Top Post and Bottom Post - Bad How about a thread where some people top-post and others bottom-post (leading to a mixture of both styles in the same quoted

Re: [Evolution] stability/stability

2009-10-11 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 13:10 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 09:28 +, Philipp Kubina wrote: I am working with Evolution for a month now (Ubuntu 9.04, Evolution 2.26.1) and the instability is terrible (multiple crashes every day). I too have had chronic stability

Re: [Evolution] Top Post - Bottom Post [ was Re: stability/Jewett ]

2009-10-11 Thread Jonathan Ryshpan
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 13:29 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 10:09 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: Top Post - Good Bottom Post - Good Mixing Top Post and Bottom Post - Bad How about a thread where some people top-post and

[Evolution] Reply-To: field on the evolution list

2009-10-11 Thread Jonathan Ryshpan
There should be one. That is of the form: Reply-To: evolution-list@gnome.org Recently (and not for the first time) I hit Reply to a posting rather than Reply-to-All, and send a message to a poster when I meant to send it to the list. jon ___

Re: [Evolution] Reply-To: field on the evolution list

2009-10-11 Thread Pete Biggs
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 15:38 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: There should be one. That is of the form: Reply-To: evolution-list@gnome.org Recently (and not for the first time) I hit Reply to a posting rather than Reply-to-All, and send a message to a poster when I meant to send it to

Re: [Evolution] stability/stability

2009-10-11 Thread Jonathan Ryshpan
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 17:09 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: Have you reported them? Don't assume the devels know that there's a problem, and don't just report it here as most devels don't read the list. Well, I did it. Now I feel like an idiot. Briefly the description is Evolution

Re: [Evolution] stability/stability

2009-10-11 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 16:00 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 17:09 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: Have you reported them? Don't assume the devels know that there's a problem, and don't just report it here as most devels don't read the list. Well, I did it. Now I

Re: [Evolution] stability/stability

2009-10-11 Thread Jonathan Ryshpan
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 18:36 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 16:00 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 17:09 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: Have you reported them? Don't assume the devels know that there's a problem, and don't just report it here

Re: [Evolution] Reply-To: field on the evolution list

2009-10-11 Thread Ng Oon-Ee
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 16:08 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 23:56 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote: On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 15:38 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: There should be one. That is of the form: Reply-To: evolution-list@gnome.org Recently (and not for the first

Re: [Evolution] Reply-To: field on the evolution list

2009-10-11 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 16:08 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: If you want the message to go to the mailing list, hit Reply To List (Ctrl-L), not Reply to All, that will make your reply go to the proper place as derived from the mail headers and makes sure the person you are replying to

Re: [Evolution] Reply-To: field on the evolution list

2009-10-11 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 19:56 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: There is an outstanding request (from many years ago) for user-configurable keyboard shortcuts, which for some reason never seem to get any attention from the devels. I guess once they do that then a customizable icon bar (which

Re: [Evolution] Reply-To: field on the evolution list

2009-10-11 Thread B. Joshua Rosen
Matthew and the other developers, I think it's a terrible mistake to be adding any new features to Evolution until the bugs have been fixed. Nobody cares about customizable toolbars or keyboard shortcuts, those things can wait. Evolution is in a terrible state at the moment. It crashes all of the

Re: [Evolution] Reply-To: field on the evolution list

2009-10-11 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 09:14 +0800, Ng Oon-Ee wrote: On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 20:06 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote: On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 19:56 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: There is an outstanding request (from many years ago) for user-configurable keyboard shortcuts, which for some reason

Re: [Evolution] Need help with Caldav or WebDav support for group calendars

2009-10-11 Thread Adam Tauno Williams
On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 15:48 -0400, Steven Sprague wrote: Hell List, I have tried to setup a Webdav group calendar and use it with Apache - fails. I also tried to setup/create a Caldav calendar on the same server - not using Apache - fails. Does anyone have a setup for a group calendar

Re: [Evolution] New feature for Evolution

2009-10-11 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 23:32 -0300, Chapinha 2008 wrote: Hello, I couldn´t make an account in Evolution's development site, so I will make a proposal of a new feature for Evolution here. If you mean http://bugzilla.gnome.org (which is where you need to create a login to report bugs and

Re: [Evolution] Evolution-list Digest, Vol 51, Issue 20

2009-10-11 Thread Tim McConnell
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 03:57 +, evolution-list-requ...@gnome.org wrote: Matthew and the other developers, I think it's a terrible mistake to be adding any new features to Evolution until the bugs have been fixed. Nobody cares about customizable toolbars or keyboard shortcuts, those

Re: [Evolution] stability/stability

2009-10-11 Thread Paul Smith
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 16:21 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: Also, when mentioning a BZ report here on the list it's conventional to give the bug number (or better, the URL of the BZ page) in case someone wants to add anything. Also quite right. It's bug 528393.

Re: [Evolution] New feature for Evolution

2009-10-11 Thread Paul Smith
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 21:56 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 23:42 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: If you mean http://bugzilla.gnome.org (which is where you need to create a login to report bugs and enhancement requests such as this one), what exactly is the problem?