> Sorry to jump into someone elses thread, but this reminds me of a
> feature request.
>
> I'd like a "paste as plain text" option for Evolution.
>
> SHIFT-CTRL-V. I end up pasting into a text editor first and then
> recopy & paste to remove Evolutions crazy formatting.
>
> BTW, this helps some
On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 14:07 -0800, Bryan Karlan wrote:
> I want to try 2.29 to see what it has improved upon. I have little
> experience with Linux. I have Ubuntu 9.10. I have downloaded the
> file and have extracted it. However, I find no install or setup file
> as you would in Windows. I sti
Mandriva 2010, Gnome 2.28, Evolution 2.28.1. When attempting to send a
pgp signed message with an attachment whether I've previously entered my
passphrase or not Evo will lockup and the only way out is to kill it.
There are no issues with sending a msg with attachments if I don't sign
it nor if I s
On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 14:07 -0800, Bryan Karlan wrote:
> I want to try 2.29 to see what it has improved upon. I have little
> experience with Linux. I have Ubuntu 9.10. I have downloaded the
> file and have extracted it. However, I find no install or setup file
> as you would in Windows. I sti
On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 14:07 -0800, Bryan Karlan wrote:
> I want to try 2.29 to see what it has improved upon. I have little
> experience with Linux.
I'm afraid those two statements are incompatible! As others have said,
the odd point releases of most Gnome software are development versions
and a
On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 06:49 +0800, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 14:07 -0800, Bryan Karlan wrote:
> > I want to try 2.29 to see what it has improved upon. I have little
> > experience with Linux. I have Ubuntu 9.10. I have downloaded the
> > file and have extracted it. However, I fin
There is not a direct analog to downloading source and compiling it
(which you would have to do in this case) and what you describe in
Windows. For windows, someone would have already compiled it and wrapped
the installer around it: For Linux, that is what the Distro does when
they create the .deb/
On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 14:07 -0800, Bryan Karlan wrote:
> I want to try 2.29 to see what it has improved upon. I have little
> experience with Linux. I have Ubuntu 9.10. I have downloaded the
> file and have extracted it. However, I find no install or setup file
> as you would in Windows. I sti
On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 22:07 +, evolution-list-requ...@gnome.org
wrote:
> I want to try 2.29 to see what it has improved upon. I have
> little
> experience with Linux. I have Ubuntu 9.10. I have downloaded
> the file
> and have extracted it. However, I
I want to try 2.29 to see what it has improved upon. I have little
experience with Linux. I have Ubuntu 9.10. I have downloaded the file
and have extracted it. However, I find no install or setup file as you
would in Windows. I still can't understand why in Linux such simple
things are made so
On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 14:02 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 12:29 -0600, John Lange wrote:
> > In every programming language I've used, plus things like OpenOffice
> > mentioned above, the number of formatting options for dates and times
> > is mind numbing. So, I would have to
On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 12:29 -0600, John Lange wrote:
> In every programming language I've used, plus things like OpenOffice
> mentioned above, the number of formatting options for dates and times
> is mind numbing. So, I would have to think that "yes", there are
> many-many variations. Given that o
On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 13:06 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> > You can write there almost anything. It's using strftime internally,
> > thus it understands all format specifiers from it, plus a special one
> > "%ad". There is an obvious lack of information in user docs, though
> > I'm not sure whethe
> You can write there almost anything. It's using strftime internally,
> thus it understands all format specifiers from it, plus a special one
> "%ad". There is an obvious lack of information in user docs, though
> I'm not sure whether a regular user would understand all those %.. tags.
Speaking o
On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 15:50 +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> I hadn't noticed it was editable. That's good. Not sure about the %ad
> format though (I can see it tries to be smart about "today",
> "yesterday"
> etc. but for dates further in the past it seems to fall back to one of
> the standard
On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 13:47 +0100, Milan Crha wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 10:44 +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > I see that in 2.28 Edit->Preferences->Mail Preferences->Headers now
> > allows you to select alternative date formats for displayed message
> > headers (maybe it's
Hi,
On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 10:44 +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> I see that in 2.28 Edit->Preferences->Mail Preferences->Headers now
> allows you to select alternative date formats for displayed message
> headers (maybe it's been around for a while but I'd never noticed it
> before).
I
I see that in 2.28 Edit->Preferences->Mail Preferences->Headers now
allows you to select alternative date formats for displayed message
headers (maybe it's been around for a while but I'd never noticed it
before). Two things occur to me:
1) It would be nice to be able to add more formats, e.g. I l
On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 11:07 +0530, Akhil Laddha wrote:
> Second problem has been fixed in 2.29.2
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=570835
Thank you Akhil. I'll apply the patch.
--
Kip Warner -- Software Developer
President & CEO Kshatra Corp.
OpenPGP encrypted/signed mail preferred
19 matches
Mail list logo
