Re: [Evolution] The attached email causes evo to consume 50% of dual cpu and all ram until killed

2010-03-17 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 15:23 -0400, Reid Thompson wrote: > Re-sending, as original doesn't appear to have made it to the list. It did. Did you check the archives before resending? poc ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.

[Evolution] Evolution QA tool.

2010-03-17 Thread Soohong Min
Dear all, I want to know how to measure memory and CPU for automation test. What kind of tools was used to measure the performance. Thanks Soohong ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-

Re: [Evolution] How to mail from a local spool file?

2010-03-17 Thread Jonathan Ryshpan
On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 12:37 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 09:43 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: > > I'm having trouble fetching mail from a local spool file in my Linux > > system... > > Questions: > > 1. Is there anything obvious wrong with the setup? Any bugs th

Re: [Evolution] How to mail from a local spool file?

2010-03-17 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 09:43 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: > I'm having trouble fetching mail from a local spool file in my Linux > system. I have edited > Preferenced->Mail Accounts->Protocol=Spool->Receiving Email > to have > Server Type = Standard Unix mbox spool file >

[Evolution] How to mail from a local spool file?

2010-03-17 Thread Jonathan Ryshpan
I'm having trouble fetching mail from a local spool file in my Linux system. I have edited Preferenced->Mail Accounts->Protocol=Spool->Receiving Email to have Server Type = Standard Unix mbox spool file path =/var/spool/mail/jonrysh This shows up as just "

Re: [Evolution] letter

2010-03-17 Thread Adam Tauno Williams
On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 08:48 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 06:16 +0100, JULES MONTJOIE wrote: > > Sir, > > I will stop the message with evolution . > > I have a crash with evolution . > > I will to stop the contact because I work with yahoo. > > Thank you > > Evolution-l

Re: [Evolution] IMAP vs. POP

2010-03-17 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 08:42 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 05:13 -0600, Bart wrote: > > Hope this is not too far off topic. > > I am using pop for all my email accounts. I receive all my mail on one > > machine at one location. But I keep seeing remarks that indicate IM

Re: [Evolution] reply to list

2010-03-17 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 12:50 +0100, randall wrote: > hi all, > > i'm new with evolution and noticed that i replied twice today to this > mailing list and forgot to remove the CC recipient when using the reply > to all button. > i did found the CTRL + L now, but i was wondering if its possible to >

Re: [Evolution] letter

2010-03-17 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 06:16 +0100, JULES MONTJOIE wrote: > Sir, > I will stop the message with evolution . > I have a crash with evolution . > I will to stop the contact because I work with yahoo. > Thank you > > ___ > Evolution-list mailing list > Evolu

Re: [Evolution] IMAP vs. POP

2010-03-17 Thread Adam Tauno Williams
On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 12:39 +0100, randall wrote: > On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 05:13 -0600, Bart wrote: > > Hope this is not too far off topic. > > I am using pop for all my email accounts. I receive all my mail on one > > machine at one location. But I keep seeing remarks that indicate IMAP > > as be

Re: [Evolution] IMAP vs. POP

2010-03-17 Thread Adam Tauno Williams
On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 05:13 -0600, Bart wrote: > Hope this is not too far off topic. > I am using pop for all my email accounts. I receive all my mail on one > machine at one location. But I keep seeing remarks that indicate IMAP > as being just "SO" much better. > Would someone either explain or

[Evolution] reply to list

2010-03-17 Thread randall
hi all, i'm new with evolution and noticed that i replied twice today to this mailing list and forgot to remove the CC recipient when using the reply to all button. i did found the CTRL + L now, but i was wondering if its possible to easily add a "reply to list" button Thanks ___

Re: [Evolution] IMAP vs. POP

2010-03-17 Thread randall
On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 05:13 -0600, Bart wrote: > Hope this is not too far off topic. > > I am using pop for all my email accounts. I receive all my mail on one > machine at one location. But I keep seeing remarks that indicate IMAP > as being just "SO" much better. > > Would someone either expl

[Evolution] IMAP vs. POP

2010-03-17 Thread Bart
Hope this is not too far off topic. I am using pop for all my email accounts. I receive all my mail on one machine at one location. But I keep seeing remarks that indicate IMAP as being just "SO" much better. Would someone either explain or point me to a place where I can learn the reasons for

Re: [Evolution] 2.92.91 imap-idle

2010-03-17 Thread randall
On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 07:38 +0100, randall wrote: > On Tue, 2010-03-16 at 14:39 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: > > On Tue, 2010-03-16 at 16:38 +0100, randall wrote: > > > anyways.. im interested in the improved IMAP support > > > > > > i’m running 2.29.91 on Ubuntu 10.04 beta from ppa at > > > https

[Evolution] changing To: / Cc: on group-reply

2010-03-17 Thread Matthias Apitz
Hello, We have the company rule that the To: of a given mail must act or reply while the Cc: gets only informed (copied). That's why on group-reply sometimes I'd like to change the order of To: and Cc: ... is there some way to do so w/o cut&paste the content of both fields? In mutt while composi