Re: [Evolution] Reply for list messages should go back to the list

2010-07-16 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 18:43 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 12:12 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > Perhaps the "reply to all" nag could have a configurable threshold, but > > it's no big deal. > > Yeah, I thought about that too, but couldn't be bothered. It's only a > pr

Re: [Evolution] Reply for list messages should go back to the list

2010-07-16 Thread David Woodhouse
On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 12:12 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > Perhaps the "reply to all" nag could have a configurable threshold, but > it's no big deal. Yeah, I thought about that too, but couldn't be bothered. It's only a prompt to make you think; it doesn't have to be precise. Besides, the k

Re: [Evolution] Reply for list messages should go back to the list

2010-07-16 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 12:12 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > Perhaps you should post your detailed proposal (including an > explanation of the nags) to the BZ page to make it more > "official" (and more likely to be seen by the Evo devels). I just noticed you already did this before I replied.

Re: [Evolution] Reply for list messages should go back to the list

2010-07-16 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 17:21 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 11:45 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > OT: This is just to note that David's last reply has now fallen off the > > right-hand edge of my (landscape-mode) screen, i.e. I can't see even the > > first character of t

Re: [Evolution] Reply for list messages should go back to the list

2010-07-16 Thread Pete Biggs
On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 17:21 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 11:45 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > OT: This is just to note that David's last reply has now fallen off the > > right-hand edge of my (landscape-mode) screen, i.e. I can't see even the > > first character of t

Re: [Evolution] Reply for list messages should go back to the list

2010-07-16 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 16:57 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 11:15 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 16:09 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > > > On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 18:42 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > > And there are probably an equal number

Re: [Evolution] Evolution losts mail accounts :-(

2010-07-16 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 13:03 +0200, Andre Schmidt wrote: > OS: Debian Lenny/Gnome > Evolution Version: 2.22.3.1 I don't have an immediate answer to your problem, but note that 2.22.x is an obsolete version of Evolution that no longer has any support. The current stable version is 2.30.2. poc

Re: [Evolution] Reply for list messages should go back to the list

2010-07-16 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 15:12 +, Pete Biggs wrote: > What I think is rude and unacceptable are the people who write a > message to a list where *they* are asking for help and they say "don't > forget to CC: me in any replies because I don't want to read the > list". If you are asking for help, at

Re: [Evolution] Reply for list messages should go back to the list

2010-07-16 Thread David Woodhouse
On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 11:45 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > OT: This is just to note that David's last reply has now fallen off the > right-hand edge of my (landscape-mode) screen, i.e. I can't see even the > first character of the Subject. Do you mean the 'R' for 'Reply' which is the first c

Re: [Evolution] Reply for list messages should go back to the list

2010-07-16 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
OT: This is just to note that David's last reply has now fallen off the right-hand edge of my (landscape-mode) screen, i.e. I can't see even the first character of the Subject. Hurray for nested threads! So there's another topic to take up when we're done with the list issue :-) poc

Re: [Evolution] Reply for list messages should go back to the list

2010-07-16 Thread David Woodhouse
On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 15:12 +, Pete Biggs wrote: > > > > > What I would like is for the Reply-to-List to be more prominent to > > > encourage people to use that rather than just blindly replying to the > > > user. > > > > Certainly I'm with you on the 'rather than just blindly replying to the

Re: [Evolution] Reply for list messages should go back to the list

2010-07-16 Thread Pete Biggs
> > > What I would like is for the Reply-to-List to be more prominent to > > encourage people to use that rather than just blindly replying to the > > user. > > Certainly I'm with you on the 'rather than just blindly replying to the > user' bit -- there's now a pop-up which will say "you're repl

Re: [Evolution] Cannot Create New or Delete Existing Categories

2010-07-16 Thread Arthur Machlas
On 7/16/10, Sylvia Sánchez wrote: > > > El vie, 16-07-2010 a las 09:15 +0200, Jo-Erlend Schinstad escribió: > >> I remember that bug from earlier. It's not reproducible in 2.28.3, so >> it's probably probably crept back in for 2.30. I don't have it >> installed, so I can't test it. The categories

Re: [Evolution] Cannot Create New or Delete Existing Categories

2010-07-16 Thread Sylvia Sánchez
El vie, 16-07-2010 a las 09:15 +0200, Jo-Erlend Schinstad escribió: > I remember that bug from earlier. It's not reproducible in 2.28.3, so > it's probably probably crept back in for 2.30. I don't have it > installed, so I can't test it. The categories used to be > removed/refreshed whenever you

Re: [Evolution] Reply for list messages should go back to the list

2010-07-16 Thread Sylvia Sánchez
El jue, 15-07-2010 a las 16:09 +0100, David Woodhouse escribió: > On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 18:42 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > And there are probably an equal number who believe the contrary, like > > me, but let's not argue about it. I think Paul's suggestion that the > > default behaviour

Re: [Evolution] Reply for list messages should go back to the list

2010-07-16 Thread David Woodhouse
On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 12:44 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote: > OK. So it's not just any List-*: header, there's a specific list of > headers it needs (with specific formats in some cases). Fine, that > explains why my test didn't work. Thanks for explaining it. Arguably we should fix things so that it's

Re: [Evolution] Reply for list messages should go back to the list

2010-07-16 Thread Pete Biggs
> > > > > > The operation *does*. You're getting confused by the fact that the > > > current menu items get disabled when you're not looking at a list > > > message. > > > > > > But actually, some lists don't have a List-Post: header. If there are > > > *any* List-* headers, you'll see the list

[Evolution] Evolution losts mail accounts :-(

2010-07-16 Thread Andre Schmidt
Hello, during the work evolution send the hint, I should entry my passwords for my mail accounts. I was wondering, cause all the datas are stored. I closed evolution. After restarting, evolution want to create new account like the first startup of evolution. I have nothing changed on my serve

Re: [Evolution] Reply for list messages should go back to the list

2010-07-16 Thread David Woodhouse
On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 11:09 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote: > > > > Remember, the existing reply-to-list operation *already* falls back > > > > to replying to all if it can't find a List-Post: header. > > > > > > No it doesn't. > > > > The operation *does*. You're getting confused by the fact that the

Re: [Evolution] Reply for list messages should go back to the list

2010-07-16 Thread Pete Biggs
> > > Remember, the existing reply-to-list operation *already* falls back > > > to replying to all if it can't find a List-Post: header. > > > > No it doesn't. > > The operation *does*. You're getting confused by the fact that the > current menu items get disabled when you're not looking at a

Re: [Evolution] Reply for list messages should go back to the list

2010-07-16 Thread David Woodhouse
On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 16:46 +1000, Andrew Cowie wrote: > On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 10:14 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > An obvious solution to this is to do what Kmail does. When the message > > being replied to contains a List-Post header, Ctrl-R should do the same > > as Ctrl-L. There should a

Re: [Evolution] Reply for list messages should go back to the list

2010-07-16 Thread David Woodhouse
On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 09:15 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote: > And I think it extremely rude for someone to effectively say "I want to > say something but I can't be arsed to find out what anyone else has to > say. My time is more important than yours so please send the messages > directly to me to save me

Re: [Evolution] Cannot Create New or Delete Existing Categories

2010-07-16 Thread Jo-Erlend Schinstad
I remember that bug from earlier. It's not reproducible in 2.28.3, so it's probably probably crept back in for 2.30. I don't have it installed, so I can't test it. The categories used to be removed/refreshed whenever you restartet Evolution. Is it still that way? And are you talking about notes, ta