Re: [Evolution] Regenerating addressbook.db

Ugh, I have an additional problem: what if someone has multiple homes? In Evolution, I edited a contact with two home phone numbers, so it looks like: TEL;TYPE=CELL;X-EVOLUTION-UI-SLOT=3:1 613 something # shows up TEL;TYPE=HOME,VOICE;X-EVOLUTION-UI-SLOT=2:1 613 something2 # shows up TEL;TYPE=H

Re: [Evolution] Length of To: filed

Am Donnerstag, den 16.12.2010, 11:09 -0500 schrieb Dragan Jurkovic: > Would someone care to explain why top post is bad? Sure: Answer: No. Question: Do you start reading an email at the bottom? andre -- mailto:ak...@gmx.net | failed http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper

Re: [Evolution] Length of To: filed

>> Would someone care to explain why top post is bad? > > No, this has been documented and discussed *to death* in a zillion > places and times. > > >

Re: [Evolution] Preview frame cursor jumping to top after clicking on link

Dear Milan et al, On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 02:46 -0500, Milan Crha wrote: > On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 17:43 -0500, George Reeke wrote: > > Dear colleagues, > >This problem probably more properly should be sent to a > > RedHat bugzilla because it refers to an older version of > > evolution, and I will

Re: [Evolution] Length of To: filed

On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 11:09 -0500, Dragan Jurkovic wrote: > Would someone care to explain why top post is bad? No, this has been documented and discussed *to death* in a zillion places and times.

Re: [Evolution] Length of To: filed

Would someone care to explain why top post is bad? I wouldn't like to make similar mistakes in the future. BTW message has been sent by our external partner's MTA - Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959). Message saved in Sent folder is fine, message received by recipients had To: list replaced with "un

Re: [Evolution] Length of To: filed

On Thursday 16 Dec 2010 13:31:16 Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 14:22 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote: > > Yes. > > Wow, this is an excellent example of how top posting is bad. > > Yes, what? Be warned: this one understands irony. ___ ev

Re: [Evolution] Length of To: filed

Am Donnerstag, den 16.12.2010, 08:31 -0500 schrieb Adam Tauno Williams: > On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 14:22 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote: > > Yes. > > Wow, this is an excellent example of how top posting is bad. Yes, in response to the previous posting full quoting and top posting, and you perfectly expl

Re: [Evolution] Length of To: filed

On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 14:22 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote: > Yes. Wow, this is an excellent example of how top posting is bad. Yes, what? > Am Donnerstag, den 16.12.2010, 07:59 -0500 schrieb Dragan Jurkovic: > > Message in Sent folder is OK. Could it be MTA that is doing this? Your MTA should not

Re: [Evolution] Length of To: filed

Yes. Am Donnerstag, den 16.12.2010, 07:59 -0500 schrieb Dragan Jurkovic: > Message in Sent folder is OK. Could it be MTA that is doing this? > > Dragan > > On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 2:06 PM, Andre Klapper wrote: [Removing unneeded full-quote of previous message] -- mailto:ak...@gmx.net | failed

Re: [Evolution] Length of To: filed

Message in Sent folder is OK. Could it be MTA that is doing this? Dragan On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 2:06 PM, Andre Klapper wrote: > Am Mittwoch, den 15.12.2010, 13:46 -0500 schrieb Dragan Jurkovic: >> Evolution 2.28.3 on 64 bit Ubuntu 10.04. I have one especially long >> To: list (950 characters).