Re: [Evolution] Evo/Linux-Friendly ISP

2014-04-16 Thread Bart
On Wed, 2014-04-16 at 12:08 +0100, G.W. Haywood wrote: > Since your ISP is clearly incompetent, > which means that it is very unlikely that they will be doing that, you > could simply tell them that your copy of Evolution is running on a > Windows box. Then ask them for help. They'll never know

Re: [Evolution] bug during transition from V2 to V3

2014-04-16 Thread Milan Crha
On Wed, 2014-04-16 at 14:55 +0200, Anglade Pierre-Matthieu wrote: > If I'm understanding correctly your advice, the best would be to get > ride of the old data. And then importing again in a newly configured > evolution. If that's right, I'm intending to proceed the following > way : > 1) Moving a

Re: [Evolution] bug during transition from V2 to V3

2014-04-16 Thread Anglade Pierre-Matthieu
Thank you Milan and Patrick for help. After witnessing no message with strace -p, I've killed evolution main process and subprocesses (evolution-sourc.., evolution-alarm, evolution-calen...). A weird detail is I have no ~/.evolution. All I can find in my home are the following : "" ~ $ find . -n

Re: [Evolution] Evo/Linux-Friendly ISP

2014-04-16 Thread Marc Hurst
Hello Milan: The problem began when the ISP applied a "Heartbleed" fix. They claim that was the only change that day. My Evo Pop email accounts (mine and my wife's) stopped working immediately. I've tried Evo with IMAP and IMAP+; they don't work either. Firefox and Icedove (Thunderbird) work

Re: [Evolution] Evo/Linux-Friendly ISP

2014-04-16 Thread G.W. Haywood
Hi there, On Tue, 15 Apr 2014, Marc Hurst wrote: Can anyone recommend an ISP in the United States that is Linux friendly? My current ISP recently updated their servers; and now they do not communicate with Evolution on my Debian Linux machines. They are unwilling and/or unable to test their se

Re: [Evolution] Evolution

2014-04-16 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Wed, 2014-04-16 at 12:56 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Wed, 2014-04-16 at 12:47 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: > > By the way, is the account an IMAP+ account? > > All accounts are POP accounts. > > > >> evolution 3.10.4-1 > > >> evolution-data-server 3.10.4-1 > > >> gnome-desktop 1:3.10.2-1 > > >

Re: [Evolution] Evolution

2014-04-16 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Wed, 2014-04-16 at 12:47 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: > By the way, is the account an IMAP+ account? All accounts are POP accounts. > >> evolution 3.10.4-1 > >> evolution-data-server 3.10.4-1 > >> gnome-desktop 1:3.10.2-1 > >> > >> doesn't solve all issues. I guess downgrading does solve all issu

Re: [Evolution] Evolution

2014-04-16 Thread Milan Crha
On Wed, 2014-04-16 at 11:57 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Wed, 2014-04-16 at 11:27 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: > > it would be really helpful if you could be more specific > > Please read: > https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/2014-April/035919.html OK, I copy&pasted the problems

Re: [Evolution] Feature Request Reaccept Certificate

2014-04-16 Thread Christian
Thanks for the detailed information. Yes I also filled in a Feature Request in the Bugzilla... Still I am not quite sure if this is the right way to do so. It actually is not a bug... Hopefully there will be some more UI stuff in those. Since this happens not every day it might be forgotten very

Re: [Evolution] Evolution

2014-04-16 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Wed, 2014-04-16 at 11:27 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: > it would be really helpful if you could be more specific Please read: https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/2014-April/035919.html After downgrading the password issue is solved. After downgrading the send and receive window do

Re: [Evolution] Feature Request Reaccept Certificate

2014-04-16 Thread Milan Crha
On Tue, 2014-04-15 at 22:25 +0200, Christian wrote: > After accidental rejecting a certificate permanently I searched about 5 > hours for a solution to re-allow the certificate. It would be nice to > have list where you can reallow the certificates you rejected > permanently. I searched first at th

Re: [Evolution] Evolution

2014-04-16 Thread Milan Crha
On Tue, 2014-04-15 at 22:02 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > here Evolution 3.12.1 has so many bugs, that I won't write tons of bug > reports, but ask you to provide Evolution 3.10.4 by the Arch repository > again. > > I Cc to upstream, since it's not the first time that upstream released a > version

Re: [Evolution] bug during transition from V2 to V3

2014-04-16 Thread Milan Crha
On Tue, 2014-04-15 at 14:07 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > Size of the mailstore > > * I'm not sure of the mailstore location. Here is what I currently have on > > disk : > > $ du -ms .local/share/evolution/mail/ .config/evolution/mail/ > > 3500.local/share/evolution/mail/ > > 2 .c

Re: [Evolution] Capturing SSL traffic between evolution-ews and outlook.com

2014-04-16 Thread Robert Munteanu
Hi Milan, On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 11:49 AM, Milan Crha wrote: > On Tue, 2014-04-15 at 15:06 +0300, Robert Munteanu wrote: >> Is there some way I can debug this problem? Alternatively, is there >> any way I can capture HTTPS traffic originating from Evolution-EWS? > > Hi, > I do not know w

Re: [Evolution] Evo/Linux-Friendly ISP

2014-04-16 Thread Milan Crha
On Mon, 2014-04-14 at 12:05 -0400, Marc Hurst wrote: > My current ISP recently updated their servers; and now they do not > communicate with Evolution on my Debian Linux machines. Hello, is only evolution affected, aka is other network related process fine, like Firefox (or your web brows

Re: [Evolution] Capturing SSL traffic between evolution-ews and outlook.com

2014-04-16 Thread Milan Crha
On Tue, 2014-04-15 at 15:06 +0300, Robert Munteanu wrote: > Is there some way I can debug this problem? Alternatively, is there > any way I can capture HTTPS traffic originating from Evolution-EWS? Hi, I do not know what you are trying to achieve, but if you are just going to see what's go