On Sat, 2015-09-12 at 13:42 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
> I find that sometimes it takes a while for ALL entries in the EWS
> calendar to eventually show up in a newly configured calendar - no
> matter how many refreshes I do. (A while = a couple of days.) I
> don't know if that is an Evolution or
On Mon, 2015-09-14 at 12:50 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
> On Sat, 2015-09-12 at 13:42 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
> > I find that sometimes it takes a while for ALL entries in the EWS
> > calendar to eventually show up in a newly configured calendar - no
> > matter how many refreshes I do. (A while = a
On Fri, 2015-09-11 at 09:27 +0200, Bjørn T Johansen wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Sep 2015 08:21:07 +0200
> Bjørn T Johansen wrote:
>
> > I keep getting this error when I try to mark mail as read in my
> > trash folder:
> >
> > Error while Storing folder 'Trash'.
> > The
On Mon, 2015-09-14 at 09:51 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
> > Hoping not to go too far OT, but what's the advantage over rsync in
> > this
> > context ?
> >
>
> Because it does versioning.
>
> See http://www.mikerubel.org/computers/rsync_snapshots/ (which is
> what rsnapshot is based on)
That site
RSnapShot allows you to do incremental backups (using hardlinks) vs
Rsync which you would have to script to do what rsnapshot does.
Honestly, if you don't care for point-in-time backups, then just use
rsync. I use them both on a case-by-case basis.
On 09/13/15 11:19, Tom wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den
On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 16:33:21 +0100
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-09-11 at 09:27 +0200, Bjørn T Johansen wrote:
> > On Tue, 8 Sep 2015 08:21:07 +0200
> > Bjørn T Johansen wrote:
> >
> > > I keep getting this error when I try to mark mail as read in my
>
> Hoping not to go too far OT, but what's the advantage over rsync in this
> context ?
>
Because it does versioning.
See http://www.mikerubel.org/computers/rsync_snapshots/ (which is what
rsnapshot is based on)
P.
___
evolution-list mailing list