OK, thank you for this clarification.
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 5:59 AM, Milan Crha <mc...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Sun, 2015-11-15 at 11:44 -0200, Jorge wrote: >> Does this mean that evolution searches return >> incomplete results? > > Hi, > the LDAP always has some limits, one is for time (if the server doesn't > respond in some time period) or the amount of entries being returned, > like your log shows the later is set to max 100 entries. > >> When I searched for Porphirio, there were no results (Evolution kept >> "searching" for minutes). I then opened Claws mail, searched >> Porphirio, and he was there. Then I went back to Evolution and >> searched it again, and now there were results. > > Your log shows that the contacts were returned, but then the search > failed on the time constraint. The reason why you get the results > immediately in the second try is that it comes from the local cache, it > doesn't wait for the LDAP server to report the search being completed. > > The compare with the Claws mail might be inaccurate, it can use > different search options than you use in the Evolution. Your log shows > that you search with "any field contains" or similar search option, > which can be complicated (it can take a long time) on the server side > to check in all provided fields in all stored entries. Using filter > like 'Name contains', or 'E-mail contains' might make the search > quicker on the server side, especially if the server index these > fields. > Bye, > Milan > _______________________________________________ > evolution-list mailing list > evolution-list@gnome.org > To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list _______________________________________________ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
