Dear Milan
On Wed, 2016-05-18 at 10:30 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
> This email is a plea for an opinion on the attachment bar issue from
> the user point of view.
I never even noticed the attachment bar you are talking about between
the headers and the message. Always use the one at the bottom of
On Wed, 2016-05-18 at 11:03 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-05-18 at 15:33 +0200, Andrea Vai wrote:
> > ...the "Save all" button...
>
> +1
Hi,
having there [*] only a summary of the attachments with the Save All
button is easy, the problematic part is the icon/list view
On Wed, 2016-05-18 at 14:28 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
> That said, if I put my mind to it, I could easily switch to using the
> top attachment bar! It is a more consistent way of dealing with
> attachments in the context of Gnome.
Hi,
I guess it's a typo, because the idea is to move the
On Wed, 2016-05-18 at 15:33 +0200, Andrea Vai wrote:
> [...]
> > Does this change sound sane, from the user point of view?
> > Do you use the attachment bar at all?
> > Any other opinion?
> I am a heavy user of evo 3.18.5.2 and I hardly ever use the
> attachment bar (I prefer to use the
Hi Milan,
Il giorno mer, 18/05/2016 alle 10.30 +0200, Milan Crha ha scritto:
> Hello,
>
> [...]
>
>
> Does this change sound sane, from the user point of view?
> Do you use the attachment bar at all?
> Any other opinion?
>
I am a heavy user of evo 3.18.5.2 and I hardly ever use the
>
> Does this change sound sane, from the user point of view?
> Do you use the attachment bar at all?
Personally, I don't use the attachment bar at the top of the message
very much, virtually all the interaction I have with attachments is via
the bottom attachment list. But I think that is
On Wed, 2016-05-18 at 09:29 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
>
> Your distribution should have some sort of build system, where users
> might be able to check what sources had been used to build the package
> and what packages had been installed when the build was made. For
> example Fedora has Koji (
On Wed, 2016-05-18 at 11:31 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-05-18 at 11:23 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> >
> > sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get dist-upgrade
> >
> > sudo apt-get build-dep webkitgtk
> >
> > apt-get -b webkitgtk && sudo dpkg -i *deb
> apt-get -b source webkitgtk
On Wed, 2016-05-18 at 01:07 +0200, Ángel González wrote:
> > > C. Gmail simply throws away the second one (remember that
> > > Gmail is really an interface to a database) though haven't
> checked
> > > this.
> >
> > This has been hypothesised but I can't think of a reliable way to
> > test
Hi,
On Wed, 18 May 2016 09:29:14 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
>Note that you can build against one version of the library and run
>against another, especially when the two library versions do not change
>API/ABI.
I already explained this, but my mails are censored. However, the sense
of building
On Tue, 17 May 2016 09:42:25 -0700, Dave Cole wrote:
>When I do the same I get:
>root@nostromo:/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu# ls -Ggl /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-
>gnu/libwebkitgtk-3.0.so.0.22.17
>-rw-r--r-- 1 33003232 Apr 11 06:10 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-
>gnu/libwebkitgtk-3.0.so.0.22.17
>
>The only
On Tue, 2016-05-17 at 17:52 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-05-17 at 07:41 -0700, Dave Cole wrote:
> > I installed the stock webkit supplied in the testing channel. All
> > software here save Google Chrome has been installed via Synaptic...
> >
> > I am new enough to Linux, (a few
On Wed, 2016-05-18 at 10:52 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-05-18 at 10:22 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > If it was build against 3.18, nothing should break when 3.20 is
> > provided at runtime.
>
> except of the selected color.
Regarding the idea of soname and backwards-compatibility it
On Tue, 2016-05-17 at 07:41 -0700, Dave Cole wrote:
> I installed the stock webkit supplied in the testing channel. All
> software here save Google Chrome has been installed via Synaptic...
>
> I am new enough to Linux, (a few years), that I do not know how to
> find
> out what version of gtk,
Hi,
On Wed, 18 May 2016 09:29:14 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
>Note that you can build against one version of the library and run
>against another, especially when the two library versions do not change
>API/ABI.
I already explained this, but my mails are censored and sometimes Claws
and Evolution
>In any case, the pointer to the tracker was helpful. The right package
>is webkitgtk, not webkit2gtk
Oops, I used the wrong link in the Firefox tabs :D.
My bad, so upgrading doesn't solve the issue. The OP needs to rebuild
the package against the current installed libgtk3.
The source list repo
On Wed, 2016-05-18 at 10:22 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> If it was build against 3.18, nothing should break when 3.20 is
> provided at runtime.
Hi,
except of the selected color. As I said earlier, the code in WebKitGTK+
is conditionally compiled. It means, if the build is built against
Hello,
there is an ongoing effort to port Evolution to use WebKit2
(WebKitGTK4), instead of the old WebKit1 (WebKitGTK3). The WebKit1 is
not actively maintained by upstream, thus has many issues. The upstream
focuses on the WebKit2 development, which makes perfect sense. By the
port of the
On Tue, 2016-05-17 at 22:38 -0700, Dave Cole wrote:
> That was exciting, I have zero idea what this is telling me, save
> this
> single line:
>
> SONAME libwebkitgtk-3.0.so.0
>
> See command below and results for more data:
Hi,
I'm also not sure what this is supposed to
19 matches
Mail list logo
