On Fri, 2016-08-05 at 00:00 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-08-04 at 23:35 +0200, Rudolf Künzli wrote:
> >
> > I was much younger, in the 1985 I had an email function (BSD Unix)
> > with
> > that one I could bounce a message.
> > I did get an disliked message and I
> > could just
On Fri, 2016-08-05 at 05:47 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-08-05 at 00:00 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> >
> > As Adam already mentioned, there is a Redirect feature (it's under
> > Message->Forward though semantically it doesn't really belong there
> > IMHO). This is something
On Thu, 2016-08-04 at 23:35 +0200, Rudolf Künzli wrote:
> I was much younger, in the 1985 I had an email function (BSD Unix) with
> that one I could bounce a message.
> I did get an disliked message and I
> could just hit "bounce" instead of "reply"...
> I simply did ask if such a
> feature
On Thu, 2016-08-04 at 23:04 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-08-04 at 21:37 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> >
> > All that does is confirm that your address receives mail. They can
> > then set up a different sender and keep spamming you. The spam we get
> > on the list (filtered by
--
Rudolf Künzli - rudolf.kun...@gmail.com
Skype: rudolf.kunzli
On Thu, 2016-08-04 at 23:04 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-08-04 at 21:37 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > All that does is confirm that your address receives mail. They can
> > > > then set up a different sender
On Thu, 2016-08-04 at 22:20 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-08-04 at 21:58 +0200, Rudolf Künzli wrote:
> > The message was not clear.
> > I have some people sending me messages I don't like.
> > Naturally I could set up a filter and delete them automatically.
> > But I like to let them
On Thu, 2016-08-04 at 21:37 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> All that does is confirm that your address receives mail. They can
> then set up a different sender and keep spamming you. The spam we get
> on the list (filtered by your friendly moderators so you mostly don't
> see it) is in many
On Thu, 2016-08-04 at 21:58 +0200, Rudolf Künzli wrote:
> The message was not clear.
> I have some people sending me messages I don't like.
> Naturally I could set up a filter and delete them automatically.
> But I like to let them know that their messages are not welcome
> More clear now?
It was
On Thu, 2016-08-04 at 20:05 +0100, Andrew Beverley wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Aug 2016 Andrew Beverley wrote:
> >
> > Yahoo and AOL are about the only major email providers that use
> > DMARC. It was quite controversial when they turned it on, especially
> > with no notice.
>
> Incidentally, Gmail have
On Thu, 2016-08-04 at 15:52 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-08-04 at 21:52 +0200, Rudolf Künzli wrote:
> > Hello,
> > Is there a way to bounce messages back to the sender?
> > I'd need that from time to time.
>
> Not entirely sure what you mean by "bounce", but you can Message
>
On Thu, 2016-08-04 at 21:52 +0200, Rudolf Künzli wrote:
> Hello,
> Is there a way to bounce messages back to the sender?
> I'd need that from time to time.
Not entirely sure what you mean by "bounce", but you can Message
->Forward As->Redirect.
--
Meetings Coordinator, Michigan Association of
Hello,
Is there a way to bounce messages back to the sender?
I'd need that from time to time.
Cheers
--
Rudolf Künzli - rudolf.kun...@gmail.com
Skype: rudolf.kunzli___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list options or
On Thu, 04 Aug 2016 Steve T wrote:
> It's my lack of understanding as to how all this works. I had simply
> assumed that when I sent a mail to the list, it just went to the list
> - and was 'from me'. Any mails then from the list back 'out' (ie to me
> and the other
On Thu, 2016-08-04 at 17:20 +0100, Andrew Beverley wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Aug 2016 Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > Correction, there are a couple of outliers (one from outlook.com)
> > but
> > I'm inclined to think those are genuine bounces, e.g. mailbox full
> > or
> > user unknown.
On Thu, 04 Aug 2016 Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> Correction, there are a couple of outliers (one from outlook.com) but
> I'm inclined to think those are genuine bounces, e.g. mailbox full or
> user unknown. Trouble is we don't have access to the actual bounce
> message so it's
On Thu, 2016-08-04 at 16:42 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-08-04 at 16:07 +0100, Steve T wrote:
> >
> > This has literally just happened again.
> > Given that it seems to be down to Yahoo's anti spam policy, I wasn't
> > sure if you wanted to know each time it occurred - let me
On Thu, 2016-08-04 at 16:07 +0100, Steve T wrote:
> This has literally just happened again.
> Given that it seems to be down to Yahoo's anti spam policy, I wasn't
> sure if you wanted to know each time it occurred - let me know.
>
> Regards
>
> Steve T
>
>
> Forwarded Message
This has literally just happened again.
Given that it seems to be down to Yahoo's anti spam policy, I wasn't
sure if you wanted to know each time it occurred - let me know.
Regards
Steve T
Forwarded Message
From: evolution-list-boun...@gnome.org
To: stevetuckn...@yahoo.co.uk
18 matches
Mail list logo