On Tue, 2017-06-13 at 07:41 +, NT KC wrote:
> So the "sudo rm /run/user/1???/dconf/user" sounds plausible, but had no
> effect No effect
>
> Next i deleted all dconf i could find in my homedir, and now all works.
Hi,
this wasn't the best thing to do, since by doing this you lost all
customi
Hello everyone,
I have a contact who regularly sends me calendar invites that he
generates using Evolution. I am unable to click on any of the interface
buttons that Evolution generates when rendering an email that has an
ICS attachment (Open Calendar, Decline, Tentative, Accept). The buttons
appe
> this wasn't the best thing to do, since by doing this you lost all
> customized settings for all applications using dconf. Next time for
> testing purpose move dconf files in home or directly just change the
> owner permissions.
>
> sudo chown $USER:$USER .config/dconf/user
> sudo chown $USER:$
On Thu, 15 Jun 2017 21:27:09 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
>1000-1999 range
I wrote about this already ;). In this case the context is important ;).
Deleting the tmpfs file doesn't cause issues, but indeed, on a set-up
that never ever is used by the OP, this range could cause issues. An
admin for a mul
On Thu, 15 Jun 2017 21:27:09 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
>Changing the ownership to $USER:$USER only works for those systems that
>generate a group for each user. It is not ubiquitous.
True, but it shouldn't cause an issue, if there shouldn't be a group
for each individual user.
The main pitfall sti
On Thu, 2017-06-15 at 22:40 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Jun 2017 21:27:09 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
> > 1000-1999 range
>
> I wrote about this already ;). In this case the context is important ;).
> Deleting the tmpfs file doesn't cause issues, but indeed, on a set-up
> that never ever
On Thu, 15 Jun 2017 23:06:22 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
>I think what I was trying to get across is that the answer you give is
>findable on the net
Ok, now I understand your concern. OTOH regular users on multi-user
systems shouldn't be allowed to get root privileges, this way the
owner and group o
Hi,
I have sufficient backup if it would backfire, but agreed the less
rigiouse solutions suggested are better/cleaner
Thnx
Den 2017-06-15 kl. 13:51, skrev Ralf Mardorf:
> On Tue, 2017-06-13 at 07:41 +, NT KC wrote:
>> So the "sudo rm /run/user/1???/dconf/user" sounds plausible, but had n
