[Evolution] No information about unread count next to folder names anymore?

2017-11-06 Thread Bjørn T Johansen
Not sure if this is because of updating to 3.26.2 or something else, but I no longer have unread count next to the folder names. Is there some setting to change this I haven't found or? Regards, BTJ -- -

Re: [Evolution] No information about unread count next to folder names anymore?

2017-11-06 Thread Andre Klapper
On Mon, 2017-11-06 at 09:10 +0100, Bjørn T Johansen wrote: > Not sure if this is because of updating to 3.26.2 or something else, > but I no longer have unread count next to the folder names. Is there > some setting to change this I haven't found or? I have. Which account types did you test this w

Re: [Evolution] No information about unread count next to folder names anymore?

2017-11-06 Thread Bjørn T Johansen
On Mon, 2017-11-06 at 10:04 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote: > On Mon, 2017-11-06 at 09:10 +0100, Bjørn T Johansen wrote: > > Not sure if this is because of updating to 3.26.2 or something else, > > but I no longer have unread count next to the folder names. Is there > > some setting to change this I ha

Re: [Evolution] Encrypting with GnuPG: `no imported public key` if key is not valid (not ultimate trusted)

2017-11-06 Thread Milan Crha
On Sat, 2017-11-04 at 14:25 +0100, Tim Rausch via evolution-list wrote: > it seems like something about the GPG signature went wrong. In order > to do this right, here's the message again, I hope, the signature > works this time. Hi, I do not know whether your system links /usr/bin/gpg to

Re: [Evolution] Offline calendar support

2017-11-06 Thread Milan Crha
On Sat, 2017-11-04 at 17:17 +0100, Tibor Attila Anca wrote: > So, I will go over Bugzilla. Hi, offline support of add/edit/delete had been added into the recent stable version, which is for 3.26.0 only. That was a pretty huge change [1], thus do not expect it in any previous version. I'll

Re: [Evolution] Mark for deletion?

2017-11-06 Thread Milan Crha
On Sat, 2017-11-04 at 12:32 -0700, Van Snyder wrote: > I can't find the configuration setting for that on > my other computers Hi, I suppose your account is IMAP. I've no idea what Evolution version you have. To not use real Trash folder, open the account Properties, move to the Defaults t

Re: [Evolution] Offline calendar support

2017-11-06 Thread Pete Biggs
On Mon, 2017-11-06 at 11:09 +0100, Milan Crha wrote: > On Sat, 2017-11-04 at 17:17 +0100, Tibor Attila Anca wrote: > > So, I will go over Bugzilla. > > Hi, > offline support of add/edit/delete had been added into the recent > stable version, which is for 3.26.0 only. That was a pretty huge >

Re: [Evolution] Offline calendar support

2017-11-06 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Mon, 2017-11-06 at 10:34 +, Pete Biggs wrote: > On Mon, 2017-11-06 at 11:09 +0100, Milan Crha wrote: > > On Sat, 2017-11-04 at 17:17 +0100, Tibor Attila Anca wrote: > > > So, I will go over Bugzilla. > > > > Hi, > > offline support of add/edit/delete had been added into the recent > > s

[Evolution] Fwd: [Bug 789912] Enable offline mode for calendar

2017-11-06 Thread Tibor Attila Anca
Hello, here is a follow up for my bug report concerning offline support for calendar/ task in evolution-data-server. Regards, Tibor Eredeti levél Feladó: evolution Küldve: Mon Nov 06 11:10:50 GMT+01:00 2017 Címzett: anca.ti...@posteo.de Tárgy: [Bug 789912] Enable offline mode

Re: [Evolution] Fwd: [Bug 789912] Enable offline mode for calendar

2017-11-06 Thread Milan Crha
On Mon, 2017-11-06 at 13:01 +0100, Tibor Attila Anca wrote: > Hello, here is a follow up for my bug report concerning offline > support for calendar/ task in evolution-data-server. Regards, Tibor Hi, you do not need to send bugzilla mails here (not talking about no threading with your orig

Re: [Evolution] Encrypting with GnuPG: `no imported public key` if key is not valid (not ultimate trusted)

2017-11-06 Thread Tim Rausch via evolution-list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hello, thank you for your relpy. I do not know whether your system links /usr/bin/gpg to /usr/bin/gpg2, Yes, it seems to do so: ➜ ~ ls -l /usr/bin/gpg2 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 3 Oct 27 07:43 /usr/bin/gpg2 -> gpg Is this normal that t

Re: [Evolution] Encrypting with GnuPG: `no imported public key` if key is not valid (not ultimate trusted)

2017-11-06 Thread Milan Crha
On Mon, 2017-11-06 at 15:01 +0100, Tim Rausch via evolution-list wrote: > Is this normal that the target isn't shown as a full path? Because > the "gpg" file is in the same folder as "gpg2"? Hi, I do not know, can be. > > There is a setting to change which gpg command should be used > >