On Mon, 2021-04-12 at 17:00 +0200, Milan Crha via evolution-list wrote:
>
> Evolution as:
>
> $ WEBKIT_DISABLE_COMPOSITING_MODE=1 flatpak run org.gnome.Evolution
>
> just make sure there is no evolution process running from the /app
> prefix (by running: ps ax | grep evolution), please? I do
On Mon, 2021-04-12 at 10:23 -0500, Matt Connell wrote:
> Is this the case even in plain-text view? That is to say, is the
> text version also rendered via webkit?
Hi,
yes, it does use WebKitGTK, both in the preview and in the editor,
regardless of the message content format.
For what
On Mon, 2021-04-12 at 10:23 -0500, Matt Connell wrote:
> Unrelated to the OP's question, and I have no issues to report, but
> this prompted a question.
>
> On Mon, 2021-04-12 at 17:00 +0200, Milan Crha via evolution-list wrote:
> > the preview panel is WebKitGTK. Evolution itself doesn't render
Unrelated to the OP's question, and I have no issues to report, but
this prompted a question.
On Mon, 2021-04-12 at 17:00 +0200, Milan Crha via evolution-list wrote:
> the preview panel is WebKitGTK. Evolution itself doesn't render
> anything there.
Is this the case even in plain-text view?
On Mon, 2021-04-12 at 09:40 -0500, Anonymous Japhering via evolution-
list wrote:
> recently did the update and started seeing that frequently the
> preview pane does not render until mouse is in the preview pane.
Hi,
the preview panel is WebKitGTK. Evolution itself doesn't render
Evolution 3.40.1 (flatpak git668023c)
System:
Kernel: 5.4.0-70-generic x86_64 bits: 64
Desktop: MATE 1.22.2
Distro: Linux Mint 19.3 Tricia
recently did the update and started seeing that frequently the preview pane does
not render until mouse is in the preview pane.
So if I'm
On Thu, 2021-04-08 at 00:09 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-04-07 at 22:29 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Wed, 2021-04-07 at 15:46 -0500, Anonymous Japhering via evolution-
> > list wrote:
> > > For years, I've paid attention to the popup from Evolution which give
> > > a
> > >
On Sat, 2021-04-10 at 11:18 +0200, Ralf Mardorf via evolution-list
wrote:
> IMO updates shouldn't override/overwrite existing
> views, at least an update should check, if a button already exists,
> instead of adding a duplicate.
Hi,
the update doesn't do any such thing. The .ui files are
