On Sat, 2022-10-15 at 22:55 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
> Personally, I wish I could turn off users doing Reply-all to mailing
> lists.
I'd vote for that. In fact it wouldn't appear to be hard to do. If
Evolution sees that the replied-to message has the appropriate list
headers, it could simply turn
Evolution 3.46.0 (flathub) on Zorin 15.3
How do i get the previous interface back? Can't find a setting that's
relevant.
I'm not talking about preferences for composinig mail.. i'm talking
about the interface ribbon at the top (titled mail, includes the
min/mac/close buttons) that is now arrows an
On Sun, 2022-10-16 at 19:34 +0300, Tim Ehrenhaft wrote:
> How do i get the previous interface back?
Hi,
I don't use a desktop environment, but just a plain window manager named
openbox. To get rid of gtk3 client side decoration on an up to date Arch
Linux rolling release, I'm using https://github
On Sun, 2022-10-16 at 19:34 +0300, Tim Ehrenhaft wrote:
> Evolution 3.46.0 (flathub) on Zorin 15.3
>
> How do i get the previous interface back?
You wait for 3.46.1 and upgrade once it's released:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/evolution/-/issues/2039
Cheers,
andre
--
Andre Klapper | ak...@gm
On Sun, 2022-10-16 at 19:14 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> However, it doesn't help with gtk4 applications. To use a gtk4
> application you need to be able to read, since icons for
> min/max/close are dropped and replaced by a right click menu with
> text only. There's no title at all anymore.
That
On Sun, 2022-10-16 at 19:34 +0300, Tim Ehrenhaft via evolution-list
wrote:
> Evolution 3.46.0 (flathub) on Zorin 15.3
>
> How do i get the previous interface back? Can't find a setting that's
> relevant.
> I'm not talking about preferences for composinig mail.. i'm talking
> about the interface ri
On Sun, 2022-10-16 at 19:38 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
> That's off-topic (as Evolution doesn't use GTK version 4).
Hi,
my point is, that nowadays https://github.com/ZaWertun/gtk3-nocsd does
help, but soon or later Evolution likely migrates to gtk4 and then
there's no workaround to get rid of i
On Fri, 2022-10-14 at 09:34 -0400, Jeff via evolution-list wrote:
> I wondered now if something about this could be relevant to the
> documentation page in the user manual, or if that's considered too
> niche?
Hi,
if you mean to write to the manual a note about a workaround, then I'd
rathe
On Sat, 2022-10-15 at 18:49 +0200, Francesco Porro via evolution-list
wrote:
> I don't know if it's worth to file a bug because that only happened
> with yahoo imap and mail filters I set up for my malinglist.
Hi,
reproducibility is crucial. Without it bugs like this one are not that
usefu
On Sun, 2022-10-16 at 13:05 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> If Evolution sees that the replied-to message has the appropriate
> list headers, it could simply turn Reply-To-All into Reply-To-List,
> or just disable Reply-To-All.
Hi,
there are still legitimate use-cases for Reply-To-All
10 matches
Mail list logo
