Re: [Evolution] Contact list anomaly

2013-01-31 Thread Bernhard Kleine
Am Mittwoch, den 30.01.2013, 23:40 -0500 schrieb Carpetnailz: I was able to find the contact by the email address search. When I opened it to edit, the full name was there as well, so I don't know why it didn't show up, even when I scrolled through the entire contact list. I saved the edit

[Evolution] Evo 3.2.3: Line wrapping in received mails

2013-01-07 Thread Bernhard Kleine
Hi, sometimes I get mails without line wrapping. I do not seem to be able to format these in the preview window. Is there any solution to wrapping mails automatically? Kind regards, Bernhard ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To

[Evolution] RSS-feed plugin in Ubuntu 12.04 LTS errorneous

2012-05-08 Thread Bernhard Kleine
Hi, I have a fresh install of Ubuntu 12.04 and added Evolution 3.2.3 from the Ubuntu sources. I also added the rss-feed plugin and that seems to be causing segfault. I experienced several crashes while opening feeds. After removing the plugin using the package management (synaptic) Evo runs

[Evolution] newsreader in evolution 3.2.2.

2012-03-27 Thread Bernhard Kleine
Hi everybody, I am running evolution 3.2.2 on ubuntu 11.10 oneiric, and I am reading some newsgroups using evolution. However, I have noticed that mail-filtering as well as some other functions like mark mails as read do not function properly for the newsgroups while working well on other

Re: [Evolution] newsreader in evolution 3.2.2.

2012-03-27 Thread Bernhard Kleine
Am Dienstag, den 27.03.2012, 11:19 +0200 schrieb Andre Klapper: Hi Bernhard, On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 09:27 +0200, Bernhard Kleine wrote: I am running evolution 3.2.2 on ubuntu 11.10 oneiric, and I am reading some newsgroups using evolution. However, I have noticed that mail-filtering

[Evolution] Mail rules not for nntp folders?

2012-02-01 Thread Bernhard Kleine
Hi, I have a lot of mail filters for different purposes. They appear, however, not to work in usenet folders. Is this a known bug? E.g. I have killfiled a couple of persons from an ubuntu forum. Still, any new mail from these supposingly removed persons appears. It can, however, be removed with

Re: [Evolution] How to handle unsolicited e-mails with evolution 2.32.2 ?

2011-11-27 Thread Bernhard Kleine
Am Sonntag, den 27.11.2011, 13:30 +0100 schrieb Thomas Prost: If the server has been setup to do spam detection, why on earth did you disable it? ... because I want to control here by myself, what is spam and what not ;-) This is hybris: As a single person, you cannot judge what spam is

Re: [Evolution] Evolution 3.0.3 -- when?

2011-08-21 Thread Bernhard Kleine
Am Freitag, den 19.08.2011, 10:31 -0700 schrieb Jonathan Ryshpan: I've been running the Evolution mail system under Fedora-15/KDE for about 6 weeks now, and it has some very serious problems, which I can summarize as: 1. It ignores font control from the KDE Settings-Applications

[Evolution] segmentation fault after sending a message

2011-08-19 Thread Bernhard Kleine
Hi, since yesterday (?), i get segmentation faults when I send a message: The message itself is sent, however, but during saving evolution 3.0.2 crashes. The packages updated donot look to involve eolution which was not updated: Commit Log for Fri Aug 19 04:33:58 2011 Die folgenden Pakete

[Evolution] Error message Message could not be saved in Sent

2011-08-16 Thread Bernhard Kleine
Hi, Using evo 3.0.2 I have finally managed to have the nntp protocol working. To send mail I use my normal provider. Whenever I sent a news I get a warning in evo telling me that the sent mail could not be saved to the Sent folder, but the folder verschickt (german for sent) was used instead.

Re: [Evolution] Error message Message could not be saved in Sent

2011-08-16 Thread Bernhard Kleine
Am Dienstag, den 16.08.2011, 16:23 +0100 schrieb Constantin Orăsan: Hello, Using evo 3.0.2 I have finally managed to have the nntp protocol working. To send mail I use my normal provider. Whenever I sent a news I get a warning in evo telling me that the sent mail could not be saved to

Re: [Evolution] holiday calendar germany?

2011-08-10 Thread Bernhard Kleine
Am Dienstag, den 09.08.2011, 20:11 +0100 schrieb Pete Biggs: Since the actual entries now have the wrong info in them, I suspect the only way you can deal with it is to manually alter everything. Well, that does not seem the best alternative. Is there a possibility to

Re: [Evolution] [solved] holiday calendar germany?

2011-08-10 Thread Bernhard Kleine
Am Mittwoch, den 10.08.2011, 10:53 +0200 schrieb Bernhard Kleine: Am Dienstag, den 09.08.2011, 20:11 +0100 schrieb Pete Biggs: Since the actual entries now have the wrong info in them, I suspect the only way you can deal with it is to manually alter everything. Well

Re: [Evolution] calendar one day to early

2011-08-09 Thread Bernhard Kleine
Hi Pete, Am Dienstag, den 09.08.2011, 09:34 +0100 schrieb Pete Biggs: The calendar is local. I do not remember to have included any other calendar. These are informations in the personal calendar. Your question: timezone berlin/stockholm/rome i.e. germany central european summer time;

[Evolution] calendar one day to early

2011-08-08 Thread Bernhard Kleine
Hi, since quite some time I have holiday entries in my calendar which are just one day to early. When I change these entries e.g. eastern sunday 2012 is not on a sunday 8-April-12 but on saturday 7-april12. I can change this entry, sure, but then in the next year the same problem. I do not have

Re: [Evolution] calendar one day to early

2011-08-08 Thread Bernhard Kleine
Am Montag, den 08.08.2011, 10:02 -0430 schrieb Patrick O'Callaghan: On 8 August 2011 08:49, Bernhard Kleine bernhard.kle...@gmx.net wrote: Hi, since quite some time I have holiday entries in my calendar which are just one day to early. When I change

Re: [Evolution] Sync'ing desktop laptop Evolution

2011-04-07 Thread Bernhard Kleine
Am Dienstag, den 05.04.2011, 15:14 +0100 schrieb Maurice Batey: Apology: When earlier I said 'sync', i really meant 'clone', not dynamic syncing between systems. On Mon, 04 Apr 2011 13:13:22 +0100, I wrote: Can this be done simply by copying ~/.evolution from one to the

Re: [Evolution] evolution always starts offline

2009-11-08 Thread Bernhard Kleine
hi felix, we had a similar thread some days ago. At the origin of the problem is network manager who does not touch static IP adresses. As a consequence Evo sees that there is no actual network controlled by Network Manager and thus assumes that there isnot any network at all. This behaviour

Re: [Evolution] evolution 2.28 starts automatically in off-line mode! howto change that?

2009-10-20 Thread Bernhard Kleine
Am Montag, den 19.10.2009, 18:37 -0430 schrieb Patrick O'Callaghan: On Mon, 2009-10-19 at 19:50 +0200, Bernhard Kleine wrote: You are correct. NM is running and does not show the e100 eth0 interface. Thanks for pointing me into the correct direction! Glad it worked. Just note that you

Re: [Evolution] viewing emails

2008-11-15 Thread Bernhard Kleine
it back to the way it was? Thank you, Maybe you need Ctrl-M ;-) Bernhard Martha ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list -- Bernhard Kleine Lenzkirch (Black Forest

Re: [Evolution] Backing up

2008-11-09 Thread Bernhard Kleine
Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list -- Bernhard Kleine Lenzkirch (Black Forest) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Author von Hormone und Hormonsystem http://www.springer.com/life+sci/biochemistry/book/978-3-540-37702-3 signature.asc Description: Dies ist ein digital

[Evolution] no signature verification from evo by gnome-gpg

2008-09-09 Thread Bernhard Kleine
the mail and the signature is labelled as ungültig (unvalid). Can I get confirmation for this? Even my own signed mails are never correctly verified. I am using debian sid, latest versions on the official mirrors, no private intervention. Bernhard -- Bernhard Kleine [EMAIL PROTECTED

[Evolution] no signature verification from evo by gnome-gpg

2008-09-08 Thread Bernhard Kleine
the mail and the signature is labelled as ungültig (unvalid). Can I get confirmation for this? Even my own signed mails are never correctly verified. I am using debian sid, latest versions on the official mirrors, no private intervention. Bernhard -- Bernhard Kleine [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [Evolution] signatures not verifiable

2006-06-05 Thread Bernhard Kleine
, 2006-05-26 at 17:46 +0200, Bernhard Kleine wrote: Hallo, gpg/pgp signatures are not verified. Since certificates are and the seahorse daemon is running, this error lies in evo. I tried to file a bug-report against evolution 2.6, however, bug-buddy did not accept error reports for evolution

Re: [Evolution] signatures not verifiable

2006-06-05 Thread Bernhard Kleine
, 2006-05-26 at 17:46 +0200, Bernhard Kleine wrote: Hallo, gpg/pgp signatures are not verified. Since certificates are and the seahorse daemon is running, this error lies in evo. I tried to file a bug-report against evolution 2.6, however, bug-buddy did not accept error reports for evolution

Re: [Evolution] signatures not verifiable

2006-06-05 Thread Bernhard Kleine
Am Fri, 02 Jun 2006 09:24:01 -0400 schrieb Jeffrey Stedfast: Evolution doesn't use seahorse or care anything about it anyways, verifying pgp/gpg signatures works fine for me in Evo, so not sure what the problem could be... also, the key id is for signing, not verifying. Jeff Hallo,

[Evolution] signatures not verifiable

2006-06-01 Thread Bernhard Kleine
-1 debian unstable freshly updated Bernhard -- Bernhard Kleine mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] linux-user Nr. 411598 PGP-Key PGP-Fingerprint: 0x6C1D9C2A 3161 A9E2 B661 A242 D9AF 61BF C842 4D18 6C1D 9C2A

[Evolution] evolution problems

2006-06-01 Thread Bernhard Kleine
using PAN) Betreff: signatures not verifiable Von: Bernhard Kleine [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 Datum: Fri, 26 May 2006 17:46:09 +0200 X-Evolution-PostTo: nntp://@news.gmane.org

[Evolution] signatures not verifiable

2006-06-01 Thread Bernhard Kleine
-1 debian unstable freshly updated Bernhard -- Bernhard Kleine (linux-user Nr. 411598) PGP-Key PGP-Fingerprint: 0x6C1D9C2A 3161 A9E2 B661 A242 D9AF 61BF C842 4D18 6C1D 9C2A