Re: [Evolution] Security implications of WebKit migration

2012-09-20 Thread Dan Vratil
On Thursday 20 of September 2012 11:56:01 Jose Dapena Paz wrote: > El jue, 20-09-2012 a las 11:39 +0200, Dan Vratil escribió: > > The only unfortunate thing we haven't "fixed" yet are plugins. We have to > > have plugins enabled in order to be able to inject GtkWi

Re: [Evolution] Security implications of WebKit migration

2012-09-20 Thread Dan Vratil
On Wednesday 22 of August 2012 08:27:05 Paul Menzel wrote: > Dear Evolution folks, > Hi, sorry for not replying earlier, I didn't notice your question before. > > finding two bug reports in the Debian BTS about not-existing security > support for WebKit releases, I am wondering if the WebKit mig

Re: [Evolution] Purpose of `~/.local/share/evolution/addressbook/system/log.0000000001`?

2012-09-19 Thread Dan Vratil
On Wednesday 19 of September 2012 09:58:44 Paul Menzel wrote: > Dear Evolution folks, > Hello, > > could you please point me to some resource describing or tell me the > purpose of `~/.local/share/evolution/addressbook/system/log.01` > is? It's created by the Berkeley database which we

Re: [Evolution] Sending photos from digKam: "Skipping suspicious attachment"

2012-06-25 Thread Dan Vratil
On Saturday 23 of June 2012 16:44:45 Matthew Barnes wrote: > On Sat, 2012-06-23 at 21:10 +0200, Jacob Nielsen wrote: > > Fair enough. But I get no indication at all in the GUI that the > > attachments were skipped. > > You will in 3.4. It was considered a security issue that came up during > 3.3

Re: [Evolution] Avoiding automatic marking as read

2012-05-31 Thread Dan Vratil
On Thursday 31 of May 2012 09:41:11 Milan Crha wrote: > On Wed, 2012-05-30 at 23:05 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > On Wed, 2012-05-30 at 22:13 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: > > > On Wed, 2012-05-30 at 21:28 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > > OK, thanks. Is there some rationale for remo

Re: [Evolution] Airplay for 8 Evo enhancement requests

2012-04-27 Thread Dan Vratil
On Friday 27 of April 2012 14:47:09 Nick Jenkins wrote: > Hi all, > > Now that the Evo 3.6 development period seems to be underway, I'm going > to post a short list of the Evo enhancement requests in bugzilla that > stand out for me the most. > > There's roughly 73 open and 105 resolved bugs - a

Re: [Evolution] How to copy/cut from the body of an email

2012-04-23 Thread Dan Vratil
On Monday 23 of April 2012 09:38:23 Andre Klapper wrote: > On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 08:25 +0100, Graham Murray wrote: > > Using Evolution 3.2.3 under gnome on Linux. Is there any way of > > copying > > arbitrary text from the body of a received email. When I try to use > > the > > normal X mechanism o

Re: [Evolution] Wingdings J

2012-03-20 Thread Dan Vratil
On Friday 16 of March 2012 16:09:56 Matthias Apitz wrote: > Hello, > > From time to time I see in my Evo 2.32.3 a mail coming from an OutLook > user and having a single letter > > J > > as, for example, part of the text or the signature; I was curious enough > to ask the sender what he typed

Re: [Evolution] How do you want printed emails to look like?

2011-10-27 Thread Dan Vratil
On Thursday 27 of October 2011 12:01:44 Kåre Fiedler Christiansen wrote: > On Wed, 2011-10-26 at 19:14 +0200, Dan Vratil wrote: > > > > > But I'd like to hear from all of you what do you think about the > > proposed > > look, what would you change or ke

Re: [Evolution] How do you want printed emails to look like?

2011-10-27 Thread Dan Vratil
On Thursday 27 of October 2011 11:09:33 Nick Jenkins wrote: > > But I'd like to hear from all of you what do you think about the > > proposed > > look, what would you change or keep, or remove... I have printed the > > email in various mail clients so that you can compare it and find some > > inspi

Re: [Evolution] How do you want printed emails to look like?

2011-10-27 Thread Dan Vratil
On Thursday 27 of October 2011 08:44:30 Pete Biggs wrote: > > [cut] > > All I was really thinking about was being able to have a choice of, say, > 3 or 4 different layouts of the email printout that the user can choose > from - ranging from a compact utilitarian format to a more presentable > form

Re: [Evolution] How do you want printed emails to look like?

2011-10-26 Thread Dan Vratil
On Wednesday 26 of October 2011 19:01:14 Pete Biggs wrote: > > But I'd like to hear from all of you what do you think about the > > proposed > > look, what would you change or keep, or remove... I have printed the > > email in various mail clients so that you can compare it and find some > > inspir

[Evolution] How do you want printed emails to look like?

2011-10-26 Thread Dan Vratil
Hi everyone, I begun porting the email printing to WebKit. Since I can take advantage of CSS and very good printing support in WebKit, I decided to look on how the printed emails should look like. But I'd like to hear from all of you what do you think about the proposed look, what would you ch

Re: [Evolution] evolution 3.1.4 HTML rendering engine?

2011-08-05 Thread Dan Vratil
On 08/05/2011 10:25 AM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote: Hi all, I installed (Ubuntu Oneiric's) Evolution 3.1.4 and wonder what is the HTML rendering engine: - Webkit? - Gecko? - Another? Greping the installed packages, I dont find any 'moz*' (I fired them all), the remaining is Webkit (I use Epi

Re: [Evolution] Search folders and new messages

2011-07-22 Thread Dan Vratil
On Fri, 2011-07-22 at 13:57 +0200, Fred J wrote: > ... TB also tends to render HTML mail a > lot more accurately. WebKit renderer is (slowly) comming! :) - Dan ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or un

Re: [Evolution] RFE: how about a "expand current thread" command?

2011-06-15 Thread Dan Vratil
On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 08:21 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > In large folders -- such as the one where I keep the traffic for this > list -- I usually restrict the message list to Unread. However I often > find myself looking at a reply to some thread and want to see the > context. The only opti