Re: [Evolution] Evolution 3.12 still doesn't like my VPNs

Le vendredi 18 juillet 2014 à 08:03 -0500, Christian Dysthe a écrit : > I was informed that Evolution 3.12 would be better at working with > frequent connection changes, in my case switching between VPN > connections. I do this many times a day and all connected applications > I always have open (

[Evolution] Which folders are safe to delete (namely in ~/.local/share/evolution/) ?

Hi there, I'm currently using Evolution 3.12. I think Evolution has accumulated a fair amount of cruft in my user folders over the past ten years or so. I would like to "freshen" it now that we've gone through the major changes like the maildir migration etc. Please take a look at the attached sc

Re: [Evolution] Mail notifications

Hi Peter, It's easier than that. Go into GNOME Control Center and into the "Notifications" prefs pane. You will be able to disable notifications per-application. ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or uns

Re: [Evolution] Evolution stopped showing reminders before start of appointment.

I'd like to chime in: it has been my experience that appointment reminders have been FUBAR for quite a long time. Has it been one year, two years, more? I'm not sure. The logic that governs whether they show up or not, and whether they show up at the correct time or not, eludes me; the result is th

[Evolution] What is the Evolution upgrade path like if skipping releases?

Hi all, Looking at an aunt's computer yesterday night, I realized she's still using Evolution 3.2. The reason is simple: the Fedora 16 release I set up on her computer two years ago still works perfectly fine, even though it's not an enterprise/LTS edition. If it ain't broke, don't fix it etc. I

Re: [Evolution] .cache/evolution/mail any cleanup logic?

Le vendredi 12 avril 2013 à 14:47 -0400, Matthew Barnes a écrit : > On Fri, 2013-04-12 at 20:08 +0200, Thomas Prost wrote: > > Sorry, bad description of my attempt: I'd delete all the directories > > in ./cache/evolution not looking at files at all ... > > Anything bad will come over me ? > [...]

Re: [Evolution] SSL certificates and Man in the Middle attacks

Right then, if you are all saying that my premise ("perhaps some CAs deliver certificates for domains that are not actually demonstrably owned by the requester") is utterly wrong, and that the myriad of CAs we provide by default are all trustworthy, then the system is, I guess, trustworthy. Just w

[Evolution] SSL certificates and Man in the Middle attacks

Hi there, As far as I can tell, Evolution uses a default set of SSL certificate authorities. However, I've been told that the Certificate Authorities system is fundamentally flawed, in the sense that CAs don't communicate with each other, any of them can sign for any domain name, and I've been tol