Re: [Evolution] Lost connection to back-end Exchange process

2008-07-02 Thread Peter Saffrey
On Tue, 2008-07-01 at 18:02 +0100, Ian Redfern wrote: In particular, I recommend upgrading your libldap-2.4-2 to 2.4.9-0ubuntu0.8.04 from hardy-updates - it solved pretty much all of my problems. Thanks for your reply. I usually update packages every day, so these should be the most current

Re: [Evolution] Lost connection to back-end Exchange process

2008-06-30 Thread Peter Saffrey
My apologies. I'm running Ubuntu 8.04/Evo 2.22.2 on both machines I mentioned. Peter ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list

Re: [Evolution] Lost connection to back-end Exchange process

2008-06-29 Thread Peter Saffrey
On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 09:25 -0400, Art Alexion wrote: This was a problem with some versions. I have not had the problem on SLED 10.1/Evo 2.6 nor Ubuntu 8.04/Evo 2.22.2. My apologies. I'm running Ubuntu 8.04/Evo 2.22.2 on both machines I mentioned. Peter

[Evolution] Lost connection to back-end Exchange process

2008-06-26 Thread Peter Saffrey
I use Evolution to connect to my work Exchange server, both from a home machine and a work machine. I get the above error message quite frequently, about 10 times a day at home and 2 or 3 from work. It means that I can't receive new messages or read those that I haven't already selected during a

[Evolution] gnome-keyring and Evolution take all my CPU

2008-06-15 Thread Peter Saffrey
My Evolution installation (2.22.2 on Ubuntu 8.04) regularly grabs most of the processor, split between gnome-keyring-daemon (40%), evolution (25%) and evolution-exchange (15%). This usually happens after I start writing a message (like this one). Performance doesn't seem to suffer too much, but

[Evolution] Junk button

2008-05-14 Thread Peter Saffrey
I started this thread here: http://mail.gnome.org/archives/evolution-list/2008-April/msg00110.html I now need to revisit it after I found half a dozen very important work messages in my inbox using the outlook web client that I had never seen using Evolution. I can only assume that Evolution had

[Evolution] The junk button

2008-04-21 Thread Peter Saffrey
Where can I adjust the behaviour of the junk button? At the moment, what happens when I press this button is that it uses the message to update its filters and then the message disappears. However, when I go to a different mailer (for example, a different machine) connected to the same account,

Re: [Evolution] Slow response

2007-09-06 Thread Peter Saffrey
On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 02:29 -0400, Paul Smith wrote: Unfortunately, your mail client encapsulated the screenshot in ms-tnef (Microsoft Transport Neutral Encapsulation Format) which is a proprietary Microsoft encapsulation format that I don't have a decoder for on my Linux system. So, I can't

Re: [Evolution] Slow response

2007-09-06 Thread Peter Saffrey
OK, that last problem has been fixed and Evolution now starts properly. I have no idea why that library was not present as it should be, but now it is. However, Evo still isn't quite working for me. This time, it's the Exchange configuration. At the receiving messages stage, I do not get all

Re: [Evolution] Slow response

2007-09-06 Thread Peter Saffrey
Wow, that seems slow to me but I have a decent internet connection. One thing to note is that Evo does a lot of client-side caching in your ~/.evolution directory, which means the first time a folder is visited after you've created an account, it will be pretty slow. Subsequent visits

Re: [Evolution] Slow response

2007-08-29 Thread Peter Saffrey
(Let me know if you'd prefer to take this conversation off-list) Sorry, it was foolish of me to use the old Makefile when you'd sent an update. The new one you sent compiled everything without errors. However, I am still without a working Evo. It starts up fine, but I get an interface with

Re: [Evolution] Slow response

2007-08-28 Thread Peter Saffrey
Hi there, First of all, I apologise for the negative comments in my previous post - Paul was absolutely right about them being unhelpful. Evolution is an impressive tool, and it is hardly fair to blame it for struggling to have perfect interaction with a proprietary mail service, especially one

Re: [Evolution] Slow response

2007-08-24 Thread Peter Saffrey
On Fri, 2007-08-24 at 01:25 -0400, Paul Smith wrote: What version of Ubuntu are you using? Saying you're using Evo 2 doesn't tell us much: Evo 2.0 was released years ago. The current stable version, provided in Ubuntu 7.04 (Feisty Fawn) is Evo 2.10. That's the one I'm using. Or, you can

[Evolution] Slow response

2007-08-23 Thread Peter Saffrey
I've just moved back to Ubuntu after a year working in Windows. I've been managing my mail, which resides on a MS Exchange server, using Outlook and Outlook Web Access. Now I'm back on Linux, I decided I would try using Evolution, since it seems to be the Ubuntu default. I entered the details