> Brewster Gillett wrote:
> > It would seem this may be a bug. Either that or there's an option
> > switch > I have not yet found that acts to override clear and simple
> > instructions > from the Contacts Editor.
> Hi,
Milan Crha:
> I agree, sounds like a bug. I've no idea whether it was
On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 03:41 -0800, Brewster Gillett wrote:
> It would seem this may be a bug. Either that or there's an option
> switch
> I have not yet found that acts to override clear and simple
> instructions
> from the Contacts Editor. But that still does not explain how it is
> that
> several
> On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 13:37 -0800, Brewster Gillett wrote:
> > But it is refusing to sort as I have asked - something the
> > old Evo never had a problem with. If I look at my individual
> > Contacts, the sort rules are exactly as I have set them up -
> > usually last name first for individuals
On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 13:37 -0800, Brewster Gillett wrote:
> But it is refusing to sort as I have asked - something the
> old Evo never had a problem with. If I look at my individual
> Contacts, the sort rules are exactly as I have set them up -
> usually last name first for individuals, which nat
Yet another issue crops up in my freshly installed 2.28.1 -
(under Karmic Koala on an AMD Athlon 2.something)
I can live with the system having somehow left behind
several of the Contacts from my old 1.7 or 1.4 or whatever
ancient Evo it was. I can always re-enter a handful.
And have already done
