Re: [Evolution] Evolution Flatpak build

2020-09-30 Thread Milan Crha via evolution-list
On Tue, 2020-09-29 at 17:25 +0200, Milan Crha via evolution-list wrote: > I'm still lost why you cannot download the libcanberra sources. > That's the error you get about, right? Maybe you've "https > everywhere" enabled somehow somewhere. The site has only http://, > not https:// (otherwise I'd

Re: [Evolution] Evolution Flatpak build

2020-09-29 Thread Milan Crha via evolution-list
On Tue, 2020-09-29 at 10:06 -0500, Japhering, Anonymous via evolution- list wrote: > > "runtime": "org.gnome.Platform", > > -   "runtime-version": "3.38", > > +   "runtime-version": "3.36", > > "sdk": "org.gnome.Sdk", > > > > > Yes, changed all 3 appearances of 3.38 to

Re: [Evolution] Evolution Flatpak build

2020-09-29 Thread Japhering, Anonymous via evolution-list
On Tue, 2020-09-29 at 09:23 +0200, Milan Crha via evolution-list wrote: > On Sat, 2020-09-26 at 19:14 -0500, Japhering, Anonymous via > evolution- > list wrote: > > > I suggest to use the 3.36 version, instead of the 3.38 version > > > (and > > > remove the libcanberra from the Flatapk manifest

Re: [Evolution] Evolution Flatpak build

2020-09-29 Thread Milan Crha via evolution-list
On Sat, 2020-09-26 at 19:14 -0500, Japhering, Anonymous via evolution- list wrote: > > I suggest to use the 3.36 version, instead of the 3.38 version (and > > remove the libcanberra from the Flatapk manifest (.json file)). > > So removing the stanza for libcanberra from the .json file results in

Re: [Evolution] Evolution Flatpak build

2020-09-27 Thread Andre Klapper
On Sat, 2020-09-26 at 19:14 -0500, Japhering, Anonymous via evolution- list wrote: >-- Checking for module 'libcanberra-gtk3>=0.25' >-- Package 'libcanberra-gtk3', required by 'virtual:world', not >found >CMake Error at cmake/modules/PkgConfigEx.cmake:32 (message): >

Re: [Evolution] Evolution Flatpak build

2020-09-26 Thread Japhering, Anonymous via evolution-list
On Mon, 2020-09-21 at 08:25 +0200, Milan Crha via evolution-list wrote: > On Fri, 2020-09-18 at 09:05 -0500, Japhering, Anonymous via > evolution- > list wrote: > > So, I have git 2.17.1 installed vs the current 2.28.0, is that my > > issue or is it something else? > > > > Do I need to manually

Re: [Evolution] Evolution Flatpak build

2020-09-21 Thread Milan Crha via evolution-list
On Fri, 2020-09-18 at 09:05 -0500, Japhering, Anonymous via evolution- list wrote: > So, I have git 2.17.1 installed vs the current 2.28.0, is that my > issue or is it something else? > > Do I need to manually clone the repo first ? Hi, no idea, I'm sorry. I've been able to successfully

Re: [Evolution] Evolution Flatpak build

2020-09-18 Thread Japhering, Anonymous via evolution-list
On Fri, 2020-09-18 at 10:47 +0200, Milan Crha via evolution-list wrote: > On Fri, 2020-09-18 at 08:52 +0200, Milan Crha via evolution-list > wrote: > > It looks like they dropped libcanberra-gtk3 from the SDK for some > > reason. > > Hi, > so it's it, the GNOME Flatpak SDK dropped

Re: [Evolution] Evolution Flatpak build

2020-09-18 Thread Milan Crha via evolution-list
On Fri, 2020-09-18 at 08:52 +0200, Milan Crha via evolution-list wrote: > It looks like they dropped libcanberra-gtk3 from the SDK for some > reason. Hi, so it's it, the GNOME Flatpak SDK dropped libcanberra from itself. I just committed a change to the Evolution Flatpak manifests, which

Re: [Evolution] Evolution Flatpak build

2020-09-18 Thread Milan Crha via evolution-list
On Thu, 2020-09-17 at 16:11 -0500, Japhering, Anonymous via evolution- list wrote: > Yet I have both the production and dev versions of 0.30,  which as > you > can see is not being seen. Hi, you are building Flatpak, it doesn't read development files from the host system. It looks like

Re: [Evolution] Evolution Flatpak build

2020-09-17 Thread Japhering, Anonymous via evolution-list
On Wed, 2020-09-16 at 18:39 +0200, Milan Crha via evolution-list wrote: > On Wed, 2020-09-16 at 15:48 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote: > > > Nothing, if I understand it correctly. Just unfortunate timing. > > Correct. I blindly bumped all 3.36/3-36 to 3.38/3-38, including the > runtime version, not

Re: [Evolution] Evolution Flatpak build

2020-09-16 Thread Japhering, Anonymous via evolution-list
On Wed, 2020-09-16 at 18:39 +0200, Milan Crha via evolution-list wrote: > Mike, you can safely edit the downloaded .json file and change > the'runtime-version' from 3.38 to 3.36. It will work too. Not a big issue, I just try to rebuild the flatpak version every time I get a kernel update.

Re: [Evolution] Evolution Flatpak build

2020-09-16 Thread Milan Crha via evolution-list
On Wed, 2020-09-16 at 15:48 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote: > Maybe that page should replace all and any version numbers with X.XX > and say "Replace X.XX with the GNOME version number." because I'm > getting tired of having to regularly bump versions... Hi, in fact, it is there: Note the

Re: [Evolution] Evolution Flatpak build

2020-09-16 Thread Japhering, Anonymous via evolution-list
On Wed, 2020-09-16 at 15:48 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote: > On Wed, 2020-09-16 at 08:28 -0500, Japhering, Anonymous wrote: > > > > flatpak --user install flathub org.gnome.Platform//3.38 org.gnome.Sdk//3.38 > > Looking for matches… > > error: Nothing matches org.gnome.Platform in remote flathub >

Re: [Evolution] Evolution Flatpak build

2020-09-16 Thread Andre Klapper
On Wed, 2020-09-16 at 08:28 -0500, Japhering, Anonymous wrote: > Evolutin 3.36.6 (flatpak gitf74a735) > > Using this page as the guide for building: > https://wiki.gnome.org/Apps/Evolution/Flatpak > > It says do > flatpak --user install flathub org.gnome.Platform//3.36 org.gnome.Sdk//3.36 > >

[Evolution] Evolution Flatpak build

2020-09-16 Thread Japhering, Anonymous via evolution-list
Evolutin 3.36.6 (flatpak gitf74a735) DISTRIB_ID=LinuxMint DISTRIB_RELEASE=19.3 DISTRIB_CODENAME=tricia DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Linux Mint 19.3 Tricia" NAME="Linux Mint" VERSION="19.3 (Tricia)" ID=linuxmint ID_LIKE=ubuntu PRETTY_NAME="Linux Mint 19.3" VERSION_ID="19.3" DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu