Hi,
I have read many posts regarding the IMAP namespace and evolution, but
none of them seem to solve the problem.
I have evolution 2.22.3.1 connecting to a courier with maildir and I
want that the inbox is in the same level as the subfolders.
Courier is reporting:
* LIST (\HasNoChildren) "." "
On Tue, 2010-01-19 at 14:17 +0100, Volker Jordan wrote:
> I have read many posts regarding the IMAP namespace and evolution, but
> none of them seem to solve the problem.
> I have evolution 2.22.3.1 connecting to a courier with maildir and I
> want that the inbox is in the same level as the subfold
Am Dienstag, den 19.01.2010, 08:24 -0500 schrieb Adam Tauno Williams:
> > Courier is reporting:
> > * LIST (\HasNoChildren) "." "INBOX.test"
> > * LIST (\HasNoChildren) "." "INBOX.test2"
> > But in evolution shows test and test2 as subfoders.
> > Any hint ?
>
> In "Receiving Options" is "Override
On Tue, 2010-01-19 at 14:17 +0100, Volker Jordan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have read many posts regarding the IMAP namespace and evolution, but
> none of them seem to solve the problem.
That's because it's not a namespace problem, see below.
> I have evolution 2.22.3.1 connecting to a courier with mail
Am Dienstag, den 19.01.2010, 11:52 -0430 schrieb Patrick O'Callaghan:
>
> > I have evolution 2.22.3.1 connecting to a courier with maildir and I
> > want that the inbox is in the same level as the subfolders.
>
> You can't change that from Evolution as it depends on the way Courier is
> configure
Am Dienstag, den 19.01.2010, 17:44 +0100 schrieb Volker Jordan:
> Am Dienstag, den 19.01.2010, 11:52 -0430 schrieb Patrick O'Callaghan:
> >
> > > I have evolution 2.22.3.1 connecting to a courier with maildir and I
> > > want that the inbox is in the same level as the subfolders.
> >
> > You can'
Am Dienstag, den 19.01.2010, 18:31 +0100 schrieb Thomas Mittelstaedt:
> Am Dienstag, den 19.01.2010, 17:44 +0100 schrieb Volker Jordan:
> > Am Dienstag, den 19.01.2010, 11:52 -0430 schrieb Patrick O'Callaghan:
> > >
> > > > I have evolution 2.22.3.1 connecting to a courier with maildir and I
...
>
On Tue, 2010-01-19 at 17:44 +0100, Volker Jordan wrote:
> What is this Override server-supplied folder namespace
> option for ?
Frankly, I have no idea and I can't find any documentation for it in
Evo. However the IMAP RFC
(http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc3501.html#ixzz0d5XU1BxS) says:
For ex
I just moved over to Fedora 20 from Ubuntu and haven't used Evolution
all too much in the past.
I need to set an IMAP Path or namespace on my IMAP account. A quick
Google shows tons of refereneces to an option titled to the effect of
"Overwrite default namespace" in Receiving Options, however tha
On Wed, 2014-11-19 at 08:16 -0600, Sajan Parikh wrote:
> I just moved over to Fedora 20 from Ubuntu and haven't used Evolution
> all too much in the past.
>
> I need to set an IMAP Path or namespace on my IMAP account. A quick
> Google shows tons of refereneces to an option titled to the effect o
On Wed, 2014-11-19 at 16:56 +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> I don't recall ever seeing that in Evolution. The namespace is normally
> defined at the server end. Why do you want to override it?
>
> poc
My Sent, Junk, Trash folders are all being shown as a subfolder of
Inbox. In Thunderbird, I
On Wed, 2014-11-19 at 11:09 -0600, Sajan Parikh wrote:
> My Sent, Junk, Trash folders are all being shown as a subfolder of
> Inbox. In Thunderbird, I was able to set a IMAP Path prefix to INBOX
> and everything became a top level folder as expected.
I guess that the old "IMAP" implementation off
On 19 November 2014 12:36, Andre Klapper wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-11-19 at 11:09 -0600, Sajan Parikh wrote:
> > My Sent, Junk, Trash folders are all being shown as a subfolder of
> > Inbox. In Thunderbird, I was able to set a IMAP Path prefix to INBOX
> > and everything became a top level folder as
Sajan Parikh wrote:
> My Sent, Junk, Trash folders are all being shown as a subfolder of
> Inbox. In Thunderbird, I was able to set a IMAP Path prefix to INBOX
> and everything became a top level folder as expected.
The server should be returning that the prefix is INBOX, without
requiring the cl
On Wed, 2014-11-19 at 11:09 -0600, Sajan Parikh wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-11-19 at 16:56 +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > I don't recall ever seeing that in Evolution. The namespace is normally
> > defined at the server end. Why do you want to override it?
> >
> > poc
>
> My Sent, Junk, Trash fo
On Wed, 2014-11-19 at 21:47 +0100, Ángel González wrote:
> > My Sent, Junk, Trash folders are all being shown as a subfolder of
> > Inbox. In Thunderbird, I was able to set a IMAP Path prefix to
> INBOX
> > and everything became a top level folder as expected.
>
> The server should be returning t
On Wed, 2014-11-19 at 08:16 -0600, Sajan Parikh wrote:
> I need to set an IMAP Path or namespace on my IMAP account. A quick
> Google shows tons of refereneces to an option titled to the effect
> of "Overwrite default namespace" in Receiving Options, however that
> option does not exist for me.
On Thu, 2014-11-20 at 08:37 +0100, Milan Crha wrote:
> Hi,
> the IMAPx has the option, but it was removed from preferences. There
> is also a bug report to return in back, but I cannot find it right
> now. The current only way is to go to ~/.config/evolution/sources and
> pick the right
Thanks,
Tim McConnell
> Message: 4
> Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 18:30:59 +0100
> From: Thomas Mittelstaedt
> To: Volker Jordan
> Cc: evolution-list@gnome.org
> Subject: Re: [Evolution] IMAP namespace
> Message-ID: <1263922259.7826.27.ca...@linux1>
> Content-Type:
19 matches
Mail list logo
