hi,
There is a function I would like to be ported on the vanilla Ubuntu
Evolution:
*remove attachements*
See thread: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=498483
It was a plug-in from the author in the debian repository which is now
empty
See link:
http://mentors.debian.net/d
On Wed, 2010-03-24 at 11:08 +0900, nomnex wrote:
> a *remove attachement* feature in the vanilla Evo would make things
> easy. What do you think? Is there a chance?
A "remove attachments" feature would probably be useful in some
circumstances (though of course it won't work if the message is signe
Am Mittwoch, den 24.03.2010, 11:08 +0900 schrieb nomnex:
> hi,
> There is a function I would like to be ported on the vanilla Ubuntu
> Evolution:
>
> *remove attachements*
>
> See thread: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=498483
>
> It was a plug-in from the author in the de
I have updated the FAQ:
http://live.gnome.org/Evolution/FAQ#Does_there_exist_a_plugin_to_remove_attachments_from_mails.3F
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
On Wed, 2010-03-24 at 07:43 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> A "remove attachments" feature would probably be useful in some
> circumstances (though of course it won't work if the message is signed).
> The place to ask for enhancements is http://bugzilla.gnome.org. If you
> do this, post the re
Am Donnerstag, den 25.03.2010, 08:40 +0900 schrieb nomnex:
> On Wed, 2010-03-24 at 07:43 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>
> > A "remove attachments" feature would probably be useful in some
> > circumstances (though of course it won't work if the message is signed).
> > The place to ask for enh
On Thu, 2010-03-25 at 08:40 +0900, nomnex wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-03-24 at 07:43 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>
> > A "remove attachments" feature would probably be useful in some
> > circumstances (though of course it won't work if the message is signed).
> > The place to ask for enhancements
On Thu, 2010-03-25 at 03:00 +0100, Thomas Mittelstaedt wrote:
> > FI: The FAQ links to an empty debian page and the plug-in you
> attached
> > won't work (at least for Ubuntu users of the Evo mailing list),
> unless
> > to read the comments on the rex's page [1] for the missing libraries
> > to
> >
