On Tue, 2019-01-08 at 07:05 +0100, Herr Oswald wrote:
> Third test run - online again
> First search carried out is slow
> All following searches are quick
Hi,
I'd guess it's due to the server being smart and cache the search
results, thus when the same search is run again it gets the
> To add to that: there is a setting to keep stored for offline only
> part
> of the folder, like several recent weeks/months/... Which means not
> every message can be downloaded locally.
>
> Having an optimization of "whole folder is stored for offline", then
> avoid server-side searching, can
On Fri, 2019-01-04 at 10:02 +0100, Herr Oswald wrote:
> Should it? - Or what does it actually do?
Hi,
the answer is here:
https://mail.gnome.org/archives/evolution-list/2018-December/msg00018.html
To add to that: there is a setting to keep stored for offline only part
of the folder, like
I'd like to come back to this question:
In "folder properties" I checked the box "copy folder contents locally
for offline mode" / see attached screen). I thought that this would
create a local data set, so that one would be searchable quickly.
It seems not to do so.
Should it? - Or what does
> However the best way to make such suggestions is to file a Request
> For
> Enhancement (RFE) on the Gitlab page, and post the link here so
> others
> can comment.
Done.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/evolution/issues/263
W
___
evolution-list
On Thu, 2018-12-13 at 11:35 +0100, Andrea Vai wrote:
> Hi Herr,
> Il giorno gio, 13/12/2018 alle 11.17 +0100, Herr Oswald ha scritto:
> > Thank you very much to everybody for all that clarification.
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > And another thing:
> > I've been using evo for 4 years now, but never had
> In my 3.28.5, the rollover text on the lens ("click here to change
> search type") is in my opinion (and, indeed, has been to me in the
> past) clear enough to invite people to click on it. Don't you have it
> the same way?
You got me... ):
Well, I'd say this solution is for the patient ones.
Hi Herr,
Il giorno gio, 13/12/2018 alle 11.17 +0100, Herr Oswald ha scritto:
> Thank you very much to everybody for all that clarification.
>
> [...]
>
> And another thing:
> I've been using evo for 4 years now, but never had the idea that the
> magnifier symbol could be home of a control. To
Thank you very much to everybody for all that clarification. One
question remains:
In "folder properties" I checked the box "copy folder contents locally
for offline mode" Usee attached screen). I thought that this would
create a local data set, that one should be searchable quickly.
Obviously it
On Wed, 2018-12-12 at 08:09 -0700, Zan Lynx wrote:
> Indeed. I regularly use ripgrep / rg to search multiple gigabytes of mail
> spool and it can do that faster than 23 seconds.
> _
Presumably its local mail spool, so that's unsurprising. The OP has his
mail on an IMAP server.
poc
On December 12, 2018 3:07:20 AM MST, Herr Oswald wrote:
>Am Mittwoch, den 12.12.2018, 09:42 +0100 schrieb Milan Crha via
>evolution-list:
>> On Wed, 2018-12-12 at 09:30 +0100, Herr Oswald wrote:
>> > When I do a keyword search, it
>> > takes 23 secs till I get the results.
>>
>> The 1300
On Wed, 2018-12-12 at 11:07 +0100, Herr Oswald wrote:
> With "whole message" as well? Is 23s for "search the whole news" with
> 1700 messages acceptable? - I think on a 8core xeon it should be
> faster.
Hi,
it's basically as Patrick said, though I'd be a bit more concrete,
because the
On Wed, 2018-12-12 at 11:07 +0100, Herr Oswald wrote:
> Allright. In "search", the slow folders do have "message contains",
> the
> fast ones "sender and abount contains". This is an explanation.
>
> Now - how can I change the setting?
Have you checked the user help?
On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 11:07:20 +0100, Herr Oswald wrote:
>Allright. In "search", the slow folders do have "message contains", the
>fast ones "sender and abount contains". This is an explanation.
>
>Now - how can I change the setting?
In the search bar at the left side is an icon. This icon most
On Wed, 2018-12-12 at 11:07 +0100, Herr Oswald wrote:
> > The 1300 messages in a folder is literally nothing, it should be
> > instant.
>
> Agreed.
> With "whole message" as well? Is 23s for "search the whole news" with
> 1700 messages acceptable? - I think on a 8core xeon it should be
> faster.
Am Mittwoch, den 12.12.2018, 09:42 +0100 schrieb Milan Crha via
evolution-list:
> On Wed, 2018-12-12 at 09:30 +0100, Herr Oswald wrote:
> > When I do a keyword search, it
> > takes 23 secs till I get the results.
>
> Hi,
> what is the exact search, please? Each folder can have its own
On Wed, 2018-12-12 at 09:30 +0100, Herr Oswald wrote:
> When I do a keyword search, it
> takes 23 secs till I get the results.
Hi,
what is the exact search, please? Each folder can have its own search
settings, thus be careful about all three search parts ("Show",
"Search" and "in"
17 matches
Mail list logo
