On Mon, 2007-07-16 at 15:24 +0300, Vladimir Sokolovsky wrote:
[ snip ]
Most of this proposal was just about splitting the packages up. That's
good, but it doesn't warrant much comment. It's not the existence of
different packages that will draw my comments, it's the *content* of the
packages th
> > Need to add mlx4 as a component too
>
> who has the permission to do so?
I can add it, who is the default owner for mlx4 bugs?
Scott
___
ewg mailing list
ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg
BEGIN:VCALENDAR
METHOD:REQUEST
PRODID:Microsoft CDO for Microsoft Exchange
VERSION:2.0
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:GMT -0500 (Standard) / GMT -0400 (Daylight)
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:16010101T02
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;WKST=MO;INTERVAL=1;BYMONTH=11;BYDAY=1SU
END:STANDARD
B
Steve Wise wrote:
Tziporet Koren wrote:
Must have general features:
* Kernel base on 2.6.23 (all new features that will be part of this
kernel will be included in OFED 1.3)
Note that the cxgb3 drivers are in kernel.org 2.6.23. They weren't in
the upstream ke
Tziporet Koren wrote:
Must have general features:
* Kernel base on 2.6.23 (all new features that will be part of this
kernel will be included in OFED 1.3)
Note that the cxgb3 drivers are in kernel.org 2.6.23. They weren't in
the upstream kernel when we starte
Reminder for all -- here is the dial-in information for the meeting:
Code: 2102061
US/Canada: +1.866.432.9903
India: +91.80.4103.3979
Israel: +972.9.892.7026
Others: http://cisco.com/en/US/about/doing_business/conferencing/
The Outlook invitation expires today; I'll make a new one
Hi All,
We have our OFED synch meeting today at 9am PST.
Agenda:
1. Merge the OFED 1.2.1 release with OFED 1.2.c release in August.
2. Agree on OFED 1.3 schedule:
* Feature freeze - Sep 4
* Alpha release - Sep 10
* Beta release - Sep 25
* RC1 - Oct 16
* RC2
Hi,
I am starting to work on the new installation procedure for OFED-1.3.
Please review and comment.
Main changes from OFED-1.2:
- Split ofa_user-1.2.src.rpm into separate sources RPMs per package.
* Requires RPM spec file for each package.
Currently, the following packages are lack of RPM
Tziporet Koren wrote:
Or Gerlitz wrote:
This is the point of adding 1.2.c to bugzilla (I actually just send a
direct mail to Scott requesting this)
OK, thanks.
Need to add mlx4 as a component too
who has the permission to do so?
Searching for mlx4 or connectx under the bugs.openfabrics.
Or Gerlitz wrote:
Scott Weitzenkamp (sweitzen) wrote:
It will be good if we can unify 1.2.c with 1.2.1 that was requested
in the same time frame
Any thoughts on this?
I am in favor of unifying them.
I don't see how 1.2.c can be official OFED release without having the
work process being tr
Scott Weitzenkamp (sweitzen) wrote:
It will be good if we can unify 1.2.c with 1.2.1 that was
requested in
the same time frame
Any thoughts on this?
I am in favor of unifying them.
I don't see how 1.2.c can be official OFED release without having the
work process being tracked through the
11 matches
Mail list logo
