thanks, applied 2 & 3.
___
ewg mailing list
ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg
thanks, applied.
> From: Anton Blanchard
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Roscher
please use '@' signs so these are real email addresses.
- R.
___
ewg mailing list
ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg
On Tue, 2009-04-21 at 17:16 +0200, Stefan Roscher wrote:
> From: Anton Blanchard
>
> To improve performance of driver ressource allocation,
> replace the vmalloc() call with kmalloc().
Just curious, but how big are these allocations? Why was vmalloc() even
ever used if we know they'll be small?
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 07:01:32 -0700
Roland Dreier wrote:
> > did you have a chance to take a look at the patchset and will you apply
> it, or
> > are there any outstanding issues we need to address?
>
> I guess it's OK, but definitely 2.6.31 material. I guess I'll stick it
> linux-next soon.
> did you have a chance to take a look at the patchset and will you apply it,
> or
> are there any outstanding issues we need to address?
I guess it's OK, but definitely 2.6.31 material. I guess I'll stick it
linux-next soon.
- R.
___
ewg mailing
Hi Roland,
did you have a chance to take a look at the patchset and will you apply it, or
are there any outstanding issues we need to address?
Regards,
Alex
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 16:02:28 +0200
Stefan Roscher wrote:
> In case of large queue pairs there is the possibillity of allocation failures
