Ralph Campbell wrote:
Comment #8 already identified the problem and a solution.
I think we would need to change the default value for
net.ipv4.neigh.ib0.unres_qlen to make it "permanent".
Can you send a patch for this?
Thanks
Tziporet
___
ewg mail
Sean Hefty wrote:
Subject: Do you still need the local SA in OFED 1.5?
The RDMA/IB CMs do not scale without PR caching or hard-coding PR parameters.
I'm personally fine removing it from OFED. MPI and other applications are
working around SA scaling issues by connecting over sockets anywa
Jeff Becker wrote:
Hi Vlad. Please pull from:
git://git.openfabrics.org/~jbecker/nfs_rdma_ofed_1_4.git
Thanks.
-jeff
___
ewg mailing list
ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg
Done,
Regards,
Vladimir
I'll let Tziporet answer that one, since OFED 1.4.1 is dragging
on a bit, perhaps OFED 1.5 feature freeze may also be
delayed a bit so that people have time to get all the new code
reviewed and such.
woody
-Original Message-
From: Or Gerlitz [mailto:ogerl...@voltaire.com]
Sent: Saturd
Lets bring this to the meting today
I actually wanted to propose to delay 1.5 since 1.4.1 was delayed.
In any case - if the EoIB code will not be ready it will not be in 1.5
Tziporet
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Robert J [mailto:robert.j.woodr...@intel.com]
Sent: Monday, May 04, 2
