Re: [ewg] core backports

Steve Wise wrote: Hey Tziporet, Is there an estimate as to when the core code will build against the various kernels? Jack is working on this now Jack - can you update the core status? Thanks Tziporet ___ ewg mailing list ewg@lists.openfabrics.o

[ewg] core backports

Hey Tziporet, Is there an estimate as to when the core code will build against the various kernels? Thanks, steve. ___ ewg mailing list ewg@lists.openfabrics.org http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg

Re: [ewg] ofed-1.5 and RH5.4

Steve Wise wrote: I didn't see RH5.4 in the ofed-1.5 plan. Is it going to be supported in 1.5, or is its release date too far out? It will - I guess I forgot it Tziporet ___ ewg mailing list ewg@lists.openfabrics.org http://lists.openfabrics.org/c

[ewg] ofed-1.5 and RH5.4

I didn't see RH5.4 in the ofed-1.5 plan. Is it going to be supported in 1.5, or is its release date too far out? Thanks, Steve. ___ ewg mailing list ewg@lists.openfabrics.org http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg

RE: [ofa-general] Re: [ewg] RFC: Do we wish to take MPI out of OFED?

I agree with DK from OSU. There are clear advantages to having MPI included with OFED. Not only will it make testing of a complete solution easier by both OFED and MPI suppliers, but it will also improve ease of use for end users. As DK points out there are continual improvements in MPIs whic

Re: [ofa-general] RE: [ewg] RFC: Do we wish to take MPI out ofOFED?

Agreed. Ofed and mpis don't ship often enough to create incompatible releases (ie we should be able to handle them separately through qa in both sets of release procedures). Thanks for the clarification. -jms Sent from my PDA. No type good. - Original Message - From: Doug Ledford T