[ewg] Which IPv6 multicast group to be used for mckey ?

Hi, I am new to infiniband technology, so do not have much more exposure of it. I have installed OFED-1.5 on my machine. I was trying to run mckey application with following *two different multicast groups*. mckey -M *FF10:0:0:0:0:0:0:B* -b 10.10.10.1 (receiver) mckey -M *FF10:0:0:0:0:0:0:C* -b

Re: [ewg] Which IPv6 multicast group to be used for mckey ?

Hi, I did google on this and found the following link: http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-r...@vger.kernel.org/msg00953.html As per above link: RDMA CM treats AF_INET6 addresses that are either 0 or prefixed with FF1x:A01B::/32 as MGIDs 1) So, does it mean that mckey works with multicast

Re: [ewg] problem with ipoib_mcast_fix_ip_ib_mc_map_to_2_6_24.patch

I am handling this. On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 09:54:34AM +0200, Tziporet Koren wrote: On 3/10/2010 9:05 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 08:57:17PM +0200, Eli Cohen wrote: On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 10:42:22AM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: I guess, the best fix is to revert

[ewg] ofa_1_5_kernel 20100311-0200 daily build status

This email was generated automatically, please do not reply git_url: git://git.openfabrics.org/ofed_1_5/linux-2.6.git git_branch: ofed_kernel_1_5 Common build parameters: Passed: Passed on i686 with linux-2.6.18 Passed on i686 with linux-2.6.19 Passed on i686 with linux-2.6.21.1 Passed on

[ewg] [ANNOUNCE] OFED 1.5.1 rc4 release is available

OFED 1.5.1-rc4 is available Notes: The tarball is available on: http://www.openfabrics.org/downloads/OFED/ofed-1.5.1/OFED-1.5.1-rc4.tgz To get BUILD_ID run ofed_info Please report any issues in bugzilla https://bugs.openfabrics.org/ for OFED 1.5.1 Vladimir Tziporet

Re: [ewg] [PATCH] ipoib: Fix lockup of the tx queue

good debugging, applied thanks. I do worry (as Moni mentioned) that this doesn't explain why you would get send failures in this case, but the patch itself is well-explained and looks obviously correct so I think we should apply it. -- Roland Dreier rola...@cisco.com For corporate legal

Re: [ewg] [PATCH] ipoib: Fix lockup of the tx queue

On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 13:38 -0800, Roland Dreier wrote: good debugging, applied thanks. I do worry (as Moni mentioned) that this doesn't explain why you would get send failures in this case, but the patch itself is well-explained and looks obviously correct so I think we should apply it.

Re: [ewg] [PATCH] ipoib: Fix lockup of the tx queue

Sorry, I was referring to my patch not Eli's. On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 13:41 -0800, Ralph Campbell wrote: On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 13:38 -0800, Roland Dreier wrote: good debugging, applied thanks. I do worry (as Moni mentioned) that this doesn't explain why you would get send failures in this

Re: [ewg] [PATCH] ipoib: Fix lockup of the tx queue

Sorry, I was referring to my patch not Eli's. Heh, I never would have said anything about your patch was obvious. I skimmed yours once but I do want to read it more carefully. Did you ever say what test case you are using to provoke the problem you're fixing? -- Roland Dreier

[ewg] RC4 build failure on FC12

Has anyone seen this? Install rds-tools RPM: Running rpm -iv /root/OFED-1.5.1-rc4/RPMS/fedora-release-11-1.noarch/x86_64/rds-tools-1.5-1.x86_64.rpm Build ibutils RPM Running rpmbuild --rebuild

Re: [ewg] [PATCH] ipoib: Fix lockup of the tx queue

On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 13:52 -0800, Roland Dreier wrote: Sorry, I was referring to my patch not Eli's. Heh, I never would have said anything about your patch was obvious. I skimmed yours once but I do want to read it more carefully. Did you ever say what test case you are using to provoke