On 1/11/2013 9:36 PM, Marciniszyn, Mike wrote:
I've opened OFED bz 2410 for this issue.
Mike
Great thanks.
I will apply the patch and release a new version to OFED website
tomorrow morning.
Ido
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Robert J
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2013 1:30 PM
To:
I've opened OFED bz 2410 for this issue.
Mike
> -Original Message-
> From: Woodruff, Robert J
> Sent: Friday, January 11, 2013 1:30 PM
> To: Marciniszyn, Mike; Elken, Tom; ewg@lists.openfabrics.org; Ido Shamai
> Subject: RE: Interop test failure using OFED-3.5 RC4
>
>
> Adding Shamai fr
Adding Shamai from Mellanox to this thread.
Woody
-Original Message-
From: ewg-boun...@lists.openfabrics.org
[mailto:ewg-boun...@lists.openfabrics.org] On Behalf Of Marciniszyn, Mike
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2013 7:51 AM
To: Elken, Tom; ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
Subject: Re: [ewg] Inte
On 1/11/2013 7:20 AM, Hefty, Sean wrote:
We have investigated and found that perftest was upgraded from v1.8 to v2.0
on 11/19/12, between RC3 and RC4.
Hi,
We did move from perftest-1.4 to perftest-2.0 last month.
It has the same logic and results as the older version + plenty of new
features.
This is definitely a perftest bug.
This is a significant re-write of these utilities and this bug is a regression
in the routine ctx_set_out_reads().
In 1.4 the code is this:
/**
*
*
Tom wrote,
> The EWG standard practice is that if a significant bug fix goes in, we would
> need another RC to enable others to easily test it.
> But perhaps it depends on whether the bug is in perftest, qib or elsewhere.
> In any case, we don't want a GA build until this > issue is solved.
Ye
> We have investigated and found that perftest was upgraded from v1.8 to v2.0
Tom, I was mistaken. The older perftest version is 1.4.
Mike
___
ewg mailing list
ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg
