RE: [ewg] RDMA in SDP

to enable features you need more quickly. Jim Mott From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of zhang Jackie Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2008 9:05 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [ewg] RDMA in SDP hi, I am reading the source code of SDP in OFED 1.2.5.1, I found

RE: [ofa-general] RE: [ewg] Not seeing any SDP performance changes inOFED 1.3 beta, and I get Oops when enabling sdp_zcopy_thresh

0 3.267e+10 131072.00249228 26348.30 1239807 Maximum Segment Size (bytes) -1 Thanks, JIm Jim Mott Mellanox Technologies Ltd. mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: 512-294-5481 -Original Message- From: Weikuan Yu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2008 9:09 AM

[ewg] RE: OFED-1.3-beta sdp issue

) file? This bug got picked up as a patch that gets applied by the build process instead of a change to base code. Perhaps it is not being picked up for PPC. I'll check it out. Thanks, JIm Jim Mott Mellanox Technologies Ltd. mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: 512-294-5481 From: Stefan Roscher

[ewg] RE: [PATCH] IB/sdp Fix a kernel panic in put_page() that was passingNULL

working. Thoughts? Thanks, JIm Jim Mott Mellanox Technologies Ltd. mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: 512-294-5481 -Original Message- From: Ralph Campbell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 30, 2007 5:07 PM To: Jim Mott Cc: EWG Subject: [PATCH] IB/sdp Fix a kernel panic

[ewg] RE: SDP / TCP_NODELAY

. That is my understanding anyway. If you have some code that does not seem to be running right, send it along and I will take a look. Thanks, JIm Jim Mott Mellanox Technologies Ltd. mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: 512-294-5481 -Original Message- From: Or Gerlitz [mailto:[EMAIL

[ewg] RE: SDP / TCP_NODELAY

. Thanks, JIm Jim Mott Mellanox Technologies Ltd. mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: 512-294-5481 -Original Message- From: Or Gerlitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2007 7:05 AM To: Jim Mott Cc: EWG Subject: Re: SDP / TCP_NODELAY Jim Mott wrote: SDP includes