Arlin - Thanks for the opportunity to talk with the EWG this morning. Do you
think ULPs can be included as either middleware or part of the application
layer?
From: Davis, Arlin R
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2019 4:33 PM
To: 'ewg@lists.openfabrics.org'
Cc: Paul Grun ; Jim Ryan
Su
We're looking for some dedicated, knowledgeable people to help shape the
Workshop by participating on the Technical Program Committee. Please see the
attached notice.
Regards,
-Paul Grun
Co-chair, 2018 Technical Program Committee
Vice Chair, OpenFabrics Alliance
Advanced Technology Group
>
>The founding imputus for OFA was to get this RDMA code upstream, so OFA
>should not be spending their resources supporting non-upstream works.
>
>
>Jason
>--
That's actually not true. The founding impetus was to prevent the nascent
InfiniBand industry from fracturing under the weight of mul
FWIW, I was able to SSH in using Bitvise. No problems.
-Original Message-
From: ewg [mailto:ewg-boun...@lists.openfabrics.org] On Behalf Of Steve Wise
Sent: Friday, March 04, 2016 7:01 AM
To: Ken Strandberg
Cc: ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
Subject: [ewg] flatbed ssh service down?
Hey Ken,
Good point Woody, thank you for the clarification.
> -Original Message-
> From: Woodruff, Robert J [mailto:robert.j.woodr...@intel.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 1:39 PM
> To: Paul Grun; 'Paulo R. Panhoto'; ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
> Subject: RE: [ewg] Gettin
alled "A Unified Approach
to Networks" which attempts to illustrate this point.
Regards,
-Paul Grun
> -Original Message-
> From: ewg-boun...@lists.openfabrics.org [mailto:ewg-
> boun...@lists.openfabrics.org] On Behalf Of Paulo R. Panhoto
> Sent: Monday, June 11
In addition, for those who are not aware, the OFA offers a two day course
called Programming with OpenFabrics Software, which is focused on OFED APIs
for Linux. The next edition of the course occurs in June.
http://www.openfabrics.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=12&I
temid=105
Sounds like a slight bit of confusion.
OFED verbs runs over a channel adapter. You have three choices of types of
channel adapters to use -
1.An InfiniBand HCA
2.An iWARP RNIC,
3.RoCE
You asked about the relationship between IB and RoCE, so let's leave iWARP
aside for now.
And just to complete the picture:
RoCE runs on top of Ethernet (layer 2)
IB runs on top of IB network, link and phy layers
iWARP runs on top of TCP/IP (as Steve says below).
Both RoCE and IB use the same transport layer.
> -Original Message-
> From: ewg-boun...@lists.openfabrics.org [mai
I can. Chapter 17 verse 3.1
17.3.1 Loopback
"An HCA shall be able to internally loopback a packet sent to itself. That
is,
the verbs layer can specify a packet to be delivered to the same port
(possibly
a different QP though). The packet shall be delivered without the
packet appearing on the port
Never mind.looks like there's an answer. Thanks.
-Paul
From: Paul Grun [mailto:pg...@systemfabricworks.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 12:21 PM
To: 'ewg@lists.openfabrics.org'
Subject: Forcing a port to fail to 1x
I have a client who is looking for help wit
I have a client who is looking for help with this:
>I am looking for a good way to force an SDR IB connection to fail back
>to a 1X width. Any ideas? I looked at ibportstate but it does not
>*seem* to support this.
Anybody here who has an easy answer at his fingertips?
-Paul
___
___
ewg mailing list
ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg
f merit, at
least in this case, in using an expression to describe the technology which
is crisp and unambiguous.
-Paul
-Original Message-
From: Roland Dreier [mailto:rdre...@cisco.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 2:14 PM
To: Paul Grun
Cc: 'Jason Gunthorpe'; 'Sean Hefty&
expression IBoE
creates unnecessary confusion by implying that RDMAoE includes elements of
IB from the five OSI layers, which is not an accurate description of the
proposal.
-Paul Grun
-Original Message-
From: ewg-boun...@lists.openfabrics.org
[mailto:ewg-boun...@lists.openfabrics.org] On
15 matches
Mail list logo
