>OK, I'm planning on sending this upstream later today. Looks very small
>and simple, and then we can figure our what if anything we want to do
>for 2.6.34.
>
>Make sense for everyone?
yes - thanks
___
ewg mailing list
ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
http://
Roland Dreier wrote:
> OK, I'm planning on sending this upstream later today. Looks very small
> and simple, and then we can figure our what if anything we want to do
> for 2.6.34.
>
> Make sense for everyone?
>
> - R.
>
Yes.
___
ewg mailing list
OK, I'm planning on sending this upstream later today. Looks very small
and simple, and then we can figure our what if anything we want to do
for 2.6.34.
Make sense for everyone?
- R.
--
Roland Dreier
For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/
>No. I only tested in on T3/iWARP. I don't have an IB setup available
>for testing.
Before posting the patch, I tested with IB on 2.6.33-rc6 and verified that the
results of rdma_bind_addr was as expected (returned 0, with no device attached).
I didn't see any side effects with limited testing.
Pradeep Satyanarayana wrote:
> Steve Wise wrote:
>
>> This patch works. It also backports cleanly to ofed-1.5.1/RH5.3.
>>
>> Acked-by: Steve Wise
>>
>> Steve.
>>
> Steve, Was this tested against both iWARP and IB?
>
>
No. I only tested in on T3/iWARP. I don't have an IB setup availa
Steve Wise wrote:
> This patch works. It also backports cleanly to ofed-1.5.1/RH5.3.
>
> Acked-by: Steve Wise
>
> Steve.
Steve, Was this tested against both iWARP and IB?
Thanks
Pradeep
___
ewg mailing list
ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
http://lists.ope
This patch works. It also backports cleanly to ofed-1.5.1/RH5.3.
Acked-by: Steve Wise
Steve.
Sean Hefty wrote:
> Revert the following change from commit
> 6f8372b69c3198e06cecb1df2cb9682d0c55e657:
>
>The defined behavior of rdma_bind_addr is to associate an RDMA
>device with an rdma_c
Revert the following change from commit
6f8372b69c3198e06cecb1df2cb9682d0c55e657:
The defined behavior of rdma_bind_addr is to associate an RDMA
device with an rdma_cm_id, as long as the user specified a non-
zero address. (ie they weren't just trying to reserve a port)
Currently, if
