On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 02:49:47PM -0800, Roland Dreier wrote:
>
> I don't see anything touching this code there. The patch that
> introduced this code upstream, 521e575b ("IB/mlx4: Add support for
> blocking multicast loopback packets") doesn't have this bug and I don't
> see anything else that
> > This bug doesn't seem to ever have been present in the upstream
> > kernel -- what are you generating this patch against?
> I think it came from your for-next branch.
I don't see anything touching this code there. The patch that
introduced this code upstream, 521e575b ("IB/mlx4: Add supp
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 02:33:31PM -0800, Roland Dreier wrote:
> This bug doesn't seem to ever have been present in the upstream
> kernel -- what are you generating this patch against?
>
I think it came from your for-next branch.
___
ewg mailing list
ew
This bug doesn't seem to ever have been present in the upstream
kernel -- what are you generating this patch against?
- R.
___
ewg mailing list
ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg
The "!" operator has precedence over the "&" operator so parenthesis are
required to properly evaluate the user's loopback requirement.
Signed-off-by: Eli Cohen
---
drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx4/main.c |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw
