On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 09:18:54AM -0700, Roland Dreier wrote:
I thought you were referring to the changes made by this patch
920d706. Should I re-send this patch?
Yes, please work out what changes are still required and send a new patch.
OK. I am sending a series of three patches. The
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 10:36:27AM -0700, Roland Dreier wrote:
Doesn't seem to be all there... eg there is nothing for ethernet headers.
I thought you were referring to the changes made by this patch
920d706. Should I re-send this patch?
___
ewg
I thought you were referring to the changes made by this patch
920d706. Should I re-send this patch?
Yes, please work out what changes are still required and send a new patch.
--
Roland Dreier rola...@cisco.com || For corporate legal information go to:
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 01:06:36PM -0700, Roland Dreier wrote:
2. Fix wrong implementation of ib_ud_header_init(). A different patch was
sent
to Roland.
This patch no longer applies, I guess because you already sent me this
fix (which is now upstream since 2.6.34-rc1).
Right, it's
Right, it's already applied.
Doesn't seem to be all there... eg there is nothing for ethernet headers.
--
Roland Dreier rola...@cisco.com || For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html
___
2. Fix wrong implementation of ib_ud_header_init(). A different patch was
sent
to Roland.
This patch no longer applies, I guess because you already sent me this
fix (which is now upstream since 2.6.34-rc1).
--
Roland Dreier rola...@cisco.com || For corporate legal information go to:
Add support functions to aid in packing IBoE packets.
Signed-off-by: Eli Cohen e...@mellanox.co.il
---
drivers/infiniband/core/ud_header.c | 100 ++
include/rdma/ib_pack.h | 29 +-
2 files changed, 92 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
Changes
