[ewg] [UPDATE][PATCH] IPoIB-UD 4K MTU patch against 2.6.24 ofed-1.3-git tree

2008-02-04 Thread Shirley Ma
I found one one line was out side "for loop" when merging this patch with current git-tree. This caused UD_POST_RCV_COUNT = 16 wrong. I have fixed it. This is the updated patch. Thanks Shirley Signed-off-by: Shirley Ma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- diff -urpN ofed_kernel_a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoi

Re: [ewg] [UPDATE][PATCH] IPoIB-UD 4K MTU patch against 2.6.24 ofed-1.3-git tree

2008-02-05 Thread Tziporet Koren
Shirley Ma wrote: I found one one line was out side "for loop" when merging this patch with current git-tree. This caused UD_POST_RCV_COUNT = 16 wrong. I have fixed it. This is the updated patch. Thanks Shirley Hi Shirley, Its seems to me that 4K MTU patch is not "cooked" enough for RC4.

Re: [ofa-general] Re: [ewg] [UPDATE][PATCH] IPoIB-UD 4K MTU patch against 2.6.24 ofed-1.3-git tree

2008-02-05 Thread Shirley Ma
Hello Tziporet, The problem was because of the last check in of small UDP performance patch. It changed the receiving path completely. And I only got less than one day to merge/test the patch with that patch on both intel and PPC platform. The patch was in good/stable shape before this

Re: [ofa-general] Re: [ewg] [UPDATE][PATCH] IPoIB-UD 4K MTU patch against 2.6.24 ofed-1.3-git tree

2008-02-05 Thread Tziporet Koren
Shirley Ma wrote: Hello Tziporet, The problem was because of the last check in of small UDP performance patch. It changed the receiving path completely. And I only got less than one day to merge/test the patch with that patch on both intel and PPC platform. The patch was in good/stable shape

Re: [ofa-general] Re: [ewg] [UPDATE][PATCH] IPoIB-UD 4K MTU patch against 2.6.24 ofed-1.3-git tree

2008-02-05 Thread Shirley Ma
Hello Tziporet, On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 18:56 +0200, Tziporet Koren wrote: > Shirley Ma wrote: > > > > Hello Tziporet, > > > > The problem was because of the last check in of small UDP performance > > patch. It changed the receiving path completely. And I only got less > > than one day to merge/te

Re: [ofa-general] Re: [ewg] [UPDATE][PATCH] IPoIB-UD 4K MTU patch against 2.6.24 ofed-1.3-git tree

2008-02-05 Thread Tziporet Koren
Shirley Ma wrote: 2.6.24 kernel, and I am going to test SLES10SP2 kernel. It has passed stress test the whole night for 2K MTU test suites. Please test on RHREL 5 too What are your stress tests? Appreciate you, Vlad and Eli's help here! There is one line change needed for backporting ++pri

Re: [ofa-general] Re: [ewg] [UPDATE][PATCH] IPoIB-UD 4K MTU patch against 2.6.24 ofed-1.3-git tree

2008-02-05 Thread Shirley Ma
Tziporet Koren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 02/05/2008 12:07:28 PM: > Please test on RHREL 5 too > What are your stress tests? Ok. The stress test is similar to netperf/netserver. But it's bi-directional multiple streams. I have stressed the stream to 150, duplex running overnight. > Please