Betsy Zeller wrote:
From what I've heard, there are currently applications using:
- libopensm
- libosmcomp
- libosmvendor
- libibcommon
Now that it is well understood that these libraries are intended to be
private, developers can move away from using them. But, in the meantime
it would be
On Sun, 2008-07-27 at 12:30 +0300, Sasha Khapyorsky wrote:
On 12:19 Sun 27 Jul , Tziporet Koren wrote:
Betsy Zeller wrote:
From what I've heard, there are currently applications using:
- libopensm
- libosmcomp
- libosmvendor
- libibcommon
Now that it is well understood that
I've gotten a lot of feedback that the division of libraries into
private and public is quite helpful.
From what I've heard, there are currently applications using:
- libopensm
- libosmcomp
- libosmvendor
- libibcommon
Now that it is well understood that these libraries are intended to be
