Ira Weiny wrote:
I agree. OFED should be downstream of kernel.org for as much as possible. New
features should be introduced there first.
Ira
I totally agree and we are going to send all patches to kernel.org soon.
Note that the changes are not only influencing kernel space but user
spa
On Wed, 7 Jan 2009 09:35:39 -0800
"Woodruff, Robert J" wrote:
> Doug wrote,
>
> >I'm not so much concerned over IBTA standards. I'm concerned over what
> >makes it into the upstream linux kernels. How much OFED's kernel
> >differs from the upstream kernel directly impacts supportability of the
Doug wrote,
>I'm not so much concerned over IBTA standards. I'm concerned over what
>makes it into the upstream linux kernels. How much OFED's kernel
>differs from the upstream kernel directly impacts supportability of the
>OFED stack in our products. The more it diverges, the higher the
>suppo
09 2:01 PM
> To: Hefty, Sean; Tziporet Koren; ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
> Cc: gene...@lists.openfabrics.org
> Subject: RE: [ewg] RE: OFED Jan 5, 2009 meeting minutes on OFED plans
>
> Sean, I think that's a good point. What it suggests to me is asking when
> someone proposes a "non-stand
> advance
>
> Thanks again, Jim
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ewg-boun...@lists.openfabrics.org
> [mailto:ewg-boun...@lists.openfabrics.org] On Behalf Of Sean Hefty
> Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 1:54 PM
> To: 'Tziporet Koren'; ewg@lists.openfabr
efty, Sean; Tziporet Koren; ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
Cc: gene...@lists.openfabrics.org
Subject: RE: [ewg] RE: OFED Jan 5, 2009 meeting minutes on OFED plans
Sean, I think that's a good point. What it suggests to me is asking when
someone proposes a "non-standard" feature,
ics.org
[mailto:ewg-boun...@lists.openfabrics.org] On Behalf Of Sean Hefty
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 1:54 PM
To: 'Tziporet Koren'; ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
Cc: gene...@lists.openfabrics.org
Subject: [ewg] RE: OFED Jan 5, 2009 meeting minutes on OFED plans
>* Mellanox suggested to add IB o
>* Mellanox suggested to add IB over Eth - this is similar to iWARP but
>more like IB (e.g. including UD), and can work over ConnectX.
>A concern was raised by Intel (Dave Sommers) since it is not a standard
>transport.
>Decision: This request will be raised in the MWG, and they should decide
>if O
