RE: [ewg] Re: [PATCH 7/9] rdma/cm: fix loopback address support

2009-11-25 Thread David J. Wilder
On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 09:28 -0800, Sean Hefty wrote: Pradeep, earlier you wanted to hear the rdma-cm maintainer opinion on inclusion of this 2.6.33-rc1 patch set (which isn't finalized by-the-way, Jason still has fixes to submit), any reason to skip it now? I agree with Or lets have

RE: [ewg] Re: [PATCH 7/9] rdma/cm: fix loopback address support

2009-11-25 Thread Sean Hefty
Sean, is the patch series (9 patches) you sent earlier still current? Jason, do you have any updates? Roland added at least one change to fix the build when ipv6 is not enabled. I would check his for-next branch to see what he actually has queued. - Sean

[ewg] Re: [PATCH 7/9] rdma/cm: fix loopback address support

2009-11-24 Thread Or Gerlitz
Sean Hefty sean.he...@intel.com wrote: I will create a new librdmacm package that corresponds with the changes I made all my testing of the patch set with librdmacm 1.0.10 and patched 2.6.32-rc5 kernel, where as I wrote you, I was focusing on AF_INET/PS_TCP and AF_INET/PS_IPOIB. I understand

[ewg] RE: [PATCH 7/9] rdma/cm: fix loopback address support

2009-11-24 Thread Sean Hefty
So what will this new librdmacm package will let cover which wasn't possible so far? do you refer to ipv6 support in mckey? anything else? Changes were your changes to mckey, plus changes Dave added to cmatose to support IPv6. The actual library itself hasn't been modified. - Sean

[ewg] Re: [PATCH 7/9] rdma/cm: fix loopback address support

2009-11-24 Thread Or Gerlitz
Changes were your changes to mckey, plus changes Dave added to cmatose to support IPv6.  The actual library itself hasn't been modified. okay, got it. I was under the impression that mckey still misses an option to get from the user an ipv6 multicast address which isn't all zeros nor unmapped,

[ewg] RE: [PATCH 7/9] rdma/cm: fix loopback address support

2009-11-24 Thread Sean Hefty
okay, got it. I was under the impression that mckey still misses an option to get from the user an ipv6 multicast address which isn't all zeros nor unmapped, correct? or the -m option will work with both ipv4 and ipv6 addresses? The -m and -b options work with IPv4 and IPv6 addresses. - Sean

Re: [ewg] Re: [PATCH 7/9] rdma/cm: fix loopback address support

2009-11-23 Thread Pradeep Satyanarayana
ewg-boun...@lists.openfabrics.org wrote on 11/22/2009 02:36:32 AM: Pradeep Satyanarayana wrote: Roland Dreier wrote: Thanks... in any case I applied all 9 of the patches in this series. Thanks for pulling all this together. Sean, Thanks a lot for pulling it all together. Can we

[ewg] Re: [PATCH 7/9] rdma/cm: fix loopback address support

2009-11-22 Thread Tziporet Koren
Pradeep Satyanarayana wrote: Roland Dreier wrote: Thanks... in any case I applied all 9 of the patches in this series. Thanks for pulling all this together. Sean, Thanks a lot for pulling it all together. Can we consider including this into OFED-1.5 too? Pradeep Pradeep If

[ewg] Re: [PATCH 7/9] rdma/cm: fix loopback address support

2009-11-19 Thread Pradeep Satyanarayana
Roland Dreier wrote: Thanks... in any case I applied all 9 of the patches in this series. Thanks for pulling all this together. Sean, Thanks a lot for pulling it all together. Can we consider including this into OFED-1.5 too? Pradeep ___ ewg mailing