[ewg] RE: features / freeze

2009-05-04 Thread Tziporet Koren
Lets bring this to the meting today I actually wanted to propose to delay 1.5 since 1.4.1 was delayed. In any case - if the EoIB code will not be ready it will not be in 1.5 Tziporet -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Robert J [mailto:robert.j.woodr...@intel.com] Sent: Monday, May 04,

[ewg] Re: features / freeze

2009-05-04 Thread Or Gerlitz
Tziporet Koren wrote: In any case - if the EoIB code will not be ready it will not be in 1.5 Unlike the IBoE patchset, EoIB is more of a stand alone in the sense that it adds a driver to the IB stack and generally speaking doesn't touch other components, where the IBoE patches touch many

[ewg] RE: features / freeze

2009-05-04 Thread Tziporet Koren
We will send the code to review when its ready. Tziporet -Original Message- From: Or Gerlitz [mailto:ogerl...@voltaire.com] Sent: Monday, May 04, 2009 12:49 PM To: Tziporet Koren Cc: Woodruff, Robert J; Roland Dreier (rdreier); ewg Subject: Re: features / freeze Tziporet Koren wrote:

[ewg] Re: features / freeze

2009-05-03 Thread Or Gerlitz
Woodruff, Robert J wrote: Yes, in general we have agreed in the EWG that any code that goes into OFED should first be reviewed and accepted for upstream inclusion (or at least be accepted by Roland for a future kernel.org kernel.) before it goes into OFED. Given that the feature freeze for

[ewg] RE: features / freeze

2009-05-03 Thread Woodruff, Robert J
I'll let Tziporet answer that one, since OFED 1.4.1 is dragging on a bit, perhaps OFED 1.5 feature freeze may also be delayed a bit so that people have time to get all the new code reviewed and such. woody -Original Message- From: Or Gerlitz [mailto:ogerl...@voltaire.com] Sent: