Misguided and arrogant, as the service actually costs you nothing.
It costs me nothing, it costs the employers a substantial commission,
which can be better used on the systems they run.
You fail to explain how you feel entitled to spam this list,
particularly in light of your recent
The chosen hourly rate is laughable - even in the current economy, if I
was interviewing someone and they pitched themselves that low, I'd laugh
them out of the building. Particularly with Dr. and Internet
Engineer type declarations.
In which country? That is a fair rate in the UK. It may
Yes, but we probably don't have such hangups about using search sites,
or have our own network of contacts that might be able to help us.
I am using the network, and some agencies as well. Under the
circumstances, I wonder why you are protesting so much. Do you, perhaps,
have something to
We have our network subnetted that way to provide two broadcast doamins of
1022 hosts each. This is not an improper method of subneting for two
networks. We just use large networks. This best suites our organizational
needs and has worked for over five years. The problem regarding our NT
I am trying to build my first Win2k Exch2000 server.
I have win2k set up as a backup domain controller.
When I create a user it goes though the part where it creates the exchange
mailbox, but when I go to Exchange system manager and look there are no
mailboxes.
When I go to properties for the
Hello
I have got an Exchange 2000 server serving multiple email domains. When
the server creates NDR's, error reports or other system information, it
uses the actual Windows 2000 servername in the report. For eksample a NDR
would contain the following text:
The mailbox wont show up in the ESM until the user opens their mailbox for
the first time or an email is sent to that user.
-Original Message-
From: RACHEL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2001 1:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: mailbox not creating
I am
M...exercises in masochism
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2001 11:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: AV! a full time job?
Kumindra, I respectfully disagree.
Martin is correct on this one. The LAST thing
But it was on clearance! We thought we were getting a good deal!
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Disaster recovery planning for the new year.
That's what you get for buying
Actually the real problem with those boxes is that they are less powerful
than my laptop and run every BackOffice application you can think of, all NT
services (DNS, DHCP etc), run TWO virus scanners AND serve as domain
controllers. It's like using a dodge neon to haul a freight train.
S.
Same server?
-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2001 11:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving mailboxes
No we are not using exmerge? What is that and how will that help us? Does
the server has to be down to run
Turn on the television and see whats happened - 9-11-2001
John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981
With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. - RFC 1925
-Original Message-
From: Garrish, Robert B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gary is singing the song that's in everybody's head. He doesn't have
anything to hide and has been a very valuable contributor to this list.
Your post is nothing but spam.
S/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 6:06
We're not right now (hopefully never!) but we still have to geared up to
accept and deal with it.
PBB
~ndi
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 31 December 2001 15:24
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New year, no contract
A Euro (sp?) is
Hi
HAPPY NEW YEAR!
Anyway... I am about to remove a server from our exchange site and I was
wondering if Custom Recipients and Distribution Lists have a home server?
This particular server was the first exchange server we had and most of the
original Distribution Lists and Custom Recipients we
And addresses don't appear until after the RUS has applied the recipient
policy. If you wait 15 minutes does the account get an address?
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage!
-Original Message-
From: Andy David
Rachel,
From your suggestion of a BDC with all due respect; I would look at the
structure of Windows 2000 before I rushed into the Exchange 2000 world.
That aside historically, there was a huge debate on the merits of
putting exchange on a BDC.
Now with exchange 2000 the idea of it residing on a
They have a site, but not a server. No reason for concern unless it is the
last server in the site.
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage!
-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday,
Ok cool, thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 7:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: home server?
They have a site, but not a server. No reason for concern unless it is the
last server in the site.
Chris
--
Chris,
I would agree with you but saying Exch2k resides on a BDC.
Sounds like a configuration issue unless that was a freudian slip.
Sean McGilligan
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: December 31 2001 11:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
For the vast majority of organizations putting Exchange on a BDC doesn't
really matter 1 way or another IMHO.
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage!
-Original Message-
From: McGilligan, Sean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Quick question for you all, as Trend is closed for the holidays.
Scan mail scans all emails coming from the IMC. What if a user inside the
company sends a virus (marker-gen in this case) to a DL.
Will/should scan mail pick up that virus when its used by the IS or MTA? Or
will this only be
Chris,
Your right.
I always thought Exchange 5.5 on a BDC wasn't an issue and that was a
personal choice.
As long as your whole backup strategy was sound.
But people liked to debate on that, as witnessed on this list about 3
years ago.
But exchange 2000 on a domain controller especially if it
Trend is /closed/ for the holidays?! What version of ScanMail are you
running and how is the message being sent?[1]
[1] Via Outlook with the Exchange service?
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage!
-Original Message-
From:
I think it really depends on the organization in question. Certainly if I
were Sprint or BT I wouldn't have Exchange on a DC, but for other
organizations it might be appropriate. Certainly if I had my druthers, I'd
not have my FSMO roles handled by the same server...
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
If you have any questions at all, don't remove the server YET. Just turn it
off. Watch event logs and listen to users. You should know in a few days if
everything is kosher.
-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 7:51 AM
To:
Oh absolutely. I wont reassign the server for months. Watch and wait.
e-
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 8:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: home server?
If you have any questions at all, don't remove
Just stop the Exchange services on it. You don't have to wait for months!
-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 11:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: home server?
Oh absolutely. I wont reassign the server for months.
And watch my phone turn into a xmas tree. :)
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 8:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: home server?
Just stop the Exchange services on it. You don't have to wait for months!
Thank you Serdar - I appreciate that.
Paul - I'm going to walk away from this one now, but with two final
clarifications:
(a) I'm English, with an office in Crawley, West Sussex. I happen to spend
most of my time in the US, but I'm fully cognizant of the UK employment
situation, and I have
Ya..I called the tech line, and it said they were closed until Jan 2nd!
*shrug*
I have the 3.52 version, and its being sent as #1 described.
Would that internal email be scanned?
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:57 AM
If you are using 3.52 then you are using the AVAPI, this would cause the
message to be scanned as it is written to the store (in this case it would
be as it is going into the outbox), so it would be scanned before being sent
(so who the message is addressed to wouldn't matter).
Chris
--
Chris
mm
loose goose...
-Original Message-
From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 11:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New year, no contract
Thank you Serdar - I appreciate that.
Paul - I'm going to walk away from this one now, but
Sorry about that Martin...should have given credit where it is due :-)
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 6:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Top Ten Statements or Phrases - Year 2001
::Taking a bow::
Ok, thanks. I'm confused as to how that Marker virus to go to our users.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SCanmail and MTA
If you are using 3.52 then you are using the
Have you checked to make sure the software is functioning properly? Try
sending through a copy of eicar.com.
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage!
-Original Message-
From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday,
Exactly!!
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 8:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SCanmail and MTA
Try sending through a copy of eicar.com.
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't
Your English? I just thought you typed funny...hmmm
-Original Message-
From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 8:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New year, no contract
Thank you Serdar - I appreciate that.
Paul - I'm going to walk
Oops, spelling retardYOU'RE
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 8:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New year, no contract
Your English? I just thought you typed funny...hmmm
-Original Message-
From: Slinger, Gary
A Euro (sp?) is running about 88 cents U.S.
Besides, I thought the UK wasn't going to implement the Euro.
Look at the email address. I run my Income in Ireland and France.
Anyway, if I can accept them, I may as well do so, my local Tesco's and
Walmart do too.
--
Dr Paul Cummins -
Gary is singing the song that's in everybody's head. He doesn't have
anything to hide and has been a very valuable contributor to this list.
That's a matter of opinion, of course.
Your post is nothing but spam.
I disagree. My posting is off-topic, but not spam.
--
Dr Paul Cummins -
The consensus in this list about putting Exchange on a domain controller
generally focused on two issues, load and recovery.
A DC introduces extra load, but most small- to medium-sized
organizations wouldn't notice any difference. This argument actually
gains weight with Windows 2000 because
When I first deployed E2K on a single 2000 server for a customer, I told
them that this is not the best way but they had no budget for any additional
servers. Since then they decided to have OWA as their primary client and
install Verisn SSL all on the same box which also obviously is running
Well, that worked. I sent it through, and it blocked the extension .com. I
renamed it to no extension, and it said it couldn't be cleaned, and moved it
to my quarantine folder. Wonder if my server hiccupped during that huge DL
email?
Well, I learned about using eicar today...so I can go home
I would characterize it as meeting the triple criteria:
1. unsolicited -- We didn't ask for it and many of us find it annoying
to boot.
2. commerical -- You are explicitly selling yourself (who are you to
call others pimps?!).
3. e-mail
Hence your post qualifies as Spam.
Ed Crowley
Compaq
Does 3.52 have the option to disable the avapi? I could see the mapi
scanning alone failing under DL load.
-Original Message-
From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 11:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SCanmail and MTA
Well, that
I would characterize it as meeting the triple criteria:
1. unsolicited -- We didn't ask for it and many of us find it annoying
to boot.
2. commerical -- You are explicitly selling yourself (who are you to
call others pimps?!).
3. e-mail
Hence your post qualifies as Spam.
Ah well...
At this point, I'd probably stand back and let them try it and see if it
works. Doesn't seem like they pay attention to your recommendations
anyway.
Ed Crowley
Compaq Computer
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse
Sent: Monday,
Yes, it does. I just unchecked it. The DL was our Global DL, that has all
600 employees in it. Probably gave scanmail a sucker punch. :)
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 11:12 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
Don't turn off AVAPI, or you will really be screwed the next time that
happens.
PERSONALLY, I would use AVAPI, MAPI, and Message Body Scanning, along with
Ext blocking.
-Original Message-
From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:19 AM
To: Exchange
That, of course, is entirely your choice.
Speaking for myself, I wasn't really peeved from your plea for help
since I was blissfully unaware of your history. I am, however, more
annoyed by your insistence on rebutting every single point whether or
not your arguments have any logical or factual
Oh I forgot to mention. It's a school district so if you have any experience
with them then you know what fun it is. On the plus side a 4 weeks project
is on it's 5th month.
At this point, I'd probably stand back and let them try it and see if it
works. Doesn't seem like they pay attention
My wife works for a school district. Her email hasn't worked for 3 months. I
have even offered to fix it for the whole district for free, just so I can
email her.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:32 AM
To: Exchange
I imagine some are better than others. My experience is that it doesn't
matter so much as to what the organization is as it is whether the
people involved know as much as they think they do. The least informed
customers can sometimes be the best customers if they know enough to get
out of the
Their current system is Eudora (2.) something. The toughest part was getting
all the user/group info over. There is no direct migration method. Had to
use an import tool from Tools4ever.com to import passwords along with all
other info. Worked like a charm. Neat tool. Could have used
I am looking for a way to have users use POP3 on EX5.5 but not having them
use the server that stores the mail.
The enviroment has 2 EX5.5 servers, one for relay. I was thinking of using
Appendix H - How to configure the IIS SMTP service as a mail relay. but
do not know how to setup POP3 other
Ed,
I would agree with you in principle.
But the argument doesn't stand when you talk about a product like Small
Business Server.
They are catering for a market that doesn't accept buy hardware is
cheap, philosophy.
The people in the lower tier obviously want the toys but cannot afford
the
LDAP. At my last job, we did an HTML page that searched the LDAP database
and posted the info in a table.
~
-K.Borndale
Network Administrator
Sybari Software
631.630.8569 -direct dial
631.439.0689 -fax
http://www.sybari.com
One man's ceiling is
Huh???
BTW, IIS is not a POP server, it is an SMTP server. It doesn't handle
mailboxes.
Lets try this from another angle. Why do your users need POP3, and why if
you insist on doing this, do you not want to use what you already have?
-Original Message-
From: John Q [mailto:[EMAIL
I never talk about SBS.
Ed Crowley
Compaq Computer
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of McGilligan,
Sean
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: mailbox not creating
Ed,
I would agree with you in
I never talk about the Special Boat Service either
Sean McGilligan
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: December 31 2001 1:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: mailbox not creating
I never talk about SBS.
Ed Crowley
Compaq Computer
There is a KB article on removing the first server in the site. Read it and
follow it.
- Original Message -
From: Hansen, Eric [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:43 AM
Subject: home server?
Hi
HAPPY NEW YEAR!
Anyway... I
I think Chris answered my question, but to answer your reply, I have a few
users who need POP3 access but they log into the server w/ the mailboxes on
it. I would like to close this port from the outside if possible.
I was going to put another EX5.5 in the site and have users connect to that
w/
How about use IMAP and SSL?
-Original Message-
From: John Q [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: POP3
I think Chris answered my question, but to answer your reply, I have a few
users who need POP3 access but they log
Unless you configured a specific DL expansion server, you shouldn't have an
issue with DLs.
-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: home server?
Hi
HAPPY NEW YEAR!
Anyway... I am
Chris,
What are the concerns about the last server in the site? I must admit to
not ever seeing any warnings regarding this in all my education. I only ask
because what was effectively my last server in the site was stolen a month
ago! This is all assuming we are talking 5.5...
Regards
PBB
Stolen? Share this story!!
-Original Message-
From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: home server?
Chris,
What are the concerns about the last server in the site? I must admit to
not ever seeing any
Sounds good. Not too familiar w/ it! Let me do some reading. Anything worth
reading that you know about
-John Q
- Original Message -
From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 11:14 AM
Subject: RE: POP3
How
Thats interesting Gary - I'm in Crawley as well!
PBB
~ndi
-Original Message-
From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 31 December 2001 16:33
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New year, no contract
Thank you Serdar - I appreciate that.
Paul - I'm going to walk away
Not off hand, but I'm sure MS has something.
IMAP is natively supported in Exch. It is just a matter of punching a couple
of holes in the FW (and closing the POP ones), then configuring mail
clients.
-Original Message-
From: John Q [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 31,
Office break-in. they had everthing away, PC's, server, even the dishwasher
and the kettle!
This was the last site that I had added to the WAN and ironically - feeding
into the present discussions, it was a NT4 BDC with Ex5.5!
PBB
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone
O.K I see where you are going. Does IMAP use the same type authentication as
POP3?
- Original Message -
From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 11:36 AM
Subject: RE: POP3
Not off hand, but I'm sure MS has
A couple of holes? Why not just the one needed?
IMAP: POP done right. - Paul Robichaux
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: POP3
Not off hand, but I'm sure MS has
Sorry, wasn't thinking...
993
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: POP3
A couple of holes? Why not just the one needed?
IMAP: POP done right. - Paul Robichaux
I agree with Tom. We've been using NAV corporate (NAV for Gateways, NAV
Exchange and NAV on the desktops) for a year and have no, none, nada,
zippo outbreaks. It's performed flawlessy through bombardment of the
many viruses of 2001.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier
And then SSL SMTP for outbound (to allow for forced authentication)?
I'm going through the same thing right now trying to beef up security while
moving some servers.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 1:44 PM
To:
Use OWA w. SSL and forget everything else.
-Original Message-
From: Mood, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 11:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: POP3
And then SSL SMTP for outbound (to allow for forced authentication)?
I'm going through the
The last one in the site as in the last one installed into the site has no
significance. The last one in the site as in there are no other servers in
the site makes it special.
- Original Message -
From: Paul Bouzan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
I concur. ;)
William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+, ExchangeMVP
---
Why just ride, when you can fly?
http://www.airborne.net
---
Rent this space: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
Ill take Vegas! Pretty much anywhere but Los Angles
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 12:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC next year
I concur. ;)
William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+, ExchangeMVP
2½ months behind in your reading, William?
Ed Crowley
Compaq Computer
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Lefkovics,
William
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 12:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC next year
I concur. ;)
He'll get to the Top Ten of 2001 in March...
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 4:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC next year
2½ months behind in your reading, William?
Ed Crowley
Compaq Computer
-Original
Yea, but how many of those 20 have seen you sober?
-Original Message-
From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 11:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New year, no contract
Thank you Serdar - I appreciate that.
Paul - I'm going to walk
I coulda sent Test ;)
William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+
---
Why just ride, when you can fly?
http://www.airborne.net
---
Rent this space: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From:
You could delete mad.exe...
William
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 6:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Mad at My Exchange Server
I cannot find where my users deleted items are and it still shows that there
is
How would one know?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 1:28 PM
I'm helping to build the intranet for our company and I'm looking to have
the personnel Data (Phone Numbers, Direct Reports, Etc..) pulled from
Exchange.
Does anyone have any recommendations or examples they may be able to forward
on?
Joshua Morgan
PROFITLAB
Network Engineer
PH: (864)
Upgrade to win2k and use AD.
--Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE, CKST
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Morgan, Joshua
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 11:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange and Intranet
I'm helping to
Video tape and fuji film.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New year, no contract
How would one know?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer
89 matches
Mail list logo
