Re: Brightmail

2002-09-28 Thread Peter Szabo
Don't worry ;-) /Peter - Original Message - From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 8:07 AM Subject: RE: Brightmail Yeah, me stupid foreigner :) I mis-read legit vs illegit. -Original Message- From:

RE: Scanmail price increase

2002-09-28 Thread William Lefkovics
That's a lot of strikeouts. William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 12:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Scanmail price increase They could charge 50K, I still

RE: Scanmail price increase

2002-09-28 Thread Martin Blackstone
Trend (using all their products) has never struck out for me. That's why I think it is so valuable. An antivirus system that only works 99% of the time isn't good enough. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2002 7:58 AM To:

RE: Scanmail price increase

2002-09-28 Thread Andy David
Of course, some would argue that the best defense is deploying multiple AV engines across the enterprise since each product has strengths and weaknesses. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2002 11:18 AM To: Exchange

RE: IMC as relay system (off topic)

2002-09-28 Thread William Lefkovics
Exchange2000 queue management is ok on a single server. Adequate comes to mind. When there are 50 servers in an org it can get frustrating. Have you seen the queue management in Titanium? Yes. On several builds. William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: MEC

2002-09-28 Thread Ed Crowley
Yeah, TechEd used to have an infrastructure track, then they dropped it and left a developer focus and I quit going. Now it looks like they're putting it back. My experience was that the bulk of the TechEd infrastructure sessions were repeats of MEC or vice-versa anyway. Oh well, I'll be able

RE: Scanmail price increase

2002-09-28 Thread Ed Crowley
I would argue that the best defense would be disconnecting from the Internet and searching and destroying all floppies at the door. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL

RE: Scanmail price increase

2002-09-28 Thread Great Cthulhu Jones
No. Best defense is to remove all mice, keyboards, monitors, and floppy disk drives. Only allow CD-ROMS and set them to autoplay, so everyone can listen to music CDs at their typewriters. Sure, it's inconvenient, but that's the price you pay for security. (:= -Original Message- From:

RE: Scanmail price increase

2002-09-28 Thread Ed Crowley
Also, move the platen to the far right or left when erasing so as not to jam the machine. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf

RE: Scanmail price increase

2002-09-28 Thread Great Cthulhu Jones
I prefer they not erase, but retype the document entirely. (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2002 12:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Scanmail price increase Also, move the platen