Hi Guys,
We admit that this looked like spam a lot. I actually
called the people who sent it for us and complained.
The company who own this database and emailed it for
us are MSD2D, they have worked for years for Microsoft
building their trade show list and catalogs. That's why
you are on their
That was my line!
** Please prefix your subject header with BETA for posts dealing with
Exchange 2003 **
--
Martin Tuip
MVP Exchange
Exchange 2000 List owner
www.exchange-mail.org
www.sharepointserver.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
- Original Message
KVS has a very mature product ...
** Please prefix your subject header with BETA for posts dealing with
Exchange 2003 **
--
Martin Tuip
MVP Exchange
Exchange 2000 List owner
www.exchange-mail.org
www.sharepointserver.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
-
You're using a Pix with the SMTP fixup protocol (blech) so not able to
test it... But if you've set a limit on the connector of 2MB, user
specified limits will not override. 2MB seems a tad bit onerous.
-Original Message-
From: Exchange List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Saturday,
On the IMS you can specify routing by domain... For the domain(s) in
question you would specify an IP address which the VPN link would know
how to route to the appropriate endpoint. We did this several times with
customers when I worked for $vbc.
-Original Message-
From: MSX dude [mailto:
Actually, there is a kick ass product from MessageWare
(www.messageware.com) that I'm seriously considering implementing in my
environment which does that and more. Unfortunately I don't see it on
their site yet (brand new, saw a demo of it at TechEd) or the name of
it... AttachMate for OWA? Maybe?
I've seen similar behavior with a corrupt OST file.. Perhaps that is
what is happening here?
-Original Message-
From: Jasa, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 12:17 PM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Messages supposedly not being deleted
Subject: Messages suppo
I hear MVPs are overrated.
-Original Message-
From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 11:37 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Suggested reading for Exchange 5.5?
Subject: RE: Suggested reading for Exchange 5.5?
Try the MS Newsgroup usually an MVP o
You could create 2 mailboxes, each with the name needed and on one use the
other mailbox as alternate recipient.
** Please prefix your subject header with BETA for posts dealing with
Exchange 2003 **
--
Martin Tuip
MVP Exchange
Exchange 2000 List owner
www.exchange-mail.or
This product doesn't exactly meet your design goals out of the box
(AFAIK), but it's still quite interesting for both the scenario you
describe as well as internal consolidation of attachment storage.
http://www.attachstore.com/
http://www.attachstore.com/products/exchange.shtml
-Original Mes
Do you take down GCs routinely then?
-Original Message-
From: Pham, Tuan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Thursday, June 05, 2003 10:11 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Global Catalog and EX2K
Subject: Global Catalog and EX2K
Is it true that OL2K can't redirect to the new GC once t
Check the SMTP protocol logs at the exit point to your domain... Verify
the data is correct when it leaves your environment. If you can do this,
then start looking to them for issues...
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Thursday, June 05, 2003
That solves a problem, but potentially introduces additional interesting
ones such as clients talking to DS Access across a WAN instead of a
GC sitting in the same building with them.
-Original Message-
From: Pham, Tuan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Thursday, June 05, 2003 10:2
Not sure I know enough about your environment to speak definitively to
your scenario, though I've seen similar things done with great success.
I will however offer this bit of advice, more GCs = Good. With 2 GCs for
Exchange, failure of 1 puts entirely too much stress on the remaining
server for 5k
For a group mailbox, use a mailbox and assign the group permissions to
it.
-Original Message-
From: Crumbaker, Ron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Thursday, June 05, 2003 3:00 PM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Mailbox Group
Subject: Mailbox Group
I'm needing to setup a support type
I'm never going to wash my MessageOne shirt ( not that I wash any of them).
Thanks to MessageOne and Chris for a great party and a memorable night.
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 2:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
Yes. It's used to communicate with 5.5 servers in the site among other
things.
-Original Message-
From: Pham, Tuan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Friday, June 06, 2003 1:47 PM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Message Transfer Agent
Subject: Message Transfer Agent
Hi,
Is MTA is use
KVS and AttachStor are technologies worth looking at.
www.mail-resources.com has a number of other 3rd party tools listed in
the web links | server | archival section I believe.
-Original Message-
From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Friday, June 06, 2003 3:02 PM
Post
Frigging Lyris...
Delete the users and the views will go away automatically. Views only
exist for the criteria for which they were created. When valid objects
fit the criteria there is no way to remove the object other than
deleting the objects which meet the criteria or changing the criteria.
--
19 matches
Mail list logo
