I think it means you haven't loaded the Exchange System Manager on the
system on which you're using the event log viewer.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMA
Yes you're right...
As an aside, I just turned off the emanager component of Trend and this
seems to have helped quite a bit with the CPU load. I'll do some monitoring
next week to find out for sure...
> -Original Message-
> From: Randal, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 04 July 20
Nope, wrong. Once again you're assuming that all your desktops
are happily protected and working fine, in fact that every
link in the chain is in place and secure. With viruses you
cannot ensure that. You have to attack viruses robustly on
ALL fronts, with as few assumptions as possible.
The "i
Yes, I see your point, although I'd hope my desktop AV would catch this
stuff before it reaches the exchange server.
What I don't like is the burden of a realtime scan on exchange. Perhaps a
combination of gateway scanning, nightly mailbox scans and realtime desktop
AV would be sufficient.
>
Do you really think that the *ONLY* possible way a virus can get into your
Exchange environment is through your SMTP gateway?
Let's say a user uses Outlook to POP an email from their personal account
into their Exchange mailbox, and that email is infected. Or let's say that a
user downloads a file
For one, email-borneviruses originating from within your organisation
(especially those with recipients within your organisation) will be
trapped that way. Don't forget that the first thing some of these
pesky viruses do is disable the desktop PC's antivirus software.
Perimeter fence security alo
why?
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason Clishe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 04 July 2003 15:21
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: best linux av?
>
>
> It is absolutely essential that you have virus protection on
> your Exchange servers, over and above whatever gateway virus
It is absolutely essential that you have virus protection on your Exchange
servers, over and above whatever gateway virus protection you might be
running.
Jason
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Atkinson, Daniel
> Sent
I though scanmail works on the IMS, not the MTA? Forgive my ignorance if
not...
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 04 July 2003 15:08
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: best linux av?
>
>
> Yes, but if (assuming for whatever reason the d
Yes, but if (assuming for whatever reason the desktop AV doesn't kick in)
someone downloads and runs something nasty, what would stop god knows what
from being sent to all your internal users, even if the gateway AV traps it
on the way out to the Internet?
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network A
Well, the linux products do file blocking etc so I don't any difference,
apart from freeing up tons of CPU cycles on the exchange box and seeing less
of that crappy 'retrieving data' dialog in outlook...
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 04 July
Oh, and to somewhat attempt to answer the question, RAV and Vexira (the
latter in particular) seem to be highly thought of, RAV maybe less so as of
late due to uncertainty after the MS takeover.
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378
I'm kind of in a similar position, I just can't help but think that whatever
you have at the gateway there's a bit of added reassurance having something
like Scanmail on the Exchange box, given the file blocking capabilities and
all.
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
i prefer using MILTER on sendmail and then choose your own command line
based unix AV solution.
mike
- Original Message -
From: "Atkinson, Daniel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, July 04, 2003 3:08 PM
Subject: best linux av?
> just wonde
Hi, See earlier mail Ex2K - Distribution List Problems after EntAdmin
Errors
Extended logging now on, any ideas what this error may mean? Can't see
anything in the KB.
Event Type:Warning
Event Source: MSExchangeTransport
Event Category: Exchange Store Driver
Event ID: 350
Date:
just wondering if anyone has a favourite AV scanner for linux with postfix
as the mta? our trend renewal is coming up and i'm thinking i'd like to
remove the CPU burden of AV scanning from the exchange box and put it on our
linux relay which also does the spam filtering.
thanks
dan.
_
16 matches
Mail list logo
