There's nothing obvious in the event log. I've also turning on a dianostic
logging to maximum.
Yes I can rpcping the server.
- Original Message -
From: "Missy Koslosky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 9:56 AM
Subject: Re: He
My take on this is that it sounds like the minimum requirement is end to end secure
connection over the Internet (as Andrey pointed out)...which does sound like a TLS
candidate. The problem with using PGP or the like is that you then rely on the
customer (client) to encrypt the email. If the r
Anything in the event logs? Can you use rpcping to reach the server from
the desktop?
- Original Message -
From: "Todd Boynton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 9:40 AM
Subject: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k
Just started t
Yes, I can telnet to the smtp port on the exchange server.
tracert shows no problems. Its one hop and < 10ms
No there are no other devices on the vlan.
- Original Message -
From: "Bob Sadler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, July 18, 200
No recommended time that I know of. The only thing I try to do is make sur
eit runs outside of my daily backups, and before everyone starts logging in
in the morning.
Nate Couch
EDS Messaging
> --
> From: Bridges, Samantha
> Reply To: Exchange Discussions
> Sent: Frid
Pinging doesn't necessarily mean you have no DNS issue :)
Can you telnet to port 25 of your exchange server from your machine?
Have you run a Traceroute from your machine to see where things might be
going amiss?
Has someone added a device on your network with the same IP address as
your Exchang
Yes, the Exchange Server can be pinged. I haven't been able to find any
problem with the DNS.
- Original Message -
From: "Shotton Jolyon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 9:43 AM
Subject: RE: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k
DNS would be my guess too.
The other week we replaced a network card in an Exchange server. During the
course of this it acquired a DHCP address. This DHCP address was retained
in the DNS server records even after the new network card was given the
server's original address. NT4 clients could s
Sounds like a DNS issue.
Bob Sadler
City of Leawood, KS, USA
WAN/Internet Specialist
913-339-6700 x194
Get a Life! Get TWO! Play Second Life!
http://secondlife.com/ss/?u=b4ebbfdd6af98a027fa7e89a86c55a68
-Original Message-
From: Todd Boynton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday,
Just started this morning. When people try to connect to the exchange
server (2000, sp3) they get the message saying Microsoft Exchange Server is
unavailable. IMAP, HTTP, and POP3 work great. None of the services are
complaining and I can't figure out what the problem is. Just for the heck
of i
That article fits perfectly I believe. Thanks for all of your help!
-Original Message-
From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 9:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: misconfigured sender
I'm not running Ex2k just yet, so my help is limited.
Problem is, I don't get an acutal error, just a delayed delivery report.
I have to delete the message from the queue for the NDR to be spawned
back to me. When I do that, I get the same results I do from the
kpafilms.com domain:
Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.
I'm not running Ex2k just yet, so my help is limited. However...
While it doesn't exactly match your symptoms (you shouldn't be getting a 4xx
error, as you're not even connected to the remote SMTP service), this
article may shed some light on the issue.
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?
Windows 2000 SP3
Exchange 2000 SP2 - can remember I put on SP3 or not and I forget where
to find out the level!
-Original Message-
From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 8:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: misconfigured sender
Exchange ve
Exchange version and SP level?
Windows version and SP level?
Steven
---
Steven Dickenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Network Administrator
The Key School, Annapolis Maryland
-Original Message-
From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 8:49 AM
To: Exchange Discuss
>Try sending an e-mail to me. Our MX records are similar to
kpafilms.com, in that our primary MX will refuse connections, >but our
secondary MX is fine. Send me a test message at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Finally!, we're getting somewhere. Steven, the message experienced the
same symptoms - it sits in
No, not 'always'. The key thing is to make sure the online maint window
is outside of your backup window, otherwise the backup process will halt
the maintenance. 01:00 - 07:00 is ok. If the window is larger than is
required by the process, multiple runs of the maintenance take place.
Check your
Casey,
Try sending an e-mail to me. Our MX records are similar to
kpafilms.com, in that our primary MX will refuse connections, but our
secondary MX is fine. Send me a test message at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Steven
---
Steven Dickenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Network Administrator
The Key School,
Exchange 5.5 sp4
Windows 2000 Advanced Server
The online defrag runs daily. I see it scheduled for 1:00a.m. to 7:00a.m.
every day. Is this OK? Just wondering if I should change this. What is
the recommended time for Online maintenance to run and for how long? Their
is a radio button for "Alwa
Yeah. Back it up as part of the store. What's the big deal? Its going to be
backed up anyway, and going to take the same amount of time and space. Why
are you making it needlessly complex?
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Syste
101 - 120 of 120 matches
Mail list logo
