Neither did he.
-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4
Director of Information Services
Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
http://www.hawaiilawyer.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley
[MVP]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 1:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;262399&Product=exch2k
From: "Erik L. Vesneski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Deleting remotely from another Outlook instance
Date: Fri, 12 Dec
Well, you have two ways that I can think of.
1. Use Exmerge (look at the documentation... it explains how to do
this)
2. Use the equivalent of the old exchange 5.5 service account and
outlook.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erik L.
Heya,
I have a situation.
On Win2k Exchange 2k. With Outlook I open another person's email
mailbox as requested by legal and management. I delete out the item
however how do I permanently delete that deleted item without changing
their pw and logging in as them. I do have OWA in place too.
That's no lie!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley [MVP]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 3:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
I can't be the Captain because I don't look good in shorts.
Ed Cro
I can't be the Captain because I don't look good in shorts.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone
Sent: Friday, Dece
"No, it does not mean that you unethical for not agreeing with my position
on MVP's." No, it makes you sensible.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC
Better yet, quit using POP.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov, Andrey
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 8:47 AM
To: Exchang
Ah. That would be "Reh row".
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 4:01 PM
To: Excha
Are you sure the underlying query returns any results?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris H
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 9
Perhaps you should bill fewer hours to compensate. On the whole, it'd
probably be a huge win for everyone. Except for you, of course.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No, you are the Capt. Don is Julie.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley [MVP]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 3:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
Are you calling me a coke addict?
Ed Crowley
You can relay off a box that is not exposed to the Internet for incoming
mail too.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Webb, Andy
Se
If you feel that way, a locked down Windows 2003 box running the SMTP
service is just as capable as a Unix box running sendmail.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailt
Are you calling me a coke addict?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 1:03 PM
To:
The same guy who played Siegfried from KAOS.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ely, Don
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 12:53 PM
T
It will never be a fact that "MVPs are unethical" because it simply isn't
true unless we are held to your silly standards.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMA
The truth is the truth whether or not you remember it, misrepresent it, or
lie about it. The truth is that there is an MVP web site,
http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=fh;en-us;mvpfaqs, which
discloses that we get some stuff. Nobody has ever tried to hide anything.
In the thread y
Guilty conscience too.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Deckler
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 6:11 PM
To: Exchange Discu
His qualifies as a six head
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
> -Original Message-
> From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 4:23 PM
> To: Exc
And how does sendmail (or any other SMTP server for that matter) differ
as far as allowing someone to send email to someone in a different
domain - relaying?
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 12:24 PM
To: Exchange Discuss
We have a few of those around campus - mostly Mac heads though. 22
years old is all you had to say... We have a 22 year old Mac Tech who is
also very bright and really knows his stuff but has the anti-MS attitude
from hell as well. We have tried to get him to see that he has a great
opportunity he
That's what they "want" you to believe... I think he preferred guys...
That's why Martin wants to be the Doc... :P
-Original Message-
From: John Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 4:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
I get to be doc then.
He always got busy with the chix.
John Parker, MCSE
IS Admin.
Senior Technical Specialist
Alpha Display Systems.
Alpha Video
7711 Computer Ave.
Edina, MN. 55435
952-896-9898 Local
800-388-0008 Watts
952-896-9899 Fax
612-804-8769 Cell
952-841-3327 Direct
[EMAIL PROTECTED
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Webb, Andy
> If $1200 is 25% of a GW-Ex migration for 700 people then the project
was severely underscoped > and underbid.
No kidding. The design and implementation plan alone for a project of
that size is w
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/sbs/upgrade/default.mspx
Scroll down.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 4:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Seeking documentation
Thanks for reading. I am looking into
Thanks for reading. I am looking into migrating to SBS 2003 from Windows
NT 4 domain. I have a PDC (NT4), SQL 2000(Win2k) and Exchange 5.5 (NT4)
all running on separate servers. I have not found any documentation about
the upgrade/migration of this particular scenario. Any help?
[EMAIL PROTECT
More of a fivehead eh?
-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4
Director of Information Services
Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
http://www.hawaiilawyer.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin
Blackstone
Sent: Friday, December 12,
Forehead = Pen... :P
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 4:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
Your forehead goes to the back of your neck.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PR
This from the man with a really tall forehead and chicken legs... Who are
you to talk? :P
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 4:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
You and Don should
Your forehead goes to the back of your neck.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ely, Don
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 1:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
This from the man with a really tall forehead
Coochie Coochie!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin
Blackstone
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 4:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
http://www.showtimemarketing.com/images/charo.jpg
-Origina
http://www.showtimemarketing.com/images/charo.jpg
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ely, Don
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 1:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
Who the hell was that? I don't remember
You and Don should not be talking about hairlines
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David, Andy
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 1:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
Good choice. The doctor has the s
Who the hell was that? I don't remember no Charo!
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 4:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
You want to complain? Fine, your Charo.
-Original Mess
Good choice. The doctor has the same hairline and legs as you.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 4:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
Ed. You're Julie, the coked up cruise director.
You want to complain? Fine, your Charo.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ely, Don
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 12:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
I wanna be Issac!! :P
-Original Message---
I wanna be Issac!! :P
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 4:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
Ed. You're Julie, the coked up cruise director. I'm the Dr.
-Original Message-
I gotta do something! Apparently, if I were even LUCKY enough to get
nominated to be an MVP, I'd be violating some code of ethics that doesn't
exist if I were to accept such a nomination :(
-Original Message-
From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2
Ed. You're Julie, the coked up cruise director. I'm the Dr.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ely, Don
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 12:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
Ok, so who plays Capt. Stubin
You guys crack me up.
=)
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 3:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
The Swynk List...
Exciting and New...
Climb Aboard...
We'll be flaming YOU...
-O
Ok, so who plays Capt. Stubin? :p
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 3:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
The Swynk List...
Exciting and New...
Climb Aboard...
We'll be flaming YOU..
The Swynk List...
Exciting and New...
Climb Aboard...
We'll be flaming YOU...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ely, Don
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 12:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
Or is it...
Or is it...
The LOVE Boat...
Exciting and New...
Climb Aboard...
We're expecting YOU...
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 3:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
We have a love connect
We have a love connection!!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rachel Pickens
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 12:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
Hi Neighbor,
I'm just over a ways, off of I75 and Carut
Hi Neighbor,
I'm just over a ways, off of I75 and Caruth Haven.
Right across from Northpark mall in the big ugly gold towers.
Traffic on 75 is horrid right now.
-Original Message-
From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 2:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
S
I am owned by my MSDN cd cases and Microsoft pens. Long live the overlord!
It's raining here (Dallas, TX), too.
(A very wet) Eric Fretz
L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel: 972.772.7501
fax: 972.772.7510
-Original Message-
From: Rachel
I was not arguing with you about the symantics between fact & opinion, just
rather pointing out that you tend to assert your opinions as fact. That is
a very abrasive personality trait and probably explains why the discussion
list has reacted to you the way that they have.
Eric Fretz
L-3 Communi
There's no physical proof that you as a so-called professional are not
unethical either. When did you stop beating your wife?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Deckler
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 12:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Su
There will always be people too stupid not to use POP3 as well. What
can you say. POP3 is an unsecure and unsecurable protocol without
adding something else.
You can use multiple interfaces and have your POP clients connect
differently. You can allow relaying only if they first set up a VPN
con
If $1200 is 25% of a GW-Ex migration for 700 people then the project was
severely underscoped and underbid. It seems like the customer has
chosen cost over quality. C'est la vie.
As for your positions, they are your opinion. Not fact. Not an opinion
that many people agree with either. There a
Pens, Post-It Pads, the occasional portfolio-pad-book thing, mouse or
logo watch (I don't wear wristwatches). Nice trinkets, most of which my
wife takes.
Doctors and lawyers get truckloads of vendor gifts. My mother is a
cancer researcher. Every coffee mug she owns has a pharmaceutical name
on i
Jolyon,
This Greg doesn't see it that way... He thinks the pens and mousepads are evil, and
will corrupt you.
But note, he he thinks utility software should be free. (he mentioned Novell by
name)
You missed the last time this subject came up, it raged for a week with no real
conclusion.
He i
I was going to ask what form this compensation took.
So it's on the level of the free pens the drugs companies give to doctors
rather than being so much greater than the salary your employer pays that
your loyalty lies utterly with Microsoft then?
*Phew*
Also, can I say again that hawaiilawyer.c
I don't recall ever claiming to not be compensated -- though I hardly
call what I receive from Microsoft to be "compensation" in any
significant understanding of the word.
Furthermore this so-called "compensation" appears to be misplaced, since
it hasn't altered my behavior. I provided support
That's true, your beliefs being on the fringe does not make them any
less correct. It's the fact that you're wrong that makes them less
correct.
This imagined ethical crisis you've come up with simply doesn't exist.
The vast majority of MVPs are interested in the best solution to the
given challe
I love my Gammy but I won't let her sit on a freshly-upholstered sofa.
--
be - MOS
> -Original Message-
> From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 4:28 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Best backup software for Exchange
>
>
> Funny
I wonder if any Linux people like the WTO :)
-Original Message-
From: Sean Faust [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 1:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail Processing by Exchange vs. SendMail
>Oh, let me tell you, he hates Bill, Microcrap comes out of
Hi russki
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 11:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail Processing by Exchange vs. SendMail
Just call me Russki.
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTE
We do it because puremessage runs on sendmail.
-Original Message-
From: Sean Faust [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 11:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail Processing by Exchange vs. SendMail
>Back to my original question, we use Surf Control in fron
Anything that is not a fact is an opinion. It will never be a fact that
MVP's are unethical, because not everyone is going to agree on it and
there is no physical proof either way.
> No, you can make a statement as a fact or as an opinion. It is how you
> quantify the statement that sets the dist
>Oh, let me tell you, he hates Bill, Microcrap comes out of his mouth far
too often. He's only 22 years old and a genius kid, good natured, knows
his stuff. He is also an MCSE only because he was forced into it. The
fact that someone develops a product to sell and then gets rich really
pisses th
Brilliant comic timing.
Eric Fretz
L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel: 972.772.7501
fax: 972.772.7510
-Original Message-
From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 8:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject
Just call me Russki.
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 12:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail Processing by Exchange vs. SendMail
Yes, you were lucky. I have seen this exact scenario happen a couple
times
now. Fy
>Back to my original question, we use Surf Control in front of SendMail
which then forwards on to the Exchange Servers. Why would you put
SendMail in as an intermediary? Is just the way Unix/Linux admins do
things or is there a valid reason?
Thanks for the replies. Good Information.
It al
Well, a server-based rule will work even when Outlook is not running.
However it will present a great danger of starting a mail loop.
Another way to do this would be to write some more intelligent code and
create an event sink.
Sincerely,
Andrey Fyodorov, Exchange MVP
Systems Engineer
Messaging
No, you can make a statement as a fact or as an opinion. It is how you
quantify the statement that sets the distinction. Starting a sentence as "I
think that MVPs are unethical" is different than saying, "MVPs ARE
unethical".
Eric Fretz
L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery B
It always passed the relay tests that I threw at the though. This was a
simple environment and no other relaying was allowed. I suspect that the
systems you have worked on had some other reason for relaying besides that
ones you mentioned.
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [ma
Hi,
We want to send an automatic response to the sender when an email is
sent to the support mail ID of our company. I am interested in
implementing a server based autoresponder for exchange 2000. So far,
I've only seen products that run on Outlook. If you know of any
server-based products that do
Hi,
We moved over the Qmail after having to upgrade and secure our Sendmail
servers after a few times.
I have always been a believer in placing an MTA as a bridgehead in front
of Exchange. On the other hand, I think its entirely possible to manage
an Exchange server with 25 open to the Internet.
Same thing with Imail. In its tightest configuration, one must
authenticate in order to send mail from a POP3/SMTP client to an
external address. No need to authenticate to send mail to someone on the
same Imail server.
Imail has other ways to control relay permissions but they are inferior
(like
We have a sendmail box out in front of our exchange org purely for spam
filtering. We are running PureMessage on Slackware 9.
-Original Message-
From: Hague, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 9:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail Processing by Ex
That's obviously absurd - Sendmail probably does process more mail than
Exchange on similar hardware but that's pretty much all sendmail does.
It doesn't provide the additional features that Exchange has out of the
box particularly if you are an Active Directory shop. Besides, what
difference does
Tears freeze as they fall.
A saint upon a high horse,
Is tall but smells bad.
-Original Message-
From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 12 December 2003 17:06
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
OK, since it is Friday, I declare that further fol
I thing Greg is saying that a POP3/SMTP user can't send mail OUTSIDE the
organization without relaying (with authentication) turned on.
Which is another good reason to NOT expose Exchange SMTP to the outside
world. It is now apparently common knowledge among spammers that
Exchange defaults to allo
I won't have any need to cry. My relays are tight.
Sincerely,
Andrey Fyodorov, Exchange MVP
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 12:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: R
Well, I'll believe my own eyes. I've seen it happen. Don't come cryin' to
me when you get nailed by the spammers.
> Hey there always will be people that don't like POP3.
>
> I perfectly understand how Exchange works by the way. I also perfectly
> understand SMTP. Believe me, most SMTP servers out
Hey there always will be people that don't like POP3.
I perfectly understand how Exchange works by the way. I also perfectly
understand SMTP. Believe me, most SMTP servers out there (Exchange,
iMAIL, SendMail, etc.) accept Anonymous connections. It does not meant
that they relay mail for Anonymous
you only see the TLF. You cannot expand to see any underneath.
- Original Message -
From: "Ed Crowley [MVP]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 8:46 PM
Subject: RE: XCH 2k3 public folders in mixed site
> Please explan wh
That is not funny
Haiku is for more than that
I think I need beer
-Original Message-
From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 10:06 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
OK, since it is Friday, I declare that further fo
OK, since it is Friday, I declare that further followups to this thread
be done in Haiku!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Deckler
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 10:05 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6
Urg to kill...rising...
"Dude", you apparently don't understand what I am talking about.
Urg to kill...fading...rising!...fading...
> Dude, I don't know who you are but you are wrong.
>
> All SMTP servers must accept anonymous connections, otherwise no one on =
> the Internet would be able to se
Yes, you were lucky. I have seen this exact scenario happen a couple times
now. Fydora or whoever apparently did not understand this scenario but it
is a fairly common scenario in small office environments with people on
the road connecting their laptops to hotel networks and the like. Yes, OWA
is
Greetings,
We recently migrated to Outlook 2002. Some users are seeing a problem when
they receive a meeting request, a tentative meeting is added to their
calendar. Upon accepting the meeting a second entry is added for the same
meeting. Has anyone else seen this problem?
Thanks much!
K
_
:(
I was the first one to mention it :(
I am gonna go cry now :(
-Original Message-
From: Chinnery, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 9:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SMTP mail not reaching Exchange Server
Cool site. Thanks for posting, Don.
I have seen this many times - Outlook XP freaks out and starts asking
for password all of a sudden. Sometimes it seems to coincide with the
company's change password policy (even if the specific user is set to
never expire). Just change the user's password, log out, log back in and
see if it helped
It's been a while since I've supported POP3 clients on Exchange (5.5) but,
as I recall, I had no issues with anonymous relaying. I believe that
Exchange 5.5 allowed anonymous SMTP inbound connections (that is,
connections for mail to be delivered locally) and would allow relaying by
authenticated
Dude, I don't know who you are but you are wrong.
All SMTP servers must accept anonymous connections, otherwise no one on the Internet
would be able to send mail to each other.
Also Exchange perfectly understands the difference between inbound mail and a relay
situation. When you restrict relay
While I am not sure that the "Greg" in this post was directed at me or
whether this is some new form of abuse and sarcasm, it is pretty much
irrelevant as I do have some things to say on this issue.
The biggest problem that I have had with Exchange on the outside of the
SMTP mail chain is anti-spa
Now THAT's funny.
> I just saved a bunch of money on my car insurance.
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason Clishe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 9:28 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
>
> Shut the fu*k up alrea
Well, if you're big enough to look past my views on MVP, I think I can let
it slide. Many thanks for your response. And, BTW, $1200 is 25% of the
budget for this project, that's a big chunk of change.
P.S. And because I have been heckled to death on this issue, I feel the
need to clarify because I
Thanks, but there is no problem logging in to OWA, it's only Outlook POP3
that requests passwords and only this 1 client out of 5 who also log in
using POP3.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Int
How much mail can Exchange process? A lot.
If you understand how an e-mail is handled with Exchange SMTP services, you
can design the server (include memory, processor and disk layout) you can
make it fly.
I stress tested the IIS SMTP to see what I could get out of it. I rated the
box at over 500
Um, no, it can't. But that's a whole different story. Microsoft has some
hard num bers about the speed of the IIS SMTP component in comparison to
sendmail. I think they're in a whitepaper someone on the MS site.
That being said, I'm not a fan of exposing Exchange directly to the
Internet. If for n
and I suppose..."Can't we all just get along..." is next and maybe
Kumbyha
It's the holiday seasonim thinking Seuss a classic...
-Original Message-
From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 9:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrati
> Greg, would you please help with this discussion on SendMailYour input will be
> highly regardedThanks
Tell him Postfix is more secure... :P
>
> Personally, I like to put another server at the edge for SMTP that is NOT
> Exchange when I can...
>
> As far as who's faster at processing
I like ketchup.
John Parker, MCSE
IS Admin.
Senior Technical Specialist
Alpha Display Systems.
Alpha Video
7711 Computer Ave.
Edina, MN. 55435
952-896-9898 Local
800-388-0008 Watts
952-896-9899 Fax
612-804-8769 Cell
952-841-3327 Direct
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Be excellent to each other"
---End of
Aflac!!
-Original Message-
From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 9:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
I just saved a bunch of money on my car insurance.
-Original Message-
From: Jason Clishe [mailto:
I just saved a bunch of money on my car insurance.
-Original Message-
From: Jason Clishe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 9:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
Shut the fu*k up already, everyone. If anyone wants to continue
Shut the fu*k up already, everyone. If anyone wants to continue this
childish diatribe, take it offline.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Deckler
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 10:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo
