> What, you wanted to give away software that was free?
>
> On 1/17/03 8:26, "Daniel Chenault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> Makes me wish I had time to continue developing this.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Niki Blowfield - Excha
Yes
No
- Original Message -
From: "Clishe, Jason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 4:20 PM
Subject: Need recommendation for 3rd party Exchange 2000 POP3 Connectors
Does anyone have any experience with any of the 3rd party
The message is not making it to the IMC; the MTA is puking. Look for other
events regarding the MTA or the IS complaining about the MTA.
- Original Message -
From: "Pat Richard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 3:56 PM
Subjec
Makes me wish I had time to continue developing this.
-Original Message-
From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 5:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Free Mailing List Software
Sensitivity: Private
Hello
Can anyone recommend a good
All on it's own the bits and bytes spinning in a virtual world of magnetic
potentialities up and changed themselves.
Yeah-huh, right.
- Original Message -
From: "Andrey Fyodorov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 11:59 AM
Just have a 90-day backup tape retention policy.
- Original Message -
From: "Clemens, Rick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 5:05 PM
Subject: The SEC is killing me.
> Mixed Exchange 5.5 SP4 / Exchange 2000 SP3
> 100% Act
Depends on the connection and how it is built; it's determined by the
software. Note there is a choice in later versions of OL (starting with 98 I
believe) to use RPC encryption. The level of encryption is based on the
bitness of the underlying OS.
You don't find too many whitepapers on it because
If BLAT failed the problem is on his end. Period.
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 3:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: messages frozen in an SMTP queue
Hi all. I have Exchange 2000, SP3.
Due to company's needs some
MCS only.
-Original Message-
From: Walden H. Leverich III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 12:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Customizing the uncustomizable
Is RLQuickED a MCS-provided only tool, or something publically available. A
quick Google on R
There is a 32K limit to rules storage. This client has hit that limit.
-Original Message-
From: MS Exchange Mailing List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 10:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Trouble with creating a rule in Outlook to forward email
I ha
Dang, ain't much that can't be accessed. FTP is not there, nor is a web
server, but hey, with 135 and 139 there are possibilities.
Perhaps you should considering hiring a security consultant to go over your
current setup? *cough*personal plug*cough*
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff
Both archived and a FAQ.
-Original Message-
From: MS Exchange Mailing List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 3:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Trouble with creating a rule in Outlook to forward email
Using Outlook 2k connecting to Exchange 5.5 I am tryi
And when the file gets overwritten by a service pack you'll have to do it
all over again.
-Original Message-
From: Kelley, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 6:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Customizing the uncustomizable
We worked with MCS an
Plain text because any mail client in the world can read it.
- Original Message -
From: "Darrin J. Carter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 10:02 AM
Subject: Opinions on the best message format.
Hi,
I wanted to get the
The person attempted to delete an item and does not have the rights to do
so. The delete operation is failing during sync and thus the message.
Clear it by removing the folder from being synched, synch once, then add it
back.
- Original Message -
From: "Gonzalez, Alex" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I use the USPS as my analogy. I do believe when Mr. Postel wrote the
original RFC he used the Post Office as his model.
-Original Message-
From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 11:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: "How do I explain NDRs"
And that server is running:
220 mpd.com.sg ESMTP Sendmail 8.11.6/8.11.6; Mon, 6 Jan 2003 22:42:39 +0800
The explanation should be pretty straightforward.
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 8:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Su
http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc1891.txt
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 7:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Message Delay
All,
Has anyone seen this message be sent back to them? What is it? And should
I be wor
Good luck; I hear the lobotomy only hurts for a little while. ;)
- Original Message -
From: "Don Couch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2002 12:53 PM
Subject: Aloha and thanks for the info and entertainment.
To all:
I have e
change, and modify
the value of 'Start' to equal either "2" (for automatic), "3" (for manual)
or "4" (for disabled)
http://www.winguides.com/registry/display.php/198/
:)
4
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]O
IMAP will do that as well.
- Original Message -
From: "Tim John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, December 28, 2002 1:39 AM
Subject: RE: Outlook Security
> Thanks for the reply. I have played with BLAT and Jmail, but the beauty of
> using
Or a .REG file imported. Can't remember off the top of my head what the
numbers are to represent disabled, manual and automatic but a little
experimenting and poling will reveal them.
- Original Message -
From: "Brian Ko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
S
Offhand I'd say it first checks the subnet, then response times.
- Original Message -
From: "Andrew Hitchcock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 23, 2002 3:25 PM
Subject: KB Article 319206 - O2K2 Use closes GC
> Hello all,
>Has
Although in another message you mentioned something about the server being
uninstalled and reinstalled or something like that leaving an orphan FB
folder.
- Original Message -
From: "Andrey Fyodorov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, Decembe
And don't turn it off. Set it to run in the offhours. And whoever set it to
run during the day, remove his admin privileges.
- Original Message -
From: "Andy David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 10:33 AM
Subject: Re: On
On a technical list I'm on that concerns Exchange (among other things)
someone forwarded to the list someone's OOF from a major company. From his
name and location the person found his address on the web. Since his OOF
said he'd be gone for two weeks, out of town on vacation, he essentially is
tell
Well, uh... an unauthenticated logon was attempted. What part of this is
mysterious?
- Original Message -
From: "McCready, Robert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:22 PM
Subject: Event ID: 1174
> Exchange 5.5. NT 4.0
Two choices:
1. Do a Disaster Recovery to a standby server. Extract the necessary data to
a PST. Admonish the user that important mail doesn't go in the Deleted Items
folder.
2. Tell the customer he's toast and show him some best practices.
-Original Message-
From: Jan Novák [mailto:[EMAIL
In terms of programming logic I recall it was on the order of 2^20, twenty
times more than what you heard.
- Original Message -
From: "Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 1:57 PM
Subject: Maximu
If it's doing NAT I don't think it'll work.
- Original Message -
From: "Andrey Fyodorov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 12:23 PM
Subject: OT: BellSouth DSL and MS VPN client
Hi all.
Does anyone here use BellSouth DSL s
already, unless the authority on Open Relays (www.ordb.org)
is totally wrong, I'm afraid you've just jumped to an erroneous conclusion.
SDC
-
Subject: Re: Exch5.5 - IMC (port 25) going down every morning (for past 3
week s)
From: "Daniel Chenault&quo
Nope.
-Original Message-
From: Herold Heiko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 2:05 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Add custom smtp header ?
Is it possible to add a custom smtp header to outgoing email with EX5.5 ?
I'd like to add a X-CUSTOM-something: to o
Perhaps you should close your machine against relay.
- Original Message -
From: "Shawn Connelly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 1:19 PM
Subject: Exch5.5 - IMC (port 25) going down every morning (for past 3 week
s)
> I am
server
> That would be ".".
>
> Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
> Tech Consultant
> hp Services
> Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Beha
Crystal Reports, comes with Exchange
- Original Message -
From: "Christopher Hummert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 12:46 PM
Subject: RE: Exchange log file utils and tools
> Anyone out there with a free one?
>
>
> --
Not without an external program. The specific functionality you seek is not
inherent in the product beyond archiving and/or logging. Since you have
programmers available they could write something to parse out the archives.
-Original Message-
From: Jerry J. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
to create the mailboxes and
> associate them to domain accounts in a child domain (made from the UK's
old
> NT4 domain joining our forest as a child)... Still hoping someone can
tell
> me if this can be done?
>
> Joe Pochedley
> If you have time to do it twice,
> you had
Ensure that the webware SMTP daemon is indeed sending .. to end the
SMTP conversation. This is what the error message is referring to. Some
mailers aren't as strict about it but that is the proper format. Qmail is
claiming that the mailer is sending .. to end the conversation.
-Original Messag
Do you mean move the domain accounts, or the mail accounts? If the latter,
setup a trust from the US to the UK. Use Exmerge to extract the UK users'
data and import it into the US server. There's not going to be an automated
way to do this, sorry. Add to your laundry list "administrative headache"
Ah...
A clear example of why obfuscating data when asking for help tends to cause
problems.
- Original Message -
From: "Hutchins, Mike" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 9:24 AM
Subject: RE: Strange NDR
Guys, "hidden b
You mean the UK users will have to access their mail over a link across the
pond? Oy...
Exmerge the whole mess out, give the PSTs to the users. Create the accounts
in your server and be done with it.
- Original Message -
From: "Joe Pochedley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions"
Nope. First logon will create the mailbox.
- Original Message -
From: "Petschow, Jeff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 9:56 AM
Subject: RE: cleaning a mailbox
> That sounds like a good idea. Do I need to do anything afte
I'll assume 5.5; in Exchange Administrator View:Hidden Recipients.
-Original Message-
From: Jerry J. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 7:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Strange NDR
Actually what happens is that when I type in the e-mail address that
You mean you type "hidden by jjones" in the TO: box and it underlines it?
Then it is a recipient on the server assumedly created, and hidden, by
jjones.
-Original Message-
From: Jerry J. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 4:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
You mean other then the prebuilt and installed-by-default perfmon objects?
- Original Message -
From: "Ali Wilkes (IT)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 10:59 AM
Subject: Monitoring MTA queues
Anyone know of a good way
Then let's troubleshoot why tbat operation is not working correctly as
opposed to gutting the server.
- Original Message -
From: "Jeffery Caudill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 11:25 AM
Subject: RE: eoo.log files
I ha
Put down the mouse, step back from the keyboard, and no one will get hurt.
- Original Message -
From: "Jeffery Caudill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 10:42 AM
Subject: eoo.log files
My exchange server is creating a se
06 AM
Subject: Re: eseutil
> But is that really repairing? You can argue that but those inconsistencies
> do not generate 1018, or 1019 errors.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Daniel Chenault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions"
On the contrary it can correct some minor inconsistencies as it shuffles
through every page in the database.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 10:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: eseutil
eseutil /d does not repair
1. Stop the IMS
2. Start the IMS
3. Happens automagically
If you really want to start the queue over
1a. Delete queue.dat
-Original Message-
From: Eve Jimah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 7:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: How to resend stuck messages
www.slipstick.com
-Original Message-
From: Lee Petri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 02, 2002 7:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Deleting attachments
I recently moved from Outlook 98 to Outlook Express 6. In OE6, how do I
delete attachments from received e-mails
cache.dat file used by only Outlook/Exchange?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, 04 December, 2002 10:46 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Illegal operation when deleting a recurring meeting
>
>
> A c
How many FB replicas do you have?
-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 9:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Calendar Problems
Good morning,
Outlook 98 Exchange 5.5 SP4
I am beginning to have several problems with Out
A calender is a form. Every window displayed in OL (Contacts, new message,
calendar entry, Task, Journal and more) is a form.
-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 9:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Illegal operatio
You didn't push for escalation? What makes you think that we can do better
than the people who have the source code? Never, EVER, let a PSS call die
without a resolution. You paid for it, you deserve the full treatment PSS
offers up to and including final escalation (if necessary).
-Original M
Likely directory latency (up to two hours). Restart the directory service.
- Original Message -
From: "Jean-Claude" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 29, 2002 3:23 PM
Subject: Re: setting the default SMTP address for a mailbox
> I
It's a setting in the user's properties on the Address tab.
- Original Message -
From: "Jean-Claude" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 29, 2002 1:40 PM
Subject: setting the default SMTP address for a mailbox
> Does anyone know how t
Anyone who has used OWA knows it can at times be painful. Hence my nickname
The Canadian Client.
Ow! Eh?
- Original Message -
From: "Martin Blackstone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 2:17 PM
Subject: RE: Can't delete e
#x27;s actually "Good, Fast, Cheap", but you are close enough...
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 12:45 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Getting email addresses from
It's maintained within the directory and not directly accessible. It's
possible DAPI can get to it prorammatically.
-Original Message-
From: Bevilacqua.Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 10:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc: Mateo.Jose; Kiser.Joseph
Subjec
Most anything is possible so long as you remember the engineer's byline:
Cheap, easy, fast
Pick two
-Original Message-
From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 10:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Getting email addresses from Inbox
A user ap
Nope, this particular little bugaboo has been around for a while.
-Original Message-
From: Wood, Harriet [CCS] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 11:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Ghost delegates
(Using exchange 5.5 on nt4 servers)
When users are del
Favorite folders maybe?
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Scharff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 7:10 PM
Subject: RE: Problems with Event ID 1023...
> Have the effected users create a new Outlook profile.
>
> > -Or
Better yet set the SMTP server to never send RTF. Problem solved.
- Original Message -
From: "Blunt, James H (Jim)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 4:59 PM
Subject: RE: Changing all contacts to plain text recipients
> An
There are a lot of intervening devices between you and your users. If they
havne't change anything, and you havent' changed anything and we work on the
assumption that the software didn't reconfigure or rewrite itself overnite
than the only logical explanation is that something in-between changed.
http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/interop/55.asp
I'm going to go ahead and be nasty here. If you are not able to navigate to
the Microsoft Exchange website (real hard to figure out:
www.microsoft.com/exchange) and from there find the link that talks about
coexistence and deployment (IBID)
One for the directory
One for the private store
One for the public store
One login to rule them all (directory)
one ring to bind them (private store)
One ring to bring them all (public store)
and in the darkness bind them (still on 5.0)
;)
-Original Message-
From: Mark Freeman [mailto:[E
ber 25, 2002 4:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
In fact Windows XP has a power tool image resize tool. Just right click on
an image, select resize and it will do it.
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 1:41 PM
To: Exchange Dis
: Monday, November 25, 2002 11:33 AM
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > >
> > > Its because the people that are between me and the CIO are wimps.
> > > Sorry. If I had it my way a lot of things would be
> > different here. I
> > > make plenty of arguments
weak it
is for us right now.
Thank you,
Alex Gonzalez
Senior Systems Administrator (unfotunatly)
Handleman Company
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 4:24 PM
To: Exchange Disc
Dare I ask?
What is the point of this exercise?
-Original Message-
From: Hatley, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 3:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: DL Export question
That still does not make it very viewable, the DN's are all jumbled together
Again...
Lesee.. What was the phrase Ed coined? "There are no technological solutions
for behavior problems"?
-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 3:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party softw
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 4:07 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
>
> I was thinking the same thing. Particularly a website. You
> could even email the links to a web server
> Htpp://servername/newhootersmagazinecove
or 3rd Party software for Send/Recieve on OXP
Well its mainly pictures of what displays are going to be in the store. Some
of these files used to be Gig sized but our advertising department has
shrunk them down quite a bit.
-----Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE
ment has
shrunk them down quite a bit.
-Original Message-----
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 3:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
What is this 2M file? Does it have to be 2M? Is it generic for all users,
specific to a region, specific to one us
ictures of what displays are going to be in the store. Some
of these files used to be Gig sized but our advertising department has
shrunk them down quite a bit.
-Original Message-----
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 3:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
pictures of what displays are going to be in the store. Some
of these files used to be Gig sized but our advertising department has
shrunk them down quite a bit.
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 3:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
How are you adding the SMTP field? What, exactly, are you typing the CSV
header file?
-Original Message-
From: Hatley, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 1:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: DL Export question
Actually its not just the SMTP field tha
total jerk about this question. I don't see what isn't
> > technical about this question. It wasn't a question of what our
> > people do, its how to automate our systems so they don't have to do
> > as much manual work and bill for it. Daniel Chenault hit the
t;
> Your being a total jerk about this question. I don't see what isn't
> technical about this question. It wasn't a question of what our
> people do, its how to automate our systems so they don't have to do as
> much manual work and bill for it. Daniel Chenault h
as much manual work
and bill for it. Daniel Chenault hit the nail on the head. It is creating a
technical solution for a non technical problem. Isn't that what technology
does? I apologize if I didn't give enough detail. These users are all on
dialup and receive large emails with large atta
That is the perfect description for an environment where Outlook is setup to
use an OST in offline mode. And the s/r frequency is configurable.
-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 12:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
He said in another message that there are remote users (using Outlook in
remote offline mode, but apparently not synching to an OST). The company
does not want to pay them to download mail; they want a way to
programmatically start Outlook, force it to download mail and then shut
down. That is what
x27;s
not what I said.
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 11:03 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
>
>
>
> What Chris is saying in his typical abrasive way is that so
> far it looks like you are
What is about this one DL that is different from the others?
-Original Message-
From: Hatley, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 12:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: DL Export question
I am trying to export using a csv file to gather DL information...i
hour. We are trying to find a way to make it
> automated so
> > they only have to hook their laptops up to the phone line and go to
> > bed.
> >
> > Thank you,
> >
> > Alex Gonzalez
> > Senior Systems Administrator
> > Handleman Company
>
s that we don't want to pay while they are
just sitting there waiting for their email to download.
Thank you,
Alex Gonzalez
Senior Systems Administrator
Handleman Company
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914
-Original Message-----
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
PROTECTED]
(248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, November 23, 2002 12:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
You must mean remote users working in offline mode, right?
-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto
Nope. They are two separate objects and, as such, are not seen as objects
that need to be synched. You could write a tool that does this, but native
to the product? No.
-Original Message-
From: Jason Coleman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, November 23, 2002 6:53 PM
To: Exchange
You must mean remote users working in offline mode, right?
-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 5:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for Send/Recieve on OXP
So that users don't h
As I said in an earlier post, the quickest way out of this would likely be
to move the mailboxes to another server, delete the priv on this one and
move them back.
- Original Message -
From: "Karon Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, Nove
Yes, you missed an option: asking on a list that is dedicated to such
issues. This one is for Exchange.
- Original Message -
From: "Orin Rehorst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 10:30 AM
Subject: OT: Absolute file protectio
"Open file" errors? What are you using to do backup?
-Original Message-
From: Karon Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 9:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Any command line switches to run Online defrag?
The reason we're trying to run it is becaus
Ah... More info that would have been helpful upfront.
On a Saturday...
Install another Exchange box.
Move the mailboxes to it.
Toast the old priv.edb.
Move the mailboxes back.
Deinstall the temp Exchange box.
-Original Message-
From: Karon Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday
Another thought:
Set up an internal box with a SMTP daemon. Run it on a port diff. from 25
(12345 or something equally unlikely). On your firewall map all inbound
requests for port 12345 to the IP of that internal box. As an added measure
use AUTH just in case some wiseguy finds the port on your b
A few ways I can think of:
1. On the same page where one can put in allowed IP addresses you can add
"only clients that authenticate." This, however, would require any POP/IMAP
clients using these servers to have to change their settings.
2. If it is a static set of addresses that are otherwise ext
ason why they would want to
this.
Just throwing it out there.
Thanks,
Darrin
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 4:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Exchange System Account
Doable, but why? I mean, I can wha
Doable, but why? I mean, I can whack myself in the head with a 2x4. Very
doable, but why?
- Original Message -
From: "Darrin J. Carter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 4:26 PM
Subject: Exchange System Account
Hi,
What
No. Better would be to troubleshoot why it isn't running. What is showing in
event viewer?
-Original Message-
From: Karon Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 10:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Any command line switches to run Online defrag?
Are t
7;t like not knowing why we are having this
problem, however...
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 7:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Weird SMTP header problem
I've been trying to follow along; maybe this
1 - 100 of 835 matches
Mail list logo
