RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5

2001-12-28 Thread Ed Premus
I agree that Antigen is better than NAV for Exchange, we have not had any problems with it for over a year. This is also a test because as of yet I have been unable to post a question _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/re

Client Access Problem

2001-12-28 Thread Ed Premus
I recently upgraded our Exchange 5.5 server from IE 3.01 to 5.5 Sp2. I don't really understand this but clients are able to connect internally (including VPN) and through OWA. However when I try to connect through the internet, it is failing with "Unable to open your default email folders. The mic

Client Connectivity

2001-12-28 Thread Ed Premus
I recently upgraded our Exchange 5.5 standard server from IE 4.01 to 5.5 sp2 and got up to date on patches. I am not sure this is the cause, but now internally clients connect fine (including the VPN), owa works fine. However, when connecting over the internet, I get an error "Unable to open your

RE: Client Access

2001-12-28 Thread Ed Premus
Don, sorry about the multiples. I didn't think they were getting posted. So I tried an number of different ways. I actually was going to email just you and ask if this list was updated real time. I know it is unsecure, but that is really not my choice, I have just really locked this machine down a

RE: Client Access

2001-12-28 Thread Ed Premus
The pix has been in place around a year. I wasn't kidding when I said I was going to email you and ask, so I wasn't being a smart A**. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http:

RE: Client Access

2001-12-28 Thread Ed Premus
Yes and it is wide open, any to any (it won't stay this way). I havn't had it explained to me with viable content, but our company does alot of work for other companies with secure networks. These networks generally are not going to allow the vpn ports to be opened on their network. However, we mu

RE: Client Access

2001-12-28 Thread Ed Premus
Sorry for not being clear, upgraded to 5.5 sp4 patched IIS updated ie to 5.5 sp2 and security patches This is kind of a weird situation, security was not a concern of this company until around the last six months. I do want to close the machine off from the internet as much as possible, but I wa

RE: Client Access

2001-12-28 Thread Ed Premus
Don't access the internet from it, I have no good explanation for why I upgraded the browser. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To

RE: Client Access

2001-12-28 Thread Ed Premus
Oulook 2000 SP2 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL P

Re: Client Connectivity

2001-12-28 Thread Ed Premus
Thanks for your help! I apologize again for the multiples. I'm going to leave it as it is and hopefully on monday my boss will agree not to expose the server so much. Thanks again _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resour

RE: Client Access

2001-12-28 Thread Ed Premus
Upgraded from 5.5 SP3 I checked for the static RPC ports and the dword entries for tcp/ip port are not there. This is the info I got from the knowledge base. Is this correct? Also I can't remember where but isn't there somewhere on the information store besides the recipients container, that cli

RE: Client Access

2001-12-28 Thread Ed Premus
Also we are about to upgrade from 5.5 standard to enterprise, are there any pitfalls that I need to know about? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesea

RE: Client Access

2001-12-28 Thread Ed Premus
Sorry to keep posting. I just tried to logon to the machine as the local administrator, dialed up, started the vpn, and tried to set up my profile logged on as the local administrator. When the logon pop up came up, which I had used previously, I entered my information. It failed, it is like it is

RE: Client Access

2001-12-29 Thread Ed Premus
Thanks for your help, I'm not an exchange guru (havn't been doing it for long) and learned a lot. I didn't need to make the ports static (wide open firewall). I will push to remove this type of access. it wasn't permissions (i thought it may have been this because a few weeks ago I removed an ever