yes. you would do it, then deny it.
:P
-Original Message-
From: Les Bessant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 13 June 2003 11:32
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 11
Me?
Les Bessant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IT Manager
Sanderson Townend Gilbert
22-24 Grey Street
Newcastle upon Tyne
what is the right end of a 256MB pipe?
:)
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 09 June 2003 12:47
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sync Folders - Small Bandwith
Technically, I guess they use more, but I'm not 100% sure. Keep in mind that
PST's
100:1?
(we all know how often they happen)
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 09 June 2003 15:49
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: **NOT SPAM (ME)** Re: ** SPAM (5.50/5.00) ** RE: ** SPAM
(6.00/5.00) ** RE: Change FQDN in Ex55
What are
Exchange won't be the expensive bit - AD will.
:)
-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 09 June 2003 15:52
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Why would I want to go to Exchange 2003/Outlook 2003
Good morning,
Surely you are laughing by now. But my
1) Probably due to the log files filling up if the virus was trying to send lots of
mail. check to see where your log files are held, and the time stamps on them. These
should clear on the next full, exchange aware, backup.
2) edb stm files hold copies of the same data in different formats
yes - the new version (3.0) will be a 'product' available in two flavours: std allows
connectivity between 2 AD infrastructures; adv allows connectivity between different
directory/database environments.
MCS are no longer required to provide this
I got this info from a TechNet briefing, so
Last I heard it wasn't avilable to end of summer
-Original Message-
From: Evensen, Sam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 04 June 2003 15:04
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Microsoft Metadirectory Services 2003
I am trying to find MMS 2003, specifically the GAL sync tool. I understand
7 matches
Mail list logo
